Research Article
Comparison of Methods for Dependency Determination between Human Failure Events within Human Reliability Analysis
Table 1
SPAR-H dependency.
| Condition number | Crew (same or different) | Time (close in time or not close in time) | Location (same or
different) | Cues (additional or no additional) | Dependency | |
| 1 | S | C |
S | NA | COMPLETE | When considering | 2 | | | | A | COMPLETE | recovery in a series, for | 3 | | | D | NA | HIGH | example, 2nd, 3rd, or | 4 | | | | A | HIGH | 4th checker: | 5 | | NC |
S | NA | HIGH | if this error is the | 6 | | | | A | MODERATE | 3rd error in the sequence, | 7 | | | D | NA | MODERATE | then the dependency is | 8 | | | | A | LOW | at least moderate; | 9 |
D | C |
S | NA | MODERATE | if this error is the | 10 | | | | A | MODERATE | 4th error in the sequence, | 11 | | | D | NA | MODERATE | then the dependency | 12 | | | | A | MODERATE | is at least high | 13 | |
NC | S | NA | LOW | | 14 | | | | A | LOW | | 15 | | |
D | NA | LOW | | 16 | | | | A | LOW | | 17 | | | | | ZERO | |
|
|