Research Article  Open Access
Burcu Akça, Salih Z. Erzeneoğlu, "The Mass Attenuation Coefficients, Electronic, Atomic, and Molecular Cross Sections, Effective Atomic Numbers, and Electron Densities for Compounds of Some Biomedically Important Elements at 59.5 keV", Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations, vol. 2014, Article ID 901465, 8 pages, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/901465
The Mass Attenuation Coefficients, Electronic, Atomic, and Molecular Cross Sections, Effective Atomic Numbers, and Electron Densities for Compounds of Some Biomedically Important Elements at 59.5 keV
Abstract
The mass attenuation coefficients for compounds of biomedically important some elements (Na, Mg, Al, Ca, and Fe) have been measured by using an extremely narrow collimatedbeam transmission method in the energy 59.5 keV. Total electronic, atomic, and molecular cross sections, effective atomic numbers, and electron densities have been obtained by using these results. Gammarays of ^{241}Am passed through compounds have been detected by a highresolution Si(Li) detector and by using energy dispersive Xray fluorescence spectrometer (EDXRF). Obtained results have been compared with theoretically calculated values of WinXCom and FFAST. The relative difference between the experimental and theoretical values are −9.4% to +11.9% with WinXCom and −11.8% to +11.7% FFAST. Results have been presented and discussed in this paper.
1. Introduction
The photon mass attenuation coefficient, effective atomic number, and electron density are the basic quantities required in determining the penetration of X and γray in matter. The mass attenuation coefficient is a measure of the probability of the interaction that occurs between incident photons and the matter of the unit mass per unit area. The knowledge of the mass attenuation coefficients of X and γray in biological and other important materials is of significant interest for industrial, biological, agricultural, and medical applications [1]. Additionally, the mass attenuation coefficient provides a wide variety of information about fundamental properties of the matter in the atomic and molecular level. Accurate values of the photon mass attenuation coefficients are required to provide essential data in diverse fields such as nuclear diagnostics (computerized tomography), radiation protection, nuclear medicine, radiation dosimetry, gamma ray fluorescence studies, and radiation biophysics. The mass attenuation coefficients are also widely used in the calculation of the photon penetration and the energy deposition in biological shielding and other dosimetric materials.
Biomedically important elements are those that are required by an organism to maintain its normal physiological function. Without biomedically important elements, the organism cannot complete its normal life cycle or achieve normal healthy growth; such elements are the key components of the metalloenzymes and are involved in crucial biological functions, such as oxygen transport, free radical scavenging, and hormonal activity. Biomedically important elements deficiency or excess with respect to the human physiological level are found in the patients with certain diseases, including cancer [2–4].
In the literature, a variety of experimental data relevant to the measurement of the mass attenuation coefficients of different samples is available. The mass attenuation coefficients, effective atomic numbers, and electron densities of some amino acids in the energy range 0.122–1.330 MeV have been carried out [5]. The mass attenuation coefficients for mono and disaccharides at photon energies 8.136, 13.596, 17.781, 22.581, and 32.890 keV have been measured [6]. The photon mass energy absorption coefficient for biological samples in the energy range 200–1500 keV has been measured [7]. The measured values have been compared with the computed values obtained using personal computer software package WinXCom [7].
In the present work, we have measured the mass attenuation coefficients, total electronic, atomic, and molecular cross sections, and effective atomic numbers and the electron densities have been obtained by using these results for Al, AlCl_{3}, Al(NO_{3})_{3}, Ca, CaSO_{4}, CaF_{2}, CaHPO_{4}, CaO_{6}C_{6}H_{10}, Fe, FeCl_{2}, FeCl_{3}, Fe_{2}(SO_{4})_{3}, Mg(NO_{3})_{2}, MgO, NaO_{2}C_{2}H_{3}, Na_{2}CO_{3}, NaF, NaNO_{3}, Na_{2}SO_{4}, NaCl, and Na_{2}SO_{3} in the energy 59.5 keV. The measured values have been compared with the theoretical ones calculated by using WinXCom and FFAST.
