Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations
Volume 2009 (2009), Article ID 213981, 10 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2009/213981
Research Article

CFD Application to Hydrogen Risk Analysis and PAR Qualification

School of Nuclear Science and Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, No. 800 Dongchuan Road, Shanghai 200240, China

Received 19 September 2008; Revised 30 November 2008; Accepted 15 January 2009

Academic Editor: Walter Ambrosini

Copyright © 2009 Jinbiao Xiong et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. J. R. Travis, J. W. Spore, P. Royl et al., “GASFLOW: a computational fluid dynamics code for gases, aerosols, and combustion,” Vol. 2, User's Manual, LA-13357-MS, FZKA-5994, October 1998.
  2. E. Bachellerie, F. Arnould, M. Auglaire et al., “Generic approach for designing and implementing a passive autocatalytic recombiner PAR-system in nuclear power plant containments,” Nuclear Engineering and Design, vol. 221, no. 1–3, pp. 151–165, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. T. Zhang et al., “Operation manual of nuclear power plant,” Nuclear Power Qinshan Joint Venture Company Ltd., 2005.
  4. J. R. Travis, J. W. Spore, P. Royl et al., “GASFLOW: a computational fluid dynamics code for gases, aerosols, and combustion,” Vol. 1, Theory Manual, LA-13357-MS, FZKA-5994, October 1998.
  5. J. Malet, L. Blumenfeld, S. Arndt et al., “Sprays in containment: final results of the sarnet spray benchmark,” in Proceedings of the 3rd European Review Meeting on Severe Accident Research (ERMSAR '08), pp. 1–19, Nessebar, Bulgaria, September 2008.
  6. P. Royl, H. Rochholz, W. Breitung, J. R. Travis, and G. Necker, “Analysis of steam and hydrogen distributions with PAR mitigation in NPP containments,” Nuclear Engineering and Design, vol. 202, no. 2-3, pp. 231–248, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. OECD/NEA, “SOAR on Containment Thermalhydraulics and Hydrogen Distribution,” Tech. Rep. CSNI-R99-16, OECD Nuclear Energy Agency, Nuclear Safety, Paris, France, June 1999. View at Google Scholar
  8. S. B. Dorofeev, M. Kutznetsov, V. Alekseev, A. A. Efimenko, and W. Breitung, “Evaluation of limits for effective flame acceleration in hydrogen mixtures,” Report IAE-6150/3, Kurchatov Institute, Moscow, Russia, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  9. E. A. Reinecke, J. Boehm, P. Drinovac, S. Struth, and I. M. Tragsdorf, “Numerical and experimental investigations on catalytic recombiners,” in Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Nuclear Engineering (ICONE '05), Beijing, China, May 2005, ICONE 13-50267.
  10. M. Heitsch, “Fluid dynamic analysis of a catalytic recombiner to remove hydrogen,” Nuclear Engineering and Design, vol. 201, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. H. Ikeda, P. A. Libby, F. A. Williams, and J. Sato, “Catalytic combustion of hydrogen—air mixtures in stagnation flows,” Combustion and Flame, vol. 93, no. 1-2, pp. 138–148, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar