Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations
Volume 2017 (2017), Article ID 5403701, 13 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/5403701
Research Article

Research on the Computed Tomography Pebble Flow Detecting System for HTR-PM

1Institute of Nuclear and New Energy Technology, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
2Key Laboratory of Nuclear Detection and Measurement Technology, Beijing 100084, China

Correspondence should be addressed to Zhifang Wu

Received 26 December 2016; Revised 21 March 2017; Accepted 4 April 2017; Published 24 April 2017

Academic Editor: Robert Morris

Copyright © 2017 Xin Wan et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. A. C. Kadak and M. Z. Bazant, “Pebble flow experiments for pebble bed reactors,” in Proceeding of the 2th International Topical Meeting on High Temperature Reactor Technology, p. 22, Beijing, China, 2004.
  2. V. D. Decken and G. Lange, Pebble Bed Mechanics: AVR-Experimental High Temperature Reactor, vol. 154, Association of German Engineers VDI-Society for Energy Technologies, Düsseldorf, Germany, 1990.
  3. S. Y. Jiang, X. T. Yang, Z. W. Tang et al., “Experimental and numerical validation of a two-region-designed pebble bed reactor with dynamic core,” Nuclear Engineering and Design, vol. 246, pp. 277–285, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. X. Z. Zhang, X. T. Yang, Y. J. Zhang et al., “Experiments of two-region pebble dynamics of two-dimension core in HTR,” Nuclear Power Engineering, vol. 31, Supplement 1, p. 57, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  5. F. C. Gatt, Flow of spheres and near spheres in cylindrical vessels, part IV., Australian Energy Commission, Lucas Heights, New South Wales, Australia, 1973.
  6. A. H. Shehata, A new method for radioactive particle tracking [Phd dissertation], Graduate Faculty of North Carolina State University, 2005.
  7. V. Khane, I. A. Said, and M. H. Al-Dahhan, “Experimental investigation of pebble flow dynamics using radioactive particle tracking technique in a scaled-down Pebble Bed Modular Reactor (PBMR),” Nuclear Engineering and Design, vol. 302, pp. 1–11, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. M. Laufer and G. Buster, “X-ray pebble recirculation experiment (X-PREX) design and initial experimental results,” Report UCBTH-15-002, Department of Nuclear Engineering, UC Berkeley, Berkeley, Calif, USA, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  9. Y. Zheng, L. Shi, and Y. Wang, “Water-ingress analysis for the 200–MWe pebble-bed modular high temperature gas-cooled reactor,” Nuclear Engineering and Design, vol. 240, no. 10, pp. 3095–3107, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. X. Wan, J. C. Miao, X. M. Liu et al., “Research on reconstruction method for pebble-detecting CT system,” in Proceedings of the 8th International Topical Meeting on High Temperature Reactor Technology, Las Vegas, Nev, USA, 2016.
  11. G. Wang and M. W. Vannier, “Optimal pitch in spiral computed tomography,” Medical Physics, vol. 24, no. 10, pp. 1635–1639, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. S. U. Lee, S. Y. Chung, and R. H. Park, “A comparative performance study of several global thresholding techniques for segmentation,” Computer Vision, Graphics and Image Processing, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 171–190, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. N. Otsu, “A threshold selection method from gray-level histograms,” Automatica, vol. 11, no. 23–27, pp. 23–27, 1975. View at Google Scholar