Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations
Volume 2015, Article ID 238723, 10 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/238723
Research Article

Improved Modelling and Assessment of the Performance of Firefighting Means in the Frame of a Fire PSA

GRS gGmbH, Boltzmannstraße 14, 85748 Garching, Germany

Received 31 October 2014; Accepted 15 January 2015

Academic Editor: Francesco Di Maio

Copyright © 2015 Martina Kloos and Joerg Peschke. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. Y. Adolfsson, J. E. Holmberg, G. Hultqvist, P. Kudinov, and I. Männistö, Eds., Proceedings of the Deterministic/Probabilistic Safety Analysis Workshop, VTT-R-07266-11, VTT, Espoo, Finland, 2011.
  2. Y. Adolfsson et al., in Proceedings of IDPSA-Integrated Deterministic-Probabilistic Safety Assessment, 2nd Workshop, KTH, Stockholm, Sweden, November 2012.
  3. T. Aldemir, “A survey of dynamic methodologies for probabilistic safety assessment of nuclear power plants,” Annals of Nuclear Energy, vol. 52, pp. 113–124, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. M. Kloos and J. Peschke, “MCDET—a probabilistic dynamics method combining Monte Carlo simulation with the discrete dynamic event tree approach,” Nuclear Science and Engineering, vol. 153, no. 2, pp. 137–156, 2006. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. M. Kloos, J. Hartung, J. Peschke, and J. Scheuer, “Updates and current application of the MCDET simulation tool for dynamic PSA,” in Proceedings of the International Topical Meeting on Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Analysis (PSA '13), pp. 2446–2457, Columbia, SC, USA, September 2013. View at Scopus
  6. K. McGrattan, S. Hostikka, R. McDermott, J. Floyd, C. Weinschenk, and K. Overholt, Fire Dynamics Simulator, Technical Reference Guide, Volume 1: Mathematical Model, NIST, Gaithersburg, Md, USA; VTT, Espoo, Finland, 6th edition, 2013.
  7. M. Kloos and J. Peschke, “Consideration of human actions in combination with the probabilistic dynamics method MCDET,” Journal of Risk and Reliability, vol. 222, pp. 303–313, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  8. M. Kloos, J. Hartung, J. Peschke, and M. Röwekamp, “Advanced probabilistic dynamics analysis of fire fighting actions in a Nuclear Power Plant with the MCDET tool,” in Proceedings of the European Safety and Reliability Conference (ESREL '13), pp. 555–562, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, October 2013. View at Scopus
  9. R. O. Gauntt, R. K. Cole, C. M. Erickson et al., MELCOR Computer Code Manuals. Volume 1: Primer and Users’ Guide, Version 1.8.5, NUREG/CR-6119 Revision 2, SAND2000-2417/1, 2000.
  10. H. Austregesilo, C. Bals, A. Hora, G. Lerchl, and P. Romstedt, ATHLET Mod 2.0. Models and Methods.GRS-P-1, vol. 4, Gesellschaft für Anlagen- und Reaktorsicherheit (GRS) gGmbH, Garching, Germany, 2003.
  11. A. Amendola and G. Reina, DYLAM-1, A Software Package for Event Sequence and Consequence Spectrum Methodology, EUR-924, CEC-JRC ISPRA, Commission of the European Communities, Ispra, Italy, 1984. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. G. Cojazzi, “The DYLAM approach for the dynamic reliability analysis of systems,” Reliability Engineering and System Safety, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 279–296, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. K. S. Hsueh and A. Mosleh, “The development and application of the accident dynamic simulator for dynamic probabilistic risk assessment of nuclear power plants,” Reliability Engineering and System Safety, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 297–314, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. Y. C. Chang and A. Mosleh, “Dynamic PRA using ADS with RELAP5 code as its thermal hydraulic module,” in PSAM 4, A. Mosleh and R. Bari, Eds., pp. 2468–2473, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 1998. View at Google Scholar
  15. J. M. Izquierdo, J. Hortal, M. Sánchez, and E. Meléndez, “Automatic generation of dynamic event trees: a tool for integrated safety assessment,” in Reliability and Safety Assessment of Dynamic Process Systems, T. Aldemir, N. Siu, A. Mosleh, P. C. Cacciabue, and B. G. Goktepe, Eds., vol. 120 of NATO ASI Series, pp. 135–150, Springer, Heidelberg, Germany, 1994. View at Google Scholar
  16. R. Munoz, E. Minguez, E. Melendez, J. M. Izquierdo, and M. Sanchez-Perea, “DENDROS: A second generation scheduler for dynamic event trees,” in Mathematics and Computation, M&C ’99—Madrid, J. M. Aragones, C. Ahnert, and O. Cabellos, Eds., pp. 1358–1367, Senda Editorial, Madrid, Spain, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  17. U. Catalyurek, B. Rutt, K. Metzroth et al., “Development of a code-agnostic computational infrastructure for the dynamic generation of accident progression event trees,” Reliability Engineering & System Safety, vol. 95, no. 3, pp. 278–294, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. C. Rabiti, A. Alfonsi, J. Cogliati, D. Mandelli, and R. Kinoshita, “RAVEN, a new software for dynamic risk analysis,” in Proceedings of the PSAM 12-Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA, 2014.
  19. S. S. Wilks, “Statistical prediction with special reference to the problem of tolerance limits,” Annals of Mathematical Statistics, vol. 13, pp. 400–409, 1942. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  20. S. S. Wilks, “Determination of sample sizes for setting tolerance limits,” Annals of Mathematical Statistics, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 91–96, 1941. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  21. M. Kloos, SUSA—Software for Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analyses (Version 3.6). GRS-P-5, Gesellschaft für Anlagen- und Reaktorsicherheit (GRS) gGmbH, Garching, Germany, 2008.
  22. S. Babst, B. Forell, W. Frey et al., Methoden zur Durchführung von Brand-PSA im Nichtleistungsbetrieb. GRS-A-3579, Gesellschaft für Anlagen- und Reaktorsicherheit (GRS) gGmbH, Cologne, Germany, 2011.