Stroke Research and Treatment / 2021 / Article / Tab 3 / Research Article
Effects of Pharyngeal Electrical Stimulation on Swallow Timings, Clearance and Safety in Post-Stroke Dysphagia: Analysis from the Swallowing Treatment Using Electrical Pharyngeal Stimulation (STEPS) Trial Table 3 Comparison of PAS, timing, and clearance measures for 5 ml mode swallow, by change score from baseline to two weeks, using Independent Samples
-Test (continuous variables) and Mann–Whitney
Test (ordinal variables).
5 ml measures–mode swallow PES Mean (SD) No PES Mean (SD) Difference (95% CI) valuePAS, modal bolus 38 -1.45 (3.06) 33 -0.85 (2.54) -0.60 (-1.93, 0.73) 0.37 PAS, mean all boli 38 -0.99 (1.66) 34 -0.95 (1.58) -0.04 (-0.80, 0.72) 0.91 OTT 20 -0.64 (1.83) 9 -0.51 (1.37) -0.13 (-1.41, 1.14) 0.83 SRT 28 -1.98 (8.94) 27 -1.05 (3.39) -0.92 (-4.60, 2.76) 0.62 ILC 24 -2.04 (9.73) 24 -1.17 (3.55) -0.87 (-5.19, 3.45) 0.68 LVC_rt 25 -0.07 (0.15) 25 -0.01 (0.19) -0.07 (-0.17, 0.03) 0.18 LCD 22 0.04 (0.18)) 25 -0.00 (0.19) 0.04 (-0.07, 0.15) 0.43 PRT 15 0.01 (0.16) 9 0.01 (0.08) -0.00 (-0.10, 0.10) 0.97 PTT 15 -3.66 (12.12) 10 -1.49 (5.26) -2.17 (-9.55, 5.21) 0.55 UOSD 15 0.03 (0.15) 10 0.00 (0.09) 0.03 (-0.07, 0.13) 0.58 Initiation of pharyngeal swallow (0-4) 36 0 [2] 32 0 [1] -0.5 (-1,0) 0.52 Ramus 8 (22.2) 5 (15.6) Valleculae 6 (16.7) 2 (6.3) Laryngeal surface 5 (13.9) 3 (9.4) Pyriforms 17 (47.2) 22 (68.8) No visible initiation 0 (0.0) Oral residue (0-4) 22 0 [0] 23 0 [0] -0.5 (-1,0) 0.64 Complete clearance 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) Trace residue 7 (31.8) 5 (21.7) Residue collection 14 (63.6) 18 (78.3) Majority bolus remaining 1 (4.5) 0 (0.0) Minimal/no clearance 0 (0.0) 0.(0.0) Pharyngeal residue (0-4) 31 0 [0] 29 0 [1] 0 (-1,0) 0.53 Complete clearance 2 (6.5) 0 (0.0) Trace residue 11 (35.5) 14 (48.3) Residue collection 18 (58.1) 15 (51.7) Majority bolus remaining 0 (0.0) 0.(0.0) Minimal/no clearance 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) No. of swallows to clear 5 ml 38 0.11 (1.39) 33 0.12 (1.22) -0.02 (-0.63, 0.60) 0.96