2. Theory
When γray beam passes through an absorber, it is attenuated. The degree of attenuation depends on the scattering and various absorption processes. The absorption coefficient can be derived from the LambertBeer law where is the incident γray intensity when measured without sample, is γrays intensity transmitted through the sample, and is the sample thickness (cm). The experimental massabsorption coefficient () of elements is given by where is the material density (g/cm^{3}). The theoretical massabsorption coefficient (cm^{2}/g) for any chemical compound or mixture of elements is given by mixture rule [1] where and are the weight fraction and mass attenuation coefficient of the th constituent element, respectively. does not depend on the particular phase (gas, liquid, or solid) of the material; therefore, it is useful to define the mass attenuation coefficient. For a chemical compound, the fraction by weight is given by Mass attenuation coefficients of the given materials have been calculated by the WinXCom program. This program which is based on the DOSbased compilation XCom [11] provides the total mass attenuation coefficient and the total attenuation crosssection data for about 100 elements as well as partial cross sections for incoherent and coherent scattering, photoelectric absorption, and pair production at energies from 1 keV to 100 GeV [12]. The values of the mass attenuation coefficients can be used to determine the total molecular cross section, , by the following relation [13]: where is the molecular weight and is Avogadro’s number. The total atomic crosssection can be easily determined from the following equation [13]: where is the fractional abundance of element with respect to the number of atoms; and are the number of formula units and the atomic weight, respectively, of the constituent element . The total electronic crosssection for the individual element is expressed by the following formula [14]: The total atomic and electronic cross sections are related to the effective atomic number () through the following relation: The effective electron number or electron density, (number of electrons per units mass), can be derived from [14–17] The average atomic weight or average atomic mass is the ratio of the molecular weight of the sample divided by the total number of the atoms of all types presented in the compound. can be derived from [14]
3. Experimental Setup
The schematical arrangement of the experimental setup used in this study is shown in Figure 1. It consists of a 3.7 × 10^{9} Bq (100 mCi) ^{241}Am point source, which essentially emits monoenergetic (59.5 keV) γrays. The powder samples have been compressed into pellets for 10 s at 15 ton by using a manual hydraulic press. Target has had a diameter of 13 mm. The powder samples have been prepared for four different mass that the best mass attenuation coefficients to obtain.  graphs have been drawn by using Origin Pro8. Slope of graphs has obtained linear attenuation coefficients and later the mass attenuation coefficients have obtained the linear attenuation coefficients of the samples divided by density of the samples. Sample graph for Al(NO_{3})_{3} is shown in Figure 2.
The intensities of γrays have been measured using a highresolution Si(Li) detector (FWHM of 160 eV at 5.96 keV) and the data were collected into 4096 channels of a multichannel analyzer. The spectra have been collected for a period of 1000 s. The counting electronics have included a pileup rejection circuit and a livetime clock used for dead time correction. The dead time has been observed for all the channels which vary at minimum 1.32% and at maximum 11.10%. A typical spectrum of 59.5 keV gamma ray transmissions through MgO is shown in Figure 3.
Theoretical values of mass attenuation coefficients for Al, AlCl_{3}, Al(NO_{3})_{3}, Ca, CaSO_{4}, CaF_{2}, CaHPO_{4}, CaO_{6}C_{6}H_{10}, Fe, FeCl_{2}, FeCl_{3}, Fe_{2}(SO_{4})_{3}, Mg(NO_{3})_{2}, MgO, NaO_{2}C_{2}H_{3}, Na_{2}CO_{3}, NaF, NaNO_{3,} Na_{2}SO_{4}, NaCl, and Na_{2}SO_{3} have been obtained using WinXCom [12] and FFAST [18].
In this study, effort has been made to reduce the error sources in transmission measurements. In an ideal transmission experiment, all photons must be sent on absorber sample with a parallel beam. But in real experimental studies, there is the same errors. The errors in the present measurements are mainly due to counting statistics, nonuniformity of the absorber, impurity content of the samples, and scattered photons reaching the detector. These errors are attributed to the deviation from the average value in the and (<1.3%), sample thickness (<0.7%), the mass of sample (<0.2%), and systematic errors (<0.8%). Also, the ratio of theoretical (T) and experimental (E) values is ≤1.1% The maximum errors in the mass attenuation coefficients have been calculated from errors in incident () and transmitted () intensities and areal density () by using the propagation of error formula where , , and are the errors in the intensities , , and thickness of the sample, respectively.
