Research Article
The Effect of Electromagnetic Field Treatment on Recovery from Ischemic Stroke in a Rat Stroke Model: Clinical, Imaging, and Pathological Findings
Table 2
Histopathological findings.
| | Animal | Group | Location of positive BrdU | Location of positive Nestin | Location of positive DC | Location of positive GFAP |
| | #2 | M1 | Infarct + ventricle | — | — | Infarct | | #26 | M1 | Infarct + ventricle | — | — | Infarct | | #29 | M1 | Infarct + ventricle | — | — | Infarct | | #20 | M2 | Infarct + ventricle | Ventricle | Ventricle | Infarct | | #40 | M2 | Infarct + ventricle | — | — | Infarct | | #7 | M2 | Infarct + ventricle | Ventricle | — | Infarct | | #11 | M3 | Infarct + ventricle | Ventricle | — | Infarct | | #38 | M3 | Infarct + ventricle | Infarct | Ventricle | Infarct | | #25 | M3 | Infarct + ventricle | Infarct | — | Infarct |
|
|
M1 group received sham, M2 received 3.93 Hz treatment, and M3 received 15.72 Hz treatment. BrdU, detecting cell proliferation. GFAP, detecting CNS cells. Nestin, detecting brain stem cells. Double-Cortin, detecting progenitor cells.
|
