Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations
Volume 2013, Article ID 316414, 7 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/316414
Research Article

Influence of the New Spanish Legislation concerning the Management of Nuclear Waste

Universidad P. Comillas, ETSI (ICAI), Cátedra Rafael Mariño de Nuevas Tecnologías Energéticas, C/ Alberto Aguilera 23, 28015 Madrid, Spain

Received 15 July 2013; Revised 24 September 2013; Accepted 25 September 2013

Academic Editor: Alejandro Clausse

Copyright © 2013 B. Yolanda Moratilla Soria and Ainhoa Villar Lejarreta. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. Spanish Nuclear Industry Forum, “Nuclear Results and Perspectives. 2011, a year of nuclear energy,” Annual Report, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  2. The Future of Nuclear Power: an interdisciplinary MIT study, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2003.
  3. G. de Roo and J. E. Parsons, “A methodology for calculating the levelized cost of electricity in nuclear power systems with fuel recycling,” Energy Economics, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 826–839, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. BCG, Economic Assessment of Used Nuclear Fuel Management in the United States, 2006.
  5. OECD/NEA, The Economics of the Nuclear Fuel Cycle, OECD, Paris, France, 1994.
  6. B. H. Park, F. Gao, E.-H. Kwon, and W. I. Ko, “Comparative study of different nuclear fuel cycle options: quantitative analysis on material flow,” Energy Policy, vol. 39, no. 11, pp. 6916–6924, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. L. B. Silverio and W. D. Q. Lamas, “An analysis of development and research on spent nuclear fuel reprocessing,” Energy Policy, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 281–289, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. Direct Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel, Harvard Kennedy School, Project on Managing the Atom.
  9. T. P. Lagus, “Reprocessing of spent nuclear fuel: a policy analysis,” Journal of Engineering and Public Policy, vol. 9, pp. 1–27, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  10. W. Ko and F. Gao, “Economic analysis of different nuclear fuel cycle options,” Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations, vol. 2012, Article ID 293467, 10 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. S. Widder, “Benefits and concerns of a closed nuclear fuel cycle,” Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy, vol. 2, no. 6, Article ID 062801, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  12. E. A. Schneider, M. R. Deinert, and K. B. Cady, “Cost analysis of the US spent nuclear fuel reprocessing facility,” Energy Economics, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 627–634, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. G. D. Recktenwald and M. R. Deinert, “Cost probability analysis of reprocessing spent nuclear fuel in the US,” Energy Economics, vol. 34, pp. 1873–1881, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  14. B. Y. Moratilla Soria, M. U. Mas, M. Estadieu, A. V. Lejarreta, and D. Echevarria-López, “Recycling versus long-term storage of nuclear fuel: economic factors,” Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations, vol. 2013, Article ID 417048, 7 pages, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. Spent Nuclear Fuel Management, “Recycling vs. direct disposal of spent nuclear fuel. Spanish study case,” 2013, http://www.iit.upcomillas.es/pfc/resumenes/519a5eb8a8a33.pdf .
  16. Proyecto de Ley de medidas fiscales para la sostenibilidad energética. (121/000025), 2013.