CFD Modeling of Wall Steam Condensation: Two-Phase Flow Approach versus Homogeneous Flow Approach

<table>Radial profile of the vertical gas velocity at <svg height="10.6875" id="M55" style="vertical-align:-0.0pt" version="1.1" viewbox="0 0 55.025002 10.6875" width="55.025002" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg">
<g transform="matrix(1.25,0,0,-1.25,0,10.6875)">
<g transform="translate(72,-63.45)">
<text transform="matrix(1,0,0,-1,-71.95,63.5)">
<tspan style="font-size: 12.50px; " x="0" y="0">𝑍</tspan>
<tspan style="font-size: 12.50px; " x="9.6523161" y="0">1</tspan>
<tspan style="font-size: 12.50px; " x="15.903816" y="0">4</tspan>
<tspan style="font-size: 12.50px; " x="25.618647" y="0">=</tspan>
<tspan style="font-size: 12.50px; " x="37.659035" y="0">4</tspan>
</text>
</g>
</g>
</svg> m: steady state 3 and 4.</table>

Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations

fig15

Figure 15

Figure 15: CFD Modeling of Wall Steam Condensation: Two-Phase Flow Approach versus Homogeneous Flow Approach 