Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations
Volume 2017 (2017), Article ID 2960412, 15 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/2960412
Research Article

Multiscale Thermal Hydraulic Study under the Inadvertent Safety Injection System Operation Scenario of Typical Pressurized Water Reactor

Department of Nuclear Science and Technology, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, China

Correspondence should be addressed to Suizheng Qiu

Received 16 July 2017; Accepted 10 September 2017; Published 18 October 2017

Academic Editor: Iztok Tiselj

Copyright © 2017 Mingjun Wang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. B. R. Bass, C. E. Pugh, J. Sievers, and H. Schulz, “Overview of the international comparative assessment study of pressurized thermal-shock in reactor pressure vessels (RPV PTS ICAS),” International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, vol. 78, no. 2-3, article 2132, pp. 197–211, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. D. Lucas, D. Bestion, E. Bodèle et al., “An overview of the pressurized thermal shock issue in the context of the NURESIM project,” Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations, vol. 2009, Article ID 583259, 13 pages, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. V. Petrov and A. Manera, “Validation of star-ccm+ for bouyancy driven mixing in a pwr reactor pressure vessel,” in Proceedings of the NURETH-14, Ontario, Canada, September 2011.
  4. V. Petrov and A. Manera, “Effect of pump-induced cold-leg swirls on the flow field in the RPV of the EPR™: CFD investigations and comparison with experimental results,” Nuclear Engineering and Design, vol. 241, no. 5, pp. 1478–1485, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. P. Coste, J. Pouvreau, J. Laviéville, and M. Boucker, “A two-phase CFD approach to the pts problem evaluated on cosi experiment,” in Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Nuclear Engineering (ICONE16 '08), pp. 573–581, Orlando, Fla, USA, May 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. N. Mérigoux, J. Laviéville, S. Mimouni, M. Guingo, C. Baudry, and S. Bellet, “Verification, validation and application of NEPTUNE_CFD to two-phase Pressurized Thermal Shocks,” Nuclear Engineering and Design, vol. 312, pp. 74–85, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. P. Coste, J. Laviéville, J. Pouvreau, C. Baudry, M. Guingo, and A. Douce, “Validation of the large interface method of NEPTUNE CFD 1.0.8 for pressurized thermal shock (PTS) applications,” Nuclear Engineering and Design, vol. 253, pp. 296–310, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. P. Coste, J. Pouvreau, C. Morel et al., “Modeling turbulence and friction around a large interface in a three-dimension two-velocity Eulerian code,” in Proceedings of the 12th International Meeting on Nuclear Reactor Thermal Hydraulics (NURETH-12), Pittsburgh, Pa, USA, September 2007.
  9. K. Onizawa, K. Shibata, K. Osakabe, and K. Tanaka, “Improvements to PFM analysis code PASCAL and some case studies on RPV integrity during pressurized thermal shock,” in Proceedings of the ASME 2006 Pressure Vessels and Piping/ICPVT-11 Conference, Vancouver, Canada, July 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. C. Jang, “Treatment of the thermal-hydraulic uncertainties in the pressurized thermal shock analysis,” Nuclear Engineering and Design, vol. 237, no. 2, pp. 143–152, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. R. Woods, N. Siu, A. Kolaczkowski, and W. Galyean, “Selection of pressurized thermal shock (PTS) transient to include in PTS risk analyses,” International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, vol. 78, no. 2-3, pp. 179–183, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. RELAP5/MOD3.3, 2001, RELAP5/MOD3.3, 2001, Code Manual Volume 1: Code Structure, System Models, and Solution Methods NUREG/CR-5535.
  13. RELAP5/MOD3.3, 2001, RELAP5/MOD3.3, 2001, Code Manual Volume V: User’s Guidelines NUREG/CR-5535.
  14. ANSYS, ANSYS CFX-Solver Theory Guide, ANSYS Inc., Canonsburg, Pa, USA, 2006.
  15. M. Wang, S. Qiu, W. Tian, G. Su, and Y. Zhang, “The comparison of designed water-cooled and air-cooled passive residual heat removal system for 300 MW nuclear power plant during the feed-water line break scenario,” Annals of Nuclear Energy, vol. 57, pp. 164–172, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. NEA, “Best Practice Guidelines for the use of CFD in nuclear reactor safety applications,” Tech. Rep., NEA, Singapore, 2007. View at Google Scholar