Research Article
AP1000 Shield Building Dynamic Response for Different Water Levels of PCCWST Subjected to Seismic Loading considering FSI
Table 4
The maximum transient data and the relative difference compared with Case I.
| Response | Displacement (cm) | Acceleration (m/s2) | von Mises stress (MPa) |
| Position | Point 1 | Point 1 | Point 2 | Point 3 | Case I | 2.563 (0%) | 13.410 (0%) | 6.507 (0%) | 8.563 (0%) | Case II | 2.469 (3.66%) | 12.580 (6.18%) | 6.270 (3.64%) | 8.265 (3.48%) | Case III | 2.391 (6.71%) | 11.599 (13.51%) | 5.554 (14.60%) | 7.330 (14.40%) | Case IV | 2.269 (11.47%) | 10.777 (19.63%) | 5.096 (21.68%) | 4.946 (42.24%) | Case V | 2.163 (15.61%) | 9.916 (26.05%) | 4.801 (26.21%) | 4.469 (47.81%) | Case VI | 2.060 (19.63%) | 9.194 (31.42%) | 4.399 (32.40%) | 4.001 (53.28%) |
|
|