4. Results and Discussion
The theoretical mass attenuation coefficients, total electronic, atomic, and molecular crosssections, effective atomic numbers, and electron densities have been investigated by using WinXCom and FFAST. WinXCom is a program or dataset based on the mixture rule. The values in the FFAST dataset have been calculated by different methods and may produce different results. The experimental results are in good agreement with the theoretical values, calculated by WinXCom and FFAST. This study and other several studies have been compared in Table 1. To the best of our knowledge there are no experimental data reported in the literature other than those shown in Table 1 for these compounds at 59.5 keV γrays.
The theoretical and experimental mass attenuation coefficients, total electronic, atomic, and molecular crosssections, effective atomic numbers, and electron densities for compounds of biomedically important elements are listed in Tables 2, 3, and 4. It is clearly seen that the mass attenuation coefficient depends on chemical content.



The effective atomic number is a useful parameter for low and medium materials, encountered in biological and medical applications. It should be remembered that the concept of the effective atomic number is based on an underlying theory of Xray and γray interactions with matter [19]. In composite materials like alloys, soil, plastic, biological material, and so forth, for photon interactions, the atomic number cannot be represented uniquely across the entire energy region, as in the case of elements, by a single number. This number in composite materials is called “effective atomic number,” and it varies with energy [20]. The energy absorption in a given medium can be calculated if certain constants are known. These necessary constants are and electron density () of the medium. Therefore, the study of the effective atomic numbers of the biological samples is so useful for many technological applications. The effective atomic numbers are also useful in medical radiation dosimetry for the calculation of dose in radiation therapy and medical imaging [21]. The experimental effective atomic numbers are listed in Table 2. The effective atomic number for gamma ray interactions in materials composed of various elements cannot be expressed by a single number and for each of the partial processes the number has to be weighted differently [22]. A large generally corresponds to inorganic compounds and metals, while a small is an indicator of the organic substances [23]. Experimental determination of effective atomic number is important, and effective atomic number is studied as the only interpolation procedures and semiempirical expressions [16, 20, 22, 24–26]. The significant variation in effective atomic number is due to the relative dominance of the partial photon interaction processes. This confirms that effective atomic number depends on the number of elements and the range of atomic numbers in a compound. References [27, 28] confirm that the effective atomic numbers almost tend to be constant as a function of energy and attributes to the dominance of incoherent scattering and pair production in their respective energy region. But we have not confirmed this state, for our energy is below 100 keV (single energy 59.5 keV) and photoelectric cross sections are more dominant in respective energy region. [22, 29], especially, up to 50 keV. That is, the effective atomic number is affected by energy at <100 keV. The variation of effective atomic number with energy may be attributed to the relative domination of the partial processes, such as photoelectric effect, coherent scattering, incoherent scattering, and pair production. But at low energy, <100 keV, the photoelectric effect is dominant and so, the photoelectric effect is responsible for the change in the energy of effective atomic number.
