Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations
Volume 2009, Article ID 759878, 13 pages
Project Report

GASFLOW Validation with Panda Tests from the OECD SETH Benchmark Covering Steam/Air and Steam/Helium/Air Mixtures

1Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe, Institut für Kern- und Energietechnik, 76021 Karlsruhe, Germany
2Division of Thermal-Hydraulics and Safety Research, Korean Atomic Energy Research Institute, Yseong, Daejeon 305-353, South Korea

Received 19 November 2008; Revised 2 March 2009; Accepted 22 April 2009

Academic Editor: Walter Ambrosini

Copyright © 2009 Peter Royl et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. P. Royl, U. J. Lee, Travis et al., 2007,
  2. P. Royl, P. U. J. Lee, J. R. Travis, and W. Breitung, “Benchmarking of the 3D CFD code GASFLOW II with containment thermal hydraulic tests from HDR and ThAI,” in Proceedings of the CFD4NRS Meeting, Munich, Germany, 2006.
  3. O. Auban, R. Zboray, and D. Paladino, “Investigation of large-scale gas mixing and stratification phenomena related to LWR containment studies in the PANDA facility,” Nuclear Engineering and Design, vol. 237, no. 4, pp. 409–419, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  4. D. Paladino, R. Zboray, P. Benz, and M. Andreani, “Three-gas-mixture plume inducing mixing and stratification in a multi-compartment containment,” in Proceedings of the 12th International Topical Meeting on Nuclear Reactor Thermal Hydraulics (NURETH 12), Pittsburgh, Pa, USA, 2007, abstract no. 195.
  5. M. Andreani, “Comparison between simulations and experiments,” in Proceedings of the 9th Meeting of the Program Review Group OECD SETH Project, Villingen, Germany, May 2005.
  6. M. Andreani, K. Haller, M. Heitsch et al., “A benchmark exercise on the use of CFD codes for containment issues using best practice guidelines: a computational challenge,” Nuclear Engineering and Design, vol. 238, no. 3, pp. 502–513, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. M. Andreani, D. Paladino, and T. George, “Simulations of basic gas mixing tests with condensation in the Panda facility using the Gothic code,” in Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Nuclear Engineering (ICONE '08), Orlando, Fla, USA, 2008.
  8. P. Royl, H. Rochholz, W. Breitung, J. R. Travis, and G. Necker, “Analysis of steam and hydrogen distributions with PAR mitigation in NPP containments,” Nuclear Engineering and Design, vol. 202, no. 2-3, pp. 231–248, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. P. Royl, J. R. Travis, W. Breitung, J. Kim, T. Kanzleiter, and S. Schwarz, “GASFLOW analysis of steam/hydrogen mixing with nitrogen in the OECD-NEA THAI HM-2 Benchmark,” in Proceedings of the NURETH 13, Kanazawa, Japan, September-October 2009, paper N13P1412.
  10. U. J. Lee, P. Royl et al., “Three dimensional analyis of steam-hydrogen distribution from a hypothetical small break severe accident in a VVER1000 type reactor containment using GASFLOW II,” in Proceedings of the NURETH-10 Conference, Seoul, Korea, 2003.