Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations
Volume 2014, Article ID 841895, 10 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/841895
Research Article

Containment Depressurization Capabilities of Filtered Venting System in 1000 MWe PWR with Large Dry Containment

Korea Hydro and Nuclear Power, Central Research Institute, 70 Gil, Yuseong-Daero 1312, Yuseong-Gu, Daejeon 305-343, Republic of Korea

Received 24 February 2014; Revised 26 May 2014; Accepted 29 May 2014; Published 22 June 2014

Academic Editor: Inn Seock Kim

Copyright © 2014 Sang-Won Lee et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. TEPCO, “Overview of the Earthquake & Tsunami and Nuclear Accident : The Great East Japan Earthquake and Current Status of Nuclear Power Stations,” 2011.
  2. B. De Boeck, “Prevention and mitigation measures to ensure containment integrity,” Nuclear Engineering and Design, vol. 209, no. 1–3, pp. 147–154, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. H. Tuomisto, “Filtered venting considerations of an ice condenser containment,” Nuclear Engineering and Design, vol. 117, no. 1, pp. 25–31, 1989. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. H. Rust, C. Tännler, W. Heintz, D. Haschke, M. Nuala, and R. Jakab, “Pressure release of containments during severe accidents in Switzerland,” Nuclear Engineering and Design, vol. 157, no. 3, pp. 337–352, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. R. O. Schlueter and R. P. Schmitz, “Filtered vented containments,” Nuclear Engineering and Design, vol. 120, no. 1, pp. 93–103, 1990. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. K. Bracht and M. Tiltmann, “Analysis of strategies for containment venting in case of severe accidents,” Nuclear Engineering and Design, vol. 104, no. 3, pp. 235–240, 1987. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. R. Jack Dallman, W. J. Galyean, and K. C. Wagner, “Containment venting as an accident management strategy for BWRS with Mark I containments,” Nuclear Engineering and Design, vol. 121, no. 3, pp. 421–429, 1990. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. D. L. Kelly, “Overview of containment venting as an accident mitigation strategy in US light water reactors,” Nuclear Engineering and Design, vol. 131, no. 2, pp. 253–261, 1991. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. F. Gazzillo and W. E. Kastenberg, “Risk reduction by filtered venting in PWR large dry-containments,” Nuclear Engineering and Design, vol. 77, no. 1, pp. 69–85, 1984. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. M. Gonzales-Cuesta, D. Okrent, and W. E. Kastenberg, “A study of risk reduction for some mitigation features for PWRs,” Nuclear Engineering and Design, vol. 75, no. 1, pp. 13–22, 1983. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. R. Schechtman and C. D. Heising, “Risk assessment of the beneficial impact of a filtered venting containment system in a PWR with large, dry containment,” Annals of Nuclear Energy, vol. 23, no. 8, pp. 641–661, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. G. Huang and L. Fang, “Feasibility research of containment venting for CANDU 6,” Nuclear Engineering and Design, vol. 268, pp. 113–120, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  13. K. Yuan, D. Q. Guob, L. L. Tong, and X. W. Cao, “Evaluation of containment venting strategy via VFS path for advanced passive PWR NPP,” Progress in Nuclear Energy, vol. 73, pp. 102–106, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. EPRI, “MAAP4-Modular Accident Analysis Program for LWR Power Plants,” 1994. View at Google Scholar
  15. K. Vierow, Y. Liao, J. Johnson, M. Kenton, and R. Gauntt, “Severe accident analysis of a PWR station blackout with the MELCOR, MAAP4 and SCDAP/RELAP5 codes,” Nuclear Engineering and Design, vol. 234, no. 1–3, pp. 129–145, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. EPRI, “Use of MAAP in support of Post-Fukushima Applications,” 2013.
  17. PWROG, “Severe Accident Management Guideline,” MUHP-2310, 1994.
  18. KHNP, “Probabilistic Safety Assessment for OPR1000 Containment Performance Analysis,” 2004.
  19. NRC, “Reactor Safety Study,” WASH-1400, 1975.