The present experimental results are in accordance with the theoretical results. But the experimental results give better agreement with results of WinXCom. So, the present experimental work upholds the suitability of the WinXCom that estimated values by using the mixture rule. Such results have been observed by earlier investigators [30–32]. It is evident from Tables 2, 3, and 4 that the experimental values are in accord with the WinXCom values within the estimated error −9.4% to +11.9% and FFAST −11.8% to +11.7%. This may be attributed to the effects of chemical environment on value. The values are believed to be affected by the chemical, molecular, and thermal environments. These phenomena led to the deviation of the experimental value from that of the theoretical value, since the calculation of the theoretical value has been done by considering the cross section for an isolated atom. This deviation is termed as the breakdown or no validity of the mixture rule. Such effects have been observed by earlier investigators [33–38]. It is observed that the experimental value deviates by WinXCom +7.9% and FFAST +4.6% for Na_{2}SO_{4}, in order of −4.9% and −7.3% for Mg(NO_{3})_{2}, +2.9 and −0.5% for Al(NO_{3})_{3}, −9.3% and −11.7% for Fe_{2}(SO_{4})_{3}, and −4.9% and −6.9% for CaO_{6}C_{6}H_{10}. In this case, we have concluded that these deviations may not be directly explained by the number of the atoms increasing or decreasing in a compound. We have not confirmed that when the number of atoms in a compound increases, the significant differences between experimental and theoretical values are observed for these compounds. In this respect, the validity of the mixture rule cannot be interpreted according to the number of atoms in a composition. It is important for compounds that the chemical environmental effect and molecular bonding are neglected by mixture rule. Such effects have been observed by earlier investigators [33, 34, 39, 40]. According to relative differences, there are the adaptation between experimental and theoretical (WinXCom) values for Al and FeCl_{2}. The differences between experimental and theoretical results may be attributed to chemical composition variations of the samples and mixture rule neglects present composition. Present results clearly reveal that the incapability of the mixture rule supports the new and sensitive experimental methods more than the semiempirical expressions and interpolation processes. The total experimental uncertainty of the measured quantity depends on the uncertainties of the thickness and the mass, while the uncertainty of the and measurement scarcely influences the results since both and have been measured with very good statistics (<1.3%). It is observed from Tables 2, 3, and 4 that the mass attenuation coefficients, total electronic, atomic, and molecular cross sections, effective atomic numbers, and electron densities are closely related to FeCl_{2} and FeCl_{3} compounds. As seen in Tables 2, 3, and 4, the mass attenuation coefficients, total electronic, atomic, and molecular cross sections, effective atomic numbers, and electron densities for Na compounds do not change. Sodium is low, so its compounds will not see a significantly large change in average . At low energies such as this, 60 keV, the main effects in photon absorption are the photoelectric effect and Compton scattering; these are dominated by the presence of the electrons in the material and the effects from the nuclei are only a perturbation, largely in the different binding energy of the electrons; inner electrons in higher materials have a higher binding energy. So really one will expect that the dominant effect in absorption and scattering will be the electron density in the material, which is calculable with knowledge of the stoichiometric ratio of the elements in the compound or mixture and the density.
Further experimental studies on measurements of the mass attenuation coefficients, molecular, atomic, and total electronic cross sections, effective atomic numbers, and electron densities for compounds of biomedically important some elements will be useful to confirm, understand, and interpret the observed differences between the measured and calculated results. Also in order to reach more definitive conclusions on measurements, we project to extend these measurements for various compounds and different primer energies.
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.
References
 D. F. Jackson and D. J. Hawkes, “Xray attenuation coefficients of elements and mixtures,” Physics Reports, vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 169–233, 1981. View at: Google Scholar
 R. K. Murray, D. K. Granner, P. A. Mayes, and V. W. Rodwell, Harpers Biochemistry, McGrawHill, Health Profession Division, 25th edition, 2000.
 V. K. Malhotra, Biochemistry for Students, Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers, New Delhi, India, 10th edition, 1998.
