Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations
Volume 2012, Article ID 507921, 25 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/507921
Review Article

The Fukushima Event: The Outline and the Technological Background

San Piero a Grado Nuclear Research Group (GRNSPG), University of Pisa, 56122 Pisa, Italy

Received 12 May 2011; Accepted 4 October 2011

Academic Editor: Arkady Serikov

Copyright © 2012 Francesco D'Auria et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. M. Schneider, A. Froggatt, and S. Thomas, “Nuclear power in a post-fukushima world—25 years after the Chernobyl accident,” World Nuclear Industry Status Report, Worldwatch Institute, Washington, DC, USA, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  2. V. L. Sailor, K. R. Perkins, J. R. Weeks, and H. R. Connell, “Severe accident in spent fuel pools in support of generic safety issue 82,” Tech. Rep. NUREG/CR-4982, BNL-NUREG-52093, US NRC, Washington, DC, USA, 1987. View at Google Scholar
  3. R. Jack Dallman, W. J. Galyean, and K. C. Wagner, “Containment venting as an accident management strategy for BWRS with Mark I containments,” Nuclear Engineering and Design, vol. 121, no. 3, pp. 421–429, 1990. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. M. Lee and G. D. Lee, “Quantification of severe accidents source terms of BWR 4 reactor with Mark I containment using source term code package,” Nuclear Engineering and Design, vol. 138, no. 3, pp. 313–337, 1992. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. I. K. Madni, “Analysis of long term station blackout without automatic depressurization at peach bottom using melcor (version 1.8),” Tech. Rep. NUREG/CR-5850, BNL-NUREG 52319, US NRC, Washington, DC, USA, 1994. View at Google Scholar
  6. M. T. Leonard, R. O. Gauntt, and D. A. Power, “Accident source terms for boiling water reactors with high burn-up cores calculated using melcor 1.8.5,” Sandia Report SAND2007-7697, Sandia National Labs, New Mexico, USA, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  7. IAEA, Fundamental Safety Principles, SF-1, IAEA, Vienna, Austria, 2006.
  8. IAEA, Safety of Nuclear Power Plants: Design, NS-R-1, IAEA, Vienna, Austria, 2000.
  9. IAEA, Safety Requirements: Safety Assessment for Facilities and Activities, GS-R-4, IAEA, Vienna, Austria, 2008.
  10. IAEA, Deterministic Safety Analysis for NPPs, SSG-2, IAEA, Vienna, Austria, 2009.
  11. IAEA, Development and Application of Level 1 PSA for NPP, SSG-3, IAEA, Vienna, Austria, 2008.
  12. IAEA, Development and Application of Level 2 PSA for NPPs, SSG-4, IAEA, Vienna, Austria, 2009.
  13. IAEA, Severe Accident Management Programs for Nuclear Power Plants, NS-G-2.15, IAEA, Vienna, Austria, 2009.
  14. L. Morhbach, “Tohoku-Kanto Earthquake and Tsunami on March 11, 2011 and consequences for Northeast Honshu nuclear power plants,” VGB PowerTech, 2011.
  15. J.-Y. Kim and K.-S. Kang, “Assessment of the safety of ulchin nuclear power plant in the event of tsunami using parametric study,” Nuclear Engineering and Technology, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 175–186, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. L. Soffer, S. B. Burson, C. M. Ferrell, R. Y. Lee, and J. N. Ridgely, “Accident source terms for light-water nuclear power plants,” Tech. Rep. NUREG-1465, US NRC, Washington, DC, USA, 1995. View at Google Scholar
  17. T. Haste, J. Birchley, E. Cazzoli, and J. Vitazkova, “MELCOR/MACCS simulation of the TMI-2 severe accident and initial recovery phases, off-site fission product release and consequences,” Nuclear Engineering and Design, vol. 236, no. 10, pp. 1099–1112, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. UNSCEAR, Report of United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation to the General Assembly, UN, New York, NY, USA, 2000.
  19. TEPCO, The Great East Japan Earthquake and Current Status of Nuclear Power Stations, Tepco Power-Point, The Tokyo Electric Power Company, 2011.
  20. USNRC, “Report on the accident at the chernobyl nuclear power station,” Tech. Rep. NUREG-1250, USNRC, Washington, DC, USA, 1987. View at Google Scholar
  21. H. Specter and P. Bieniarz, “Is Mark I shell failure really important?—Part one,” Nuclear Engineering and Design, vol. 121, no. 3, pp. 441–446, 1990. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. C. R. Hyman, “Contain calculations of debris conditions adjacent to the BWR Mark I drywell shell during the later phases of a severe accident,” Nuclear Engineering and Design, vol. 121, no. 3, pp. 379–393, 1990. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. IAEA, Integral Design Concepts of Advanced Water Cooled Reactors, Tecdoc-977, IAEA, Vienna, Austria, 1995.
  24. Z. Hózer, A. Aszódi, M. Barnak et al., “Numerical analyses of an ex-core fuel incident: results of the OECD-IAEA Paks Fuel Project,” Nuclear Engineering and Design, vol. 240, no. 3, pp. 538–549, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. Z. Hózer, E. Szabó, T. Pintér et al., “Activity release from damaged fuel during the Paks-2 cleaning tank incident in the spent fuel storage pool,” Journal of Nuclear Materials, vol. 392, no. 1, pp. 90–94, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. Z. Hózer, M. Horváth, M. Kunstár et al., “Experimental simulation of the Paks-2 cleaning tank incident through separate effect and integral tests,” Nuclear Engineering and Design, vol. 241, pp. 573–581, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  27. M. Ramakrishnan, A. John Arul, S. Usha, and C. Senthil Kumar, “Estimation of station blackout frequency for Indian fast breeder test reactor,” Annals of Nuclear Energy, vol. 35, no. 12, pp. 2332–2337, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. USNRC, “Severe accident risk: an assessment for five US nuclear power plants,” Tech. Rep. NUREG-1150, USNRC, Washington, DC, USA, 1990. View at Google Scholar
  29. USNRC, “Initiation of the individual plant examination for severe accident vulnerabilities 10 CFR 50.54(f),” Generic Letter no 88-20, USNRC, Washington, DC, USA, 1989. View at Google Scholar
  30. USNRC, “Stress tests specifications,” Tech. Rep., Wenra Task Force, Bruxelles, Belgium, 2011. View at Google Scholar