Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations
Volume 2015, Article ID 308163, 14 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/308163
Research Article

A Flooding Induced Station Blackout Analysis for a Pressurized Water Reactor Using the RISMC Toolkit

Idaho National Laboratory (INL), 2525 Fremont Avenue, Idaho Falls, ID 83415, USA

Received 18 December 2014; Accepted 17 May 2015

Academic Editor: Borut Mavko

Copyright © 2015 Diego Mandelli et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. C. Smith, C. Rabiti, and R. Martineau, “Risk informed safety margins characterization (RISMC) pathway technical program plan,” Tech. Rep. INL/EXT-11-22977, Idaho National Laboratory, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  2. D. Gaston, C. Newman, G. Hansen, and D. Lebrun-Grandié, “MOOSE: a parallel computational framework for coupled systems of nonlinear equations,” Nuclear Engineering and Design, vol. 239, no. 10, pp. 1768–1778, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. D. Andrs, R. Berry, D. Gaston et al., “RELAP-7 level 2 milestone report: demonstration of a steady state single phase PWR simulation with RELAP-7,” Tech. Rep. INL/EXT-12-25924, Idaho National Laboratory, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  4. A. Alfonsi, C. Rabiti, D. Mandelli, J. Cogliati, and R. Kinoshita, “Raven as a tool for dynamic probabilistic risk assessment: software overview,” in Proceeding of M&C International Topical Meeting on Mathematics and Computation, CD-ROM, American Nuclear Society, LaGrange Park, Ill, USA, 2013.
  5. C. Rabiti, A. Alfonsi, D. Mandelli, J. Cogliati, R. Martinueau, and C. Smith, “Deployment and overview of RAVEN capabilities for a probabilistic risk assessment demo for a PWR station blackout,” Idaho National Laboratory Report INL/EXT-13-29510, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  6. B. Spencer, Y. Zhang, P. Chakraborty et al., “Grizzly year-end progress report,” Idaho National Laboratory Report, Idaho National Laboratory, INL/EXT-13-30316, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  7. RELAP5 Code Development Team, RELAP5-3D Code Manual, INL, 2012.
  8. E. Zio, M. Marseguerra, J. Devooght, and P. E. Labeau, “A concept paper on dynamic reliability via Monte Carlo simulation,” Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, vol. 47, no. 2–5, pp. 371–382, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. A. Amendola and G. Reina, “Dylam-1, a software package for event sequence and consequence spectrum methodology,” EUR-924, CEC-JRC, Commission of the European Communities, Ispra, Italy, 1984. View at Google Scholar
  10. C. Rabiti, D. Mandelli, A. Alfonsi, J. Cogliati, and B. Kinoshita, “Mathematical framework for the analysis of dynamic stochastic systems with the RAVEN code,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Mathematics and Computational Methods Applied to Nuclear Science and Engineering (M & C '13), pp. 320–332, Sun Valley, Idaho, USA, May 2013. View at Scopus
  11. W. Gardiner, Handbook of Stochastic Methods: for Physics, Chemistry and the Natural Sciences, vol. 13 of Springer Series in Synergetics, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2002.
  12. J. C. Helton and F. J. Davis, “Latin hypercube sampling and the propagation of uncertainty in analyses of complex systems,” Reliability Engineering & System Safety, vol. 81, no. 1, pp. 23–69, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. H. S. Abdel-Khalik, Y. Bang, C. Kennedy, and J. Hite, “Reduced order modeling for nonlinear multi-component models,” International Journal for Uncertainty Quantification, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 341–361, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  14. U.S. NRC, WASH 1400—Reactor Safety Study—An Assessment of Accident Risks in U.S. Commercial Nuclear Power Plants, Division of Systems Research, Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC, USA, 1975.
  15. D. Mandelli, C. Smith, T. Riley et al., “Support and modeling for the boiling water reactor station black out case study using RELAP and RAVEN,” Idaho National Laboratory Report, Idaho National Laboratory, INL/EXT-13-30203, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  16. T. Beam, K. Ivanov, B. Taylor, and A. Baretta, Pressurized Water Reactor Main Steam Line Break (MSLB) Benchmark, Volume I: Final Specifications, NEA/NSC/DOC(99)8, US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, OECD Nuclear Energy Agency, 1999.
  17. N. Akinci, M. Ihmsen, G. Akinci, B. Solenthaler, and M. Teschner, “Versatile rigid-fluid coupling for incompressible SPH,” ACM Transactions on Graphics, vol. 31, no. 4, article 62, 2012, Proceedings of the ACM SIGGRAPH 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  18. S. A. Eide, C. D. Gentillon, T. E. Wierman, and D. M. Rasmuson, “Reevaluation of station blackout risk at nuclear power plants (NUREG/CR-6890),” in Analysis of Loss of Offsite Power Events: 1986–2004, vol. 1, US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  19. S. A. Eide, C. D. Gentillon, T. E. Wierman, and D. M. Rasmuson, “Reevaluation of station blackout risk at nuclear power plants (NUREG/CR-6890),” in Analysis of Station Blackout Risk, vol. 2, US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  20. C. Smith, S. Prescott, and T. Koonce, “Advanced small modular reactor (SMR) probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) demonstration,” Idaho National Laboratory Report INL/EXT-14-31876, Idaho National Laboratory, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  21. D. Gertman, H. Blackman, J. Marble, J. Byers, and C. Smith, The SPAR-H Human Reliability Analysis Method, NRC, 2005.
  22. J. J. Vandenkieboom, R. W. Youngbloob, J. C. Lee, and W. Kerr, “Reliability quantification of advanced reactor passive safety systems,” in Proceedings of the American Nuclear Society (ANS '97), vol. 76, p. 296, 1997.
  23. C. J. C. Burges, “A tutorial on support vector machines for pattern recognition,” Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 121–167, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. D. Mandelli and C. Smith, “Adaptive sampling using support vector machines,” in Proceedings of the American Nuclear Society (ANS '12), pp. 736–738, San Diego, Calif, USA, November 2012. View at Scopus