 V. W. Hays and M. J. Swenson, “Minerals and bones,” in Dukes' Physiology of Domestic Animals, 10th edition, 1985. View at: Google Scholar
 P. P. Pawar and G. K. Bichile, “Studies on mass attenuation coefficient, effective atomic number and electron density of some amino acids in the energy range 0.1221.330MeV,” Radiation Physics and Chemistry, vol. 92, pp. 22–27, 2013. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 B. R. Kerur, V. T. Manjula, M. T. Lagare, and S. A. Kumar, “Mass attenuation coefficient of saccharides for Xrays in the energy range from 8 keV to 32 keV,” Radiation Measurements, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 63–67, 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 V. Manjunathaguru and T. K. Umesh, “Simple parametrization of photon mass energy absorption coefficients of H, C, N and Obased samples of biological interest in the energy range 200–1500 keV,” Pramana  Journal of Physics, vol. 72, no. 2, pp. 375–387, 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 R. C. Murty, “Effective atomic numbers of heterogeneous materials,” Nature, vol. 207, no. 4995, pp. 398–399, 1965. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 P. Latha, A. M. Vinodkumar, K. M. Varier et al., “Effective atomic numbers for gamma ray interaction at 59.54keV in heterogeneous layers of materials using^{241}Am gamma rays,” Radiation Physics and Chemistry, vol. 81, no. 12, pp. 1817–1822, 2012. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. O. Pereira, C. D. C. Conti, M. J. Dos Anjos, and R. T. Lopes, “Correction of radiation absorption on biological samples using Rayleigh to Compton scattering ratio,” Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms, vol. 280, no. 1, pp. 39–44, 2012. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. J. Berger and J. H. Hubbell, “XCOM: Photon Cross Sections Database.Web Version 1.2,” National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Md, USA, 1987, http://www.nist.gov/pml/data/xcom/. View at: Google Scholar
 L. Gerward, N. Guilbert, K. B. Jensen, and H. Levring, “WinXCom—a program for calculating Xray attenuation coefficients,” Radiation Physics and Chemistry, vol. 71, no. 34, pp. 653–654, 2004. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 K. Singh and L. Gerward, “Summary of existing information on gammaray and Xray attenuation coefficients of solutions,” Indian Journal of Pure and Applied Physics, vol. 40, no. 9, pp. 643–649, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
 S. R. Manohara, S. M. Hanagodimath, and L. Gerward, “Energy dependence of effective atomic numbers for photon energy absorption and photon interaction: studies of some biological molecules in the energy range 1 keV20 MeV,” Medical Physics, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 388–402, 2008. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 S. R. Manohara and S. M. Hanagodimath, “Studies on effective atomic numbers and electron densities of essential amino acids in the energy range 1 keV100 GeV,” Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms, vol. 258, no. 2, pp. 321–328, 2007. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 V. Manjunathaguru and T. K. Umesh, “Effective atomic numbers and electron densities of some biologically important compounds containing H, C, N and O in the energy range 145–1330 keV,” Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics, vol. 39, no. 18, article 025, pp. 3969–3981, 2006. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 S. Gowda, S. Krishnaveni, and R. Gowda, “Studies on effective atomic numbers and electron densities in amino acids and sugars in the energy range 301333 keV,” Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms, vol. 239, no. 4, pp. 361–369, 2005. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 C. T. Chantler, K. Olsen, R. A. Dragoset et al., XRay form Factor, Attenuation and Scattering Tables (Version 2.1), National Institute of Standards and Technology, 2005, http://www.nist.gov/pml/data/ffast/index.cfm.
 S. R. Manohara, S. M. Hanagodimath, K. S. Thind, and L. Gerward, “The effective atomic number revisited in the light of modern photoninteraction crosssection databases,” Applied Radiation and Isotopes, vol. 68, no. 45, pp. 784–787, 2010. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 S. G. Prasad, K. Parthasaradhi, and W. D. Bloomer, “Effective atomic numbers for photoabsorption in alloys in the energy region of absorption edges,” Radiation Physics and Chemistry, vol. 53, no. 5, pp. 449–453, 1998. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 G. J. Hine, “The effective atomic numbers of materials for various gamma ray interactions,” Physical Review, vol. 85, pp. 725–737, 1952. View at: Google Scholar
