Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript

An erratum for this article has been published. To view the erratum, please click here.

Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations
Volume 2012 (2012), Article ID 384987, 6 pages
Research Article

Empirical Risk Analysis of Severe Reactor Accidents in Nuclear Power Plants after Fukushima

Softwareentwicklung & Umwelt-Consulting, Kienestraße 1a, 80933 München, Germany

Received 30 March 2012; Revised 1 August 2012; Accepted 3 August 2012

Academic Editor: Keith E. Holbert

Copyright © 2012 Jan Christian Kaiser. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. International Atomic Energy Agency, “Energy, Electricity and Nuclear Power Estimates for the Period up to 2050,” IAEA-RDS-1/31, IAEA, Vienna, Austria, 2011,
  2. International Atomic Energy Agency, “Nuclear Power Reactors in The World,” IAEA-RDS-2/31, IAEA, Vienna, Austria, 2011,
  3. International Atomic Energy Agency, “Information Series, Division of Public Information,” The International Nuclear and Radiological Event Scale (INES), IAEA, no. 08 24941/E,
  4. O. Morton, “The dream that failed,” The Economist, vol. 402, no. 8775, 2012,
  5. “Development and application of level 1 probabilistic safety assessment for nuclear power plants,” IAEA Safety Standards Series No. SSG-3, Vienna, Austria, 2010,
  6. “Development and application of level 2 probabilistic safety assessment for nuclear power plants,” IAEA Safety Standards Series No. SSG-4, Vienna, Austria, 2010,
  7. H. P. Berg, “Probabilistic safety assessment—a systematic and comprehensive method to evaluate risk,” Kerntechnik, vol. 74, no. 3, p. 95, 2009. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. H. P. Berg and C. Winter, “Analysis of external flooding and tsunamis for nuclear power plants at tidal rivers,” Kerntechnik, vol. 74, no. 3, pp. 132–139, 2009. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. G. Kauermann and H. Küchenhoff, “Nach Fukushima stellt sich die Risikofrage neu,” Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (FAZ), 2011,
  10. J. V. Linden, H. Löffler, D. Müller-Ecker, C. Verstegen, and K. Köberlein, Bewertung Des Unfallrisikos Fortschrittlicher Druckwasserreaktoren in Deutschland—Methoden Und Ergebnisse Einer Umfassenden Probabilistischen Sicherheitsanalyse (PSA), Gesellschaft für Anlagen- und Reaktorsicherheit (GRS), 2001.
  11. S. Rogers, “Nuclear power plant accidents: listed and ranked since 1952,”
  12. “List of civilian nuclear accidents,”
  13. J. D. Kalbfleisch and R. D. Prentice, The Statistical Analysis of Failure Time Data, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 2nd edition, 2002.
  14. W. Feller, An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications, vol. 1, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 3rd edition, 1968.
  15. F. Garwood, “Fiducial limits for the Poisson distribution,” Biometrika, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 437–442, 1936. View at Google Scholar
  16. B. S. Schoenberg, “Calculating confidence intervals for rates and ratios. Simplified method utilizing tabular values based on the Poisson distribution,” Neuroepidemiology, vol. 2, no. 3-4, pp. 257–265, 1983. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. K. Krishnamoorthy, Handbook of Statistical Distributions with Applications, vol. 188 of Statistics, Textbooks & Monographs, Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton, Fla, USA, 2006.
  18. J. C. Pezzullo, “Web Pages that Perform Statistical Calculations!,”
  19. US National Transportation Safety Board, “Aviation Statistical Reports 1991–2010, Table 2,”
  20. N. Howlader, A. M. Noone, M. Krapcho et al., Eds., SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2009 (Vintage 2009 Populations), National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Md, USA, 2012,