Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations
Volume 2013, Article ID 794037, 8 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/794037
Research Article

Assessment of Severe Accident Depressurization Valve Activation Strategy for Chinese Improved 1000 MWe PWR

School of Mechanical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 800 Dong Chuan Road, Shanghai 200240, China

Received 24 July 2013; Accepted 18 November 2013

Academic Editor: Bing Li

Copyright © 2013 Ge Shao et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. D. J. Hanson, D. W. Golden, R. Chambers et al., “Depressurization as an accident management strategy to minimize the consequences of direct containment heating,” Tech. Rep. NUREG/CR-5447, NRC, Washington, DC, USA, 1990. View at Google Scholar
  2. D. A. Brownson, “Intentional depressurization accident management strategy for PWR,” Tech. Rep. NUREG/CR-5937, NRC, Washington, DC, USA, 1993. View at Google Scholar
  3. J. O. Rodhe, B. W. Morris, and R. A. Bari, “Status of direct containment heating in CSNI member countries: report of task group on ex-vessel thermal-hydraulics,” Tech. Rep. NEA/CSNI-153, OECD NEA, Paris, France, 1989. View at Google Scholar
  4. U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, “Individual plant examination for severe accident vulnerabilities 10 CFR 50.54 (f). (Generic Letter No. 88-20),” Tech. Rep., NRC, Washington, DC, USA, 1988. View at Google Scholar
  5. Y. M. Kwon, H. S. Lim, and J. H. Song, “Design options for safety depressurization system,” Nuclear Engineering and Design, vol. 179, no. 3, pp. 287–296, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. R.-J. Park, S.-B. Kim, S.-W. Hong, and H.-D. Kim, “Detailed evaluation of coolant injection into the reactor vessel with RCS depressurization for high pressure sequences,” Nuclear Engineering and Design, vol. 239, no. 11, pp. 2484–2490, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. K. Zhang, X. W. Cao, J. Deng et al., “Evaluation of intentional depressurization strategy in Chinese 600 MWe PWR NPP,” Nuclear Engineering and Design, vol. 238, no. 7, pp. 1720–1727, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. H. Sjovall, “Severe accident management in olkiluoto 1 and 2,” in Proceedings of the OECD Workshop on the Implementation of Severe Accident Management Measures, PSI-Villigen, Switzerland, 2001.
  9. F. Bouteille, G. Azarian, D. Bittermann, J. Brauns, and J. Eyink, “The EPR overall approach for severe accident mitigation,” Nuclear Engineering and Design, vol. 236, no. 14–16, pp. 1464–1470, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, “Individual plant examination for severe accident vulnerabilities 10 CFR 50.54(f),” Tech. Rep., NRC, Washington, DC, USA, 1988. View at Google Scholar
  11. L. N. Kmetyk, R. K. Cole, R. C. Smith et al., “MELCOR 1.8.2 assessment: surry PWR TMLB' (with a DCH Study),” Tech. Rep. SAND93-1899, Sandia National Laboratories, Calif, USA, 1994. View at Google Scholar
  12. U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, “Severe accident risks: an assessment for five U.S. nuclear power plants,” Tech. Rep. UREG-1150, NRC, Washington, DC, USA, 1990. View at Google Scholar
  13. W. A. Stewart, A. T. Pieczynski, and V. Srinivas, “Experiments on natural circulation flows in steam generators during severe accidents,” in Proceedings of the International ANS/ENS Topical Meeting on Thermal Reactor Safety, San Diego, Calif, USA.
  14. G. M. Martinez, R. J. Gross, M. J. Martinez et al., “Independent review of SCDAP/RELAP 5 natural circulation calculations,” Tech. Rep. SAND91-2089, Sandia National Laboratories, 1994. View at Google Scholar
  15. C. Huh, N. Suh, and G.-C. Park, “Optimum RCS depressurization strategy for effective severe accident management of station black out accident,” Nuclear Engineering and Design, vol. 239, no. 11, pp. 2521–2529, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus