Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Stroke Research and Treatment
Volume 2018, Article ID 8087372, 9 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/8087372
Review Article

Rationale for Intervention and Dose Is Lacking in Stroke Recovery Trials: A Systematic Review

1Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Melbourne, 245 Burgundy St., Heidelberg 3084, VIC, Australia
2NHMRC CRE Stroke Rehabilitation & Brain Recovery, 245 Burgundy St., Heidelberg 3084, VIC, Australia
3Brain Behaviour Laboratory, Department of Physical Therapy, The University of British Columbia, Koerner Pavilion UBC Hospital, 2211 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T2B7, Canada

Correspondence should be addressed to Julie Bernhardt; ua.ude.yerolf@tdrahnreb.eiluj

Received 3 May 2018; Accepted 8 October 2018; Published 30 October 2018

Academic Editor: Augusto Fusco

Copyright © 2018 Karen Borschmann et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

How to Cite this Article

Karen Borschmann, Kathryn S. Hayward, Audrey Raffelt, Leonid Churilov, Sharon Kramer, and Julie Bernhardt, “Rationale for Intervention and Dose Is Lacking in Stroke Recovery Trials: A Systematic Review,” Stroke Research and Treatment, vol. 2018, Article ID 8087372, 9 pages, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/8087372.