Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations
Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 980418, 10 pages
Research Article

Extended Station Blackout Coping Capabilities of APR1400

Korea Hydro and Nuclear Power, Central Research Institute, 70 Gil, Yuseong-Daero 1312, Yuseong-Gu, Daejeon 305-343, Republic of Korea

Received 17 January 2014; Revised 16 April 2014; Accepted 29 April 2014; Published 25 May 2014

Academic Editor: Enrico Zio

Copyright © 2014 Sang-Won Lee et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. U.S. NRC, “Station Blackout,” Regulatory Guideline 1.155, 1988.
  2. U.S. NRC, “Station Blackout Rule,” Regulations Title 10 Code of Federal Regulations, 1988.
  3. KHNP, “Probabilistic safety assessment and severe accident,” APR1400 Standard Safety Analyses Report, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  4. TEPCO, Overview of the Earthquake & Tsunami and Nuclear Accident : The Great East Japan Earthquake and Current Status of Nuclear Power Stations, 2011.
  5. T. Watanabe, M. Ishigaki, and M. Hirano, “Analysis of BWR long-term station blackout accident using TRAC-BF1,” Annals of Nuclear Energy, vol. 49, pp. 223–226, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. A. Prošek and L. Cizelj, “Long-term station blackout accident analyses of a PWR with RELAP5/MOD3.3,” Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations, vol. 2013, Article ID 851987, 15 pages, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  7. A. Volkanovski and A. Prošek, “Extension of station blackout coping capability and implications on nuclear safety,” Nuclear Engineering and Design, vol. 255, pp. 16–27, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. S.-Y. Park and K.-I. Ahn, “Comparative analysis of station blackout accident progression in typical PWR, BWR, and PHWR,” Nuclear Engineering and Technology, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 311–322, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. U.S. NRC, Recommendations for Enhancing Reactor Safety in the 21st Century, The Near-Term Task Force Review of Insight from the Fukushima Dai-ichi Accident, 2011.
  10. PWROG, Emergency Procedure Guidelines Rev.5.2, CEN-152, 2001.
  11. PWROG, Severe Accident Management Guideline, MUHP-2310, 1994.
  12. KHNP, Emergency Operational Guidelines for APR1400, Rev.01, 2002.
  13. KHNP, APR1400 Severe Accident Management Guideline, 2012.
  14. S. J. Cho, B. S. Kim, M. G. Kang, and H. G. Kim, “The development of passive design features for the Korean Next Generation Reactor,” Nuclear Engineering and Design, vol. 201, no. 2, pp. 259–271, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. EPRI, MAAP4-Modular Accident Analysis Program for LWR Power Plants, 1994.
  16. K. Vierow, Y. Liao, J. Johnson, M. Kenton, and R. Gauntt, “Severe accident analysis of a PWR station blackout with the MELCOR, MAAP4 and SCDAP/RELAP5 codes,” Nuclear Engineering and Design, vol. 234, no. 1–3, pp. 129–145, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. C. H. Park, D. Y. Lee, I. J. U. C. Lee, K. Y. Suh, and G. C. Park, “Comparative study of loss-of-coolant accident using MAAP4.03 and RELAP5/MOD3.2.2,” in Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Nuclear Engineering (ICONE '02), pp. 22032.1–22032.8, April 2002. View at Scopus
  18. J. Hwan Jeong, M. G. Na, S. P. Kim, and J. Woon Park, “Analysis of severe accident scenarios in APR1400 using MAAP4 code,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Atomic Physics (ICAPP '02), 2002.
  19. Westinghouse, WOG2000 RCP Seal Leakage Model for Westinghouse PWRs, 2002.