 T. Kiran Kumar, S. Venkataratnam, and K. Venkata Reddy, “Effective atomic number studies in clay minerals for total photon interaction in the energy region 10 keV10 MeV,” Radiation Physics and Chemistry, vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 707–710, 1996. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 H. Baltaş and U. Çevik, “Determination of the effective atomic numbers and electron densities for YBaCuO superconductor in the range 59.5–136 keV,” Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms, vol. 266, no. 7, pp. 1127–1131, 2008. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Shivaramu, “Effective atomic numbers for photon energy absorption and photon attenuation of tissues from human organs,” Medical Dosimetry, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2002. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 G. Kaur, K. Singh, B. S. Lark, and H. S. Sahota, “Photon interaction studies in solutions of some alkali metal chlorides  I,” Radiation Physics and Chemistry, vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 315–323, 2000. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 K. Siddappa, N. G. Nayak, K. M. Balakrishna, and N. Lingappa, “Experimental effective atomic numbers for the photoelectric process in some alloys at 84 and 145 keV,” Nuclear Science and Engineering, vol. 93, no. 1, pp. 57–61, 1986. View at: Google Scholar
 K. Singh, H. Singh, V. Sharma et al., “Gammaray attenuation coefficients in bismuth borate glasses,” Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms, vol. 194, no. 1, pp. 1–6, 2002. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 G. S. Bhandal and K. Singh, “Total and partial mass attenuation coefficients and effective atomic number studies in different solid state nuclear track detectors,” Radiation Physics and Chemistry, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 109–116, 1996. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 V. Ramprasath, “Effective atomic numbers for photon energy absorption and energy dependence of some thermoluminescent dosimetric compounds,” Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms, vol. 168, no. 3, pp. 294–304, 2000. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 B. S. Sidhu, A. S. Dhaliwal, K. S. Mann, and K. S. Kahlon, “Study of mass attenuation coefficients, effective atomic numbers and electron densities for some low Z compounds of dosimetry interest at 59.54 keV incident photon energy,” Annals of Nuclear Energy, vol. 42, pp. 153–157, 2012. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 N. Chanthima and J. Kaewkhao, “Calculation of mass attenuation coefficient and related parameters Of BaOSiO_{2} glass system By WinXCom and FFAST,” in Proceedings of the 38th Congress on Science and Technology of Thailand (STT38 '12), Chiang Mai, Thailand, October 2012. View at: Google Scholar
 J. L. Glover, C. T. Chantler, Z. Barnea, N. A. Rae, and C. Q. Tran, “Measurement of the Xray massattenuation coefficients of gold, derived quantities between 14 keV and 21 keV and determination of the bond lengths of gold,” Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics, vol. 43, Article ID 085001, 2010. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 O. İçelli, S. Erzeneoğlu, and R. Boncukçuoğlu, “Measurement of mass attenuation coefficients of some boron compounds and the trommel sieve waste in the energy range 15.746–40.930 keV,” Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer, vol. 78, no. 2, pp. 203–210, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
 U. Turgut, O. Simşek, E. Büyükkasap, and M. Ertuğrul, “Xray attenuation coefficients at different energies and the validity of the mixture rule for compounds around the absorption edge,” Spectrochimica Acta B, vol. 57, pp. 261–266, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
 B. R. Kerur, S. R. Thontadarya, and B. Hanumaiah, “A study on the range of nonvalidity of the Bragg's additivity law for compounds at photon energies below 10 keV,” Applied Radiation and Isotopes, vol. 43, no. 7, pp. 893–898, 1992. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 B. R. Kerur, S. R. Thontadarya, and B. Hanumaiah, “Xray attenuation coefficients at 6.46 keV and the validity of the mixture rule for compounds,” XRay Spectrom, vol. 22, pp. 13–16, 1993. View at: Google Scholar
 A. T. L. Tan, V. Lakshminarayana, I. S. Giles, and A. Rajaratnam, “Photon crosssection measurements at low energies in some bromides,” Nuovo Cimento, vol. 99, no. 5, pp. 587–594, 1988. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 V. Lakshminarayana, A. T. L. Tan, I. S. Giles, and A. Rajaratnam, “Gamma crosssections close to the absorption edge in some bromides,” Il Nuovo Cimento A, vol. 91, no. 4, pp. 331–338, 1986. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 O. İçelli and S. Erzeneoğlu, “The mass attenuation coeffcients in some vanadium and nickel compounds,” Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer, vol. 88, pp. 519–524, 2004. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Ö. Sögüt, S. Seven, E. Baydas, E. Büyükkasap, and A. Küçükönder, “Chemical effects on Kβ/Kα Xray intensity ratios of Mo, Ag, Cd, Ba, La, Ce compounds and total mass attenuation coefficients of Fe and Cu,” Spectrochimica Acta B: Atomic Spectroscopy, vol. 56, no. 8, pp. 1367–1374, 2001. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
Copyright
Copyright © 2014 Burcu Akça and Salih Z. Erzeneoğlu. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.