Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations
Volume 2015, Article ID 143767, 9 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/143767
Review Article

CANDU Safety R&D Status, Challenges, and Prospects in Canada

1Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission, 280 Slater Street, Ottawa, ON, Canada K1P 5S9
2CANDU Owners Group, 655 Bay Street, 17th Floor, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 2K4

Received 10 June 2014; Accepted 29 October 2014

Academic Editor: Bo Wook Rhee

Copyright © 2015 W. Shen and F. Doyle. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. “Generic safety issues for nuclear power plants with pressurized heavy water reactors and measures for their resolution,” Tech. Rep. TECDOC-1554, IAEA, 2007.
  2. CSA Standard, “Technical requirements for in-service evaluation of Zirconium alloy pressure tubes in CANDU reactors,” Canadian Standards Association N285.8-10, CSA, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  3. S. M. Petoukhov and P. M. Mathew, “Status of MAAP4-CANDU code development and simulations of severe core damage accidents for a generic CANDU plant,” in Proceedings to the Technical Meeting on Severe Accident and Accident Management Toranomon Pastoral, Tokyo, Japan, March 2006.
  4. B. N. Hanna, “CATHENA: a thermalhydraulic code for CANDU analysis,” Nuclear Engineering and Design, vol. 180, no. 2, pp. 113–131, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. D. Altiparmakov, W. Shenb, G. Marleau, and B. Rouben, “Evolution of computer codes for CANDU analysis,” in Proceedings of Advances in Reactor Physics to Power the Nuclear Renaissance (PHYSOR '10), Pittsburgh, Pa, USA, May 2010.
  6. D. Altiparmakov, “New capabilities of the lattice code WIMS-AECL,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on the Physics of Reactors (PHYSOR '08), pp. 635–642, Interlaken, Switzerland, September 2008. View at Scopus
  7. G. Marleau, A. Hébert, and R. Roy, “A user guide for DRAGON 3.06,” Report IGE-174 Rev. 7, École Polytechnique de Montréal, Québec, Canada, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  8. W. Shen and P. Schwanke, “Evolution of RFSP 3.5 for CANDU analysis,” in Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Conference of the Canadian Nuclear Society (CNS '12), pp. 1277–1288, Saskatoon, Canada, June 2012. View at Scopus
  9. H. H. Wong, E. Alp, W. R. Clendening, M. Tayal, and L. R. Jones, “ELESTRES: a finite element fuel model for normal operating conditions,” Journal of Nuclear Technology, vol. 57, pp. 203–212, 1982. View at Google Scholar
  10. A. F. Williams, “The ELOCA fuel modelling code: past, present, and future,” in Proceedings of the 9th International CNS CANDU Fuel Conference, 2005.
  11. “2010 Annual CNSC staff report on the safety performance of canadian nuclear power plants,” in Proceedings of the CNSC Technical Document for Public Meeting, CMD:11-M46, 2011.
  12. P. Purdy, “A composite analytical solution for large break LOCA,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Future of Heavy Water Reactors (HWR-FUTURE '11), Ontario, Canada, October 2011.
  13. J. Hopwood, “A robust reactor,” Nuclear Plant Journal, vol. 32, no. 1, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  14. H. Z. Fan, T. Laurie, A. Siddiqi et al., “Safety assessment to support NUE fuel full core implementation in CANDU reactors,” in Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on CANDU Fuel, Kingston, Canada, September 2013.
  15. C. M. Cottrell, M. Boubcher, M. J. Chen, Z. H. Zhang, and S. Kuran, “Natural uranium equivalent (NUE) fuel: full core use of recycled uranium and depleted uranium in CANDU reactors,” in Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Nuclear Engineering (ICONE '13), Chengdu, China, July-August 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. M. J. Chen, Z. H. Zhang, and Z. L. Meng, “CANDU position and prospect in China,” in Proceedings of the 26th Canadian Nuclear Sociate Annual Conference, Toronto, Canada, June 2013.
  17. B. A. Shalaby, V. G. Snell, and B. Rouben, “UNENE: an update on nuclear education and research,” in Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Canadian Nuclear Society, Toronto, Canada, May 2010.
  18. U.S. DOE Nuclear Energy Research Advisory Committee and the Generation IV International Forum, “A technology roadmap for generation IV nuclear energy systems,” Tech. Rep. GIF-002-00, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  19. C. K. Chow and H. F. Khartabil, “Conceptual fuel channel designs fro CANDU—SCWR,” Nuclear Engineering and Technology, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 139–146, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. L. K. H. Leung, M. Yetisir, W. Diamond et al., “A next generation heavy water nuclear reactor with supercritical water as coolant,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Future of Heavy Water Reactors (HWR-Future '11), Canadian Nuclear Society, Ottawa, Canada, October 2011.
  21. W. Shen, “Assessment of the traditional neutron-diffusion core-analysis method for the analysis of the Super Critical Water Reactor,” Annals of Nuclear Energy, vol. 45, pp. 1–7, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. Y. Guo, “Regulatory review of the CANDU Fuel Modification program in Canada,” in Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on CANDU Fuel, Kingston, Ontario, Canada, September 2013.
  23. K. Shaheen, M. E. Shawkat, A. I. Popescu, and H. Hasanein, “Assessing the impact of the 37M fuel bundle design on fuel safety parameters,” in Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on CANDU Fuel, Kingston, Ontario, Canada, September 2013.
  24. CNSC Regulatory Document, “Aging Management for Nuclear Power Plants,” RD 334, 2011.