Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations
Volume 2012, Article ID 293467, 10 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/293467
Research Article

Economic Analysis of Different Nuclear Fuel Cycle Options

Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute, Yuseong, Daejeon 305-353, Republic of Korea

Received 2 February 2012; Accepted 13 April 2012

Academic Editor: Katsuhisa Yamaguchi

Copyright © 2012 Won Il Ko and Fanxing Gao. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. OECD/NEA, The Economics of the Nuclear Fuel Cycle, OECD, Paris, France, 1994.
  2. B. Dixon, W. Halsey, S. Kim, G. Matthern, S. Piet, and D. Shropshire, Dynamic Systems Analysis Report for Nuclear Fuel Recycle, INL/EXT-08-15201 Rev.1, 2008.
  3. Economic Analysis Working Group. AFCI Economic Tools, Algorithms, and Methodology, INL/EXT-07-13293, 2009.
  4. J. M. Deutch and J. P. Holdren, The Future of Nuclear Power: An Interdisciplinary MIT Study, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Mass, USA, 2003.
  5. OECD/NEA, Advanced Nuclear Fuel Cycles and Radioactive Waste Management, NEA No. 5990, OECD, Paris, France, 2006.
  6. W. I. Ko, J. W. Choi, J. S. Lee, H. S. Park, and K. J. Lee, “Uncertainty analysis in DUPIC fuel-cycle cost using a probabilistic simulation method,” Nuclear Technology, vol. 127, no. 1, pp. 123–140, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. S. G. Hong et al., “600 MWe sodium cooled fast reactor core designs for efficient TRU transmutation,” The Korean Nuclear Society Spring Meeting, Chuncheon, Korea, May 2006. View at Google Scholar
  8. T. Inoue, “Actinide recycling by pyro-process with metal fuel FBR for future nuclear fuel cycle system,” Progress in Nuclear Energy, vol. 40, no. 3-4, pp. 547–554, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. B. H. Park, F. Gao, E. H. Kwon, and W. I. Ko, “Comparative study of different nuclear fuel cycle options: quantitative analysis on material flow,” Energy Policy, vol. 39, no. 11, pp. 6916–6924, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. M. Bunn, J. P. Holdren, S. Fetter, and B. Van Der Zwaan, “The economics of reprocessing versus direct disposal of spent nuclear fuel,” Nuclear Technology, vol. 150, no. 3, pp. 209–230, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. OECD/NEA, Accelerator-Driven Systems (ADS) and Fast Reactors (FR) in Advanced Nuclear Fuel Cycles, OECD, Paris, France, 2002.
  12. OECD, Cost Estimating Guidelines for Generation IV Nuclear Energy Systems, OECD, Paris, France, 2006.
  13. OECD, Trends in the Nuclear Fuel Cycle: Economic, Environment and Social Aspects, OECD, Paris, France, 2000.
  14. D. Shropshire et al., Advanced Fuel Cycle Cost Basis, INL/EXT-07-12107, 2007.
  15. D. Shropshire et al., Advanced Fuel Cycle Cost Basis, INL/EXT-07-12107 Rev.1, 2008.
  16. D. Shropshire et al., Advanced Fuel Cycle Cost Basis, INL/EXT-07-12107 Rev.2, 2009.
  17. The Ux Consulting Company, Weekly spot Ux U3O8 price, 2010, http://www.uxc.com/review/uxc_Prices.aspx.
  18. W. I. Ko, H. Choi, and M. S. Yang, “Economic analysis on direct use of spent pressurized water reactor fuel in candu reactors-IV: DUPIC fuel cycle cost,” Nuclear Technology, vol. 134, no. 2, pp. 167–186, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. W. I. Ko, J. W. Choi, C. H. Kang, J. S. Lee, and K. J. Lee, “Nuclear fuel cycle cost analysis using a probabilistic simulation technique,” Annals of Nuclear Energy, vol. 25, no. 10, pp. 771–789, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus