Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations
Volume 2017 (2017), Article ID 1953256, 17 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/1953256
Research Article

Feasibility Studies on Pyro-SFR Closed Fuel Cycle and Direct Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel in Line with the Latest National Policy and Strategy of Korea

Kyung Hee University, 1732 Deogyeong-daero, Giheung-gu, Yongin-si, Gyeonggi-do 17104, Republic of Korea

Correspondence should be addressed to Jae Hak Cheong; rk.ca.uhk@gnoehchj

Received 20 June 2017; Revised 22 August 2017; Accepted 17 September 2017; Published 31 October 2017

Academic Editor: Arkady Serikov

Copyright © 2017 Muhammad Minhaj Khan et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. Korea Institute of Nuclear Safety (KINS), Review Report on the Quarterly Reports form Nuclear Business Operators Regarding Radiation Safety for the First Quarter of 2016, KINS, 2016.
  2. Ministry of Trade and Industry and Energy (MOTIE), “The 7th Basic Plan on Electricity Demand and Supply,” Notice No. 2015-403, MOTIE, 2015.
  3. Ministry of Trade and Industry and Energy (MOTIE), “Basic Plan for High Level Radioactive Waste Management,” MOTIE, 2016.
  4. Ministry of Science and ICT and Future Planning (MSIP), Strategy for Technical Development and Demonstration of Future Nuclear Energy System, MSIP, 2016.
  5. The government of the Republic of Korea and C. Pinel, “Korean Fifth National Report under the Joint Convention on the Safety of Spent Fuel Management and on the Safety of Radioactive Waste Management,” 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. J. Kang, “Alternatives for additional spent fuel storage in South Korea,” Science & Global Security, vol. 10, no. 3, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  7. J. Park, “Status of the korean high-level radioactive waste management program,” in in proceedings of ANS Conference International High-level Radioactive Waste Management (IHLRWM 2017), Charlotte, NC, USA, April 9-13, 2017.
  8. Y. I. Kim, S. G. Hong, and D. Hahn, “SFR deployment strategy for the re-use of spent fuel in Korea,” Nuclear Engineering and Technology, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 517–526, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. J. Kang, “The ROK’s nuclear energy development and spent fuel management plans,” NAPSNet Special Reports, June 17, 2014, https://nautilus.org/napsnet/napsnet-special-reports/the-roks-nuclear-energy-development-and-spent-fuel-management-plans/. View at Google Scholar
  10. C. Braun and R. Forrest, “Considerations regarding ROK spent nuclear fuel management options,” Nuclear Engineering and Technology, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 427–438, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. B. H. Park, F. Gao, E.-H. Kwon, and W. I. Ko, “Comparative study of different nuclear fuel cycle options: Quantitative analysis on material flow,” Energy Policy, vol. 39, no. 11, pp. 6916–6924, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. S. K. Kim, W. I. Ko, S. R. Youn, and R. X. Gao, “Nuclear fuel cycle cost estimation and sensitivity analysis of unit costs on the basis of an equilibrium model,” Nuclear Engineering and Technology, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 306–314, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. F. Gao and W. I. Ko, “Dynamic analysis of a pyroprocessing coupled SFR fuel recycling,” Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations, vol. 2012, Article ID 390758, pp. 1–10, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. W. I. Ko and F. Gao, “Economic analysis of different nuclear fuel cycle options,” Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations, vol. 2012, Article ID 293467, pp. 1–10, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. S. K. Kim, W. I. Ko, and Y. H. Lee, “Economic viability of metallic sodium-cooled fast reactor fuel in Korea,” Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations, vol. 2013, Article ID 412349, pp. 1–10, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. S. K. Kim, W. I. Ko, and Y. H. Lee, “Economic assessment of alternative Pyro-SFR nuclear fuel cycle in Korea,” Progress in Nuclear Energy, vol. 66, pp. 124–132, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. R. Gao, S. Choi, W. Il Ko, and S. Kim, “Economic potential of fuel recycling options: A lifecycle cost analysis of future nuclear system transition in China,” Energy Policy, vol. 101, pp. 526–536, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. S. Choi, H. J. Lee, and W. I. Ko, “Dynamic analysis of once-through and closed fuel cycle economics using Monte Carlo simulation,” Nuclear Engineering and Design, vol. 277, pp. 234–247, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. Ministry of Knowledge Economy (MKE), Cost estimation of interim storage for spent fuels, Ministry of Knowledge Economy of Republic of Korea, Seoul, Korea, 2012.
  20. Ministry of Knowledge Economy (MKE), Ministry of Knowledge Economy Cost Estimation of Final Disposal for Spent Fuels, Ministry of Knowledge Economy of Republic of Korea, Seoul, Korea, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  21. C. S. Rim, “Korean nuclear fuel program,” Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology, vol. 35, no. 7, pp. 467–472, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. F. Fiori and Z. Zhou, “Sustainability of the Chinese nuclear expansion: The role of ADS to close the nuclear fuel cycle,” Progress in Nuclear Energy, vol. 83, pp. 123–134, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. P. Villalibre, E. Haas, H. Khartabil, S. Kim, A. Korinny, V. Usanov et al., “Technical Progress in INPRO activities on Modelling and Innovation,” in INPRO Group Department of Nuclear Energy, International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Vienna, Austria.
  24. F. Fiori and Z. Zhou, “Sustainability of the Chinese nuclear expansion: Natural uranium resources availability, Pu cycle, fuel utilization efficiency and spent fuel management,” Annals of Nuclear Energy, vol. 83, pp. 246–257, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. IAEA, “Nuclear Fuel Cycle Simulation System (VISTA),” in IAEA TECDOC-1535, Vienna, Austria, February 2007. View at Google Scholar
  26. IAEA, Nuclear Fuel Cycle Simulation System (NFCSS) user manual, IAEA, Vienna, Austria, December 2011.
  27. Nuclear Power in South Korea, “World Nuclear Association,” last updated February 2017, http://www.world-nuclear.org/information-library/country-profiles/countries-o-s/south-korea.aspx. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  28. Y. Arafat et al., “Radiotoxicity characterization of hlw from reprocessing of Uranium-based and Thorium- based fuel,” in WM2011 Conference, Phoenix, Arizona, February 27 - March 3, 2011.
  29. The Korean Academy of Science and Technology, “Management of high level nuclear wastes,” Research Reports Series No. 54, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  30. International Commission on Radiological Protection, “Compendium of dose coefficients based on ICRP publication 60, ICRP publication no. 119,” Annals of ICRP, vol. 41, no. S1, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  31. C. Jeong and H. Choi, “Dynamic modeling and analysis of alternative fuel cycle scenarios in Korea,” Nuclear Engineering and Technology, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 85–94, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  32. Y. K. Lee and M. H. Kim, “Recycling option search for a 600-MWe sodium-cooled transmutation fast reactor,” Nuclear Engineering and Technology, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 47–58, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. S. G. Hong, S. J. Kim, Y. I. Kim, and D. Hahn, “600 MWe Sodium cooled fast reactor core designs for efficient TRU transmutation,” in in Proceedings of the The Korean Nuclear Society Spring Meeting, pp. 26-27, Republic of Korea, May 2006.
  34. Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute (KAERI), “Development of Sodium Cooled Fast Reactor Core Concept for Maximizing TRU Burning Rate,” KAERI/CN-2209/2015, Daejeon, Korea, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  35. G. De Roo and J. E. Parsons, “A methodology for calculating the levelized cost of electricity in nuclear power systems with fuel recycling,” Energy Economics, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 826–839, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. M. Bunn, B. van der, J. P. Zwaan, and S. Fetter, “The economics of reprocessing vs. direct disposal of spent nuclear fuel,” Tech. Rep. DE-FG-26-99FT4028, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  37. OECD/NEA, “Advance nuclear fuel cycle and radioactive waste management,” Tech. Rep. 5990.OECD, Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA), Paris, France, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  38. Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), “Production and Measurement of Minor Actinides in the Commercial Fuel Cycle,” Tech. Rep., 1997, LA-13248-MS/UC-700/1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  39. WISE Uranium Project, “Uranium toxicity,” 2017, http://www.wise-uranium.org/utox.html. View at Google Scholar
  40. OECD/NEA, The economics of the back end of the nuclear fuel cycle, OECD, Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA), Vienna, Austria, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  41. Smith School of Enterprise and the Environment (SSEE), A low carbon nuclear future: Economic assessment of nuclear materials and spent nuclear fuel management in the UK, Oxford, United Kingdom, March 2011.
  42. D. Shropshire, K. A. Williams, W. B. Boore et al., “Advanced fuel cycle cost basis,” Tech. Rep. INL/EXT-07-12107, Idaho National Laboratory (INL), 2007. View at Google Scholar
  43. D. Shropshire, E. A. Hoffman, J. D. Smith et al., “Advanced Fuel Cycle Economic Analysis of Symbiotic Light-Water Reactor and Fast Burner Reactor Systems,” Idaho National Laboratory (INL), no. INL/EXT-09-15254, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  44. G. Francesco and B. Dixon, “Nuclear energy system cost modeling actinide and fission product partitioning and transmutation,” in Proceedings of the 12th Information Exchange Meeting on Actinide and Fission Product Partitioning and Transmutation, Idaho National Laboratory (INL), September 2012.
  45. G. E. Evans and B. Jones, “The application of Monte Carlo simulation in finance, economics and operations management,” in Proceedings of the 2009 WRI World Congress on Computer Science and Information Engineering, CSIE 2009, pp. 379–383, usa, April 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. E. Parent, Nuclear fuel cycles for mid-century deployment, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, September 2003.