Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations
Volume 2017 (2017), Article ID 6140323, 11 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/6140323
Research Article

RELAP5 Simulation of PKL Facility Experiments under Midloop Conditions

Department of Chemical and Nuclear Engineering, Universitat Politècnica de València, Valencia, Spain

Correspondence should be addressed to J. F. Villanueva

Received 4 August 2016; Revised 22 November 2016; Accepted 12 December 2016; Published 9 February 2017

Academic Editor: Francesc Reventos

Copyright © 2017 J. F. Villanueva et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. K. W. Seul, Y. S. Bang, and H. J. Kim, “Mitigation measures following a loss-of-residual-heat-removal event during shutdown,” Nuclear Technology, vol. 132, no. 1, pp. 152–165, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. NUREG-1269, Loss of Residual Heat Removal System, Diablo Canyon Unit 2, April 10, 1987, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 1997.
  3. NUREG-1410, Loss of Vital AC Power and the Residual Heat Removal System during Mid-Loop Operations at Vogtle Unit 1 on March 20, 1990, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 1990.
  4. NUREG-5535, RELAP5/MOD3.3 Code Manual. Volume II: User's Guide and Input Requirements, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 2001.
  5. K. Umminger, R. Mandl, and R. Wegner, “Restart of natural circulation in a PWR-PKL test results and S-RELAP5 calculations,” Nuclear Engineering and Design, vol. 215, no. 1-2, pp. 39–50, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. S. Carlos, J. F. Villanueva, S. Martorell, and V. Serradell, “Analysis of a loss of residual heat removal system during mid-loop conditions at PKL facility using RELAP5/Mod3.3,” Nuclear Engineