Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations
Volume 2017, Article ID 1450648, 25 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/1450648
Research Article

Stand-Alone Containment Analysis of the Phébus FPT Tests with the ASTEC and the MELCOR Codes: The FPT-0 Test

Dipartimento di Ingegneria Civile e Industriale (DICI), University of Pisa, Largo Lucio Lazzarino 2, 56122 Pisa, Italy

Correspondence should be addressed to Bruno Gonfiotti; ti.ipinu.rof@ittoifnog.onurb

Received 13 May 2017; Accepted 21 August 2017; Published 5 December 2017

Academic Editor: Tomasz Kozlowski

Copyright © 2017 Bruno Gonfiotti and Sandro Paci. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. J.-P. Van Dorsselaere, A. Auvinen, D. Beraha et al., “Recent severe accident research synthesis of the major outcomes from the SARNET network,” Nuclear Engineering and Design, vol. 291, pp. 19–34, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. A. Bentaïb, H. Bonneville, G. Cénérino et al., Nuclear Power Reactor Core Melt Accidents, ESP Sciences, 2015.
  3. B. Clément and R. Zeyen, “The objectives of the Phébus FP experimental programme and main findings,” Annals of Nuclear Energy, vol. 61, pp. 4–10, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. O. De Luze, T. Haste, M. Barrachin, and G. Repetto, “Early phase fuel degradation in Phébus FP: Initiating phenomena of degradation in fuel bundle tests,” Annals of Nuclear Energy, vol. 61, pp. 23–35, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. T. Haste, F. Payot, and P. D. W. Bottomley, “Transport and deposition in the Phébus FP circuit,” Annals of Nuclear Energy, vol. 61, pp. 102–121, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. M. Laurie, P. March, B. Simondi-Teisseire, and F. Payot, “Containment behaviour in Phébus FP,” Annals of Nuclear Energy, vol. 60, pp. 15–27, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. P. March and B. Simondi-Teisseire, “Overview of the facility and experiments performed in Phébus FP,” Annals of Nuclear Energy, vol. 61, pp. 11–22, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. G. Brillant, C. Marchetto, and W. Plumecocq, “Fission product release from nuclear fuel II. Validation of ASTEC/ELSA on analytical and large scale experiments,” Annals of Nuclear Energy, vol. 61, pp. 96–101, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. N. Hanniet-Girault and G. Repetto, FPT-0 Final Report, Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire, Saint-Paul-Les-Durance, France.
  10. G. Gyenes and L. Ammirabile, “Containment analysis on the PHEBUS FPT-0, FPT-1 and FPT-2 experiments,” Nuclear Engineering and Design, vol. 241, no. 3, pp. 854–864, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. K. Mueller, S. Dickinson, C. de Pascale et al., “Validation of severe accident codes on the phebus fission product tests in the framework of the PHEBEN-2 project,” Nuclear Technology, vol. 163, no. 2, pp. 209–227, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. V. D. Layly, P. Spitz, S. Tirini, and A. Mailliat, “Analysis of the phebus FPT0 containment thermal hydraulics with the Jericho and Trio-VF codes,” Nuclear Engineering and Design, vol. 166, no. 3, pp. 413–426, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. F. d. Rosa and R. Mari, “Thermal-hydraulics and physics near Phebus condenser, a comparison between codes and against some experimental data from FPT0 test,” in Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Nuclear Engineering (ICONE), Tokyo, Japan, 1999.
  14. A. Bujan, G. Gyenes, and H. Wider, Final Interpretation Report on the FPT0 and FPT1 Circuit and Containment Analyses, 2007.
  15. M. Di Giuli, T. Haste, R. Biehler et al., “SARNET benchmark on Phébus FPT3 integral experiment on core degradation and fission product behaviour,” Annals of Nuclear Energy, vol. 93, pp. 65–82, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. B. Gonfiotti and S. Paci, “Stand-alone containment analysis of the Phébus FPT-1 test with the ASTEC and the MELCOR codes,” in Proceedings of the 2016 24th International Conference on Nuclear Engineering, ICONE 2016, Charlotte, NC, USA, June 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. A. Kontautas and E. Urbonavičius, “Analysis of aerosol deposition in PHEBUS containment during FPT-1 experiment,” Nuclear Engineering and Design, vol. 239, no. 7, pp. 1267–1274, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. W. Klein-Hessling and B. Schwinges, ASTEC V0 CPA Module Program Reference Manual, nstitut de Protection et de Surete Nucleaire (IPSN)/Gesellschaft fur Anlagen-und Reacktorsicherheit (GRS) mbH, 1998.
  19. L. Bosland, ASTEC V2.0 rev2 Code IODE Module: Iodine And Ruthenium Behaviour in The Containment, Institut de Protection et de Surete Nucleaire (IPSN)/Gesellschaft fur Anlagen-und Reacktorsicherheit (GRS) mbH, Saint Paul-lez-Durance, France, 2011.
  20. G. Guillard, F. Jacq, C. Seropian, and W. Plumecocq, ASTEC V1 Code SYSINT Module Management of Events and Safety Systems Interactions, Institut de Protection et de Surete Nucleaire (IPSN)/Gesellschaft fur Anlagen-und Reacktorsicherheit (GRS) mbH, Saint Paul-lex-Durance, France, 2007.
  21. L. L. Humphries, R. K. Cole, D. L. Louie, V. G. Figueroa, and M. F. Young, MELCOR Computer Code Manuals Vol.1: Primer and User's Guide, Sandia National Laboratory, 2015.
  22. J. L. Tills, A. Notafrancesco, and J. Phillips, Application of the MELCOR Code to Design Basis PWR Large Dry Containment Analysis, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, USA, 2009.
  23. D. S. Yoon, H. Jo, and M. L. Corradini, “Assessment of MELCOR condensation models with the presence of noncondensable gas in natural convection flow regime,” Nuclear Engineering and Design, vol. 317, pp. 110–117, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. B. Gonfiotti and S. Paci, “A stand-alone containment analysis of the Phébus FPT-0 test with the ASTEC and the MELCOR codes,” in Proceedings of the 8th conference on Severe Accident Research, ERMSAR 2017, Warsaw, Poland, 2017.
  25. A. V. Jones, S. Dickinson, C. De Pascale et al., “Validation of severe accident codes against Phebus FP for plant applications: Status of the PHEBEN2 project,” Nuclear Engineering and Design, vol. 221, no. 1-3, pp. 225–240, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. B. Clément, L. Cantrel, G. Ducros et al., “State of the Art Report on Iodine Chemistry,” Tech. Rep., 2007. View at Google Scholar
  27. L. Soffer, S. Burson, C. Ferrell, R. Lee, and J. Ridgely, “Accident Source Terms for Light-Water Nuclear Power Plants,” Tech. Rep., U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commision, Washington, WA, USA, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  28. W. C. Hinds, Aerosol Technology, Wiley-Interscience Publication, 2012.
  29. E. Hontanon, J. Polo, and L. E. Herranz, “On the modelling capabilities to simulate aerosol behaviour in the PHEBUS-FP containment: Lessons learned from FPT0 test,” Journal of Aerosol Science, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. S459–S460, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. P. Dumaz and S. Cho, “Thermophoretic deposition in the first Phebus-FP experiment,” Journal of Aerosol Science, vol. 26, pp. 83-84, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  31. A. Kontautas, E. Babilas, and E. Urbonavičius, “COCOSYS analysis for deposition of aerosols and fission products in PHEBUS FPT-2 containment,” Nuclear Engineering and Design, vol. 247, pp. 160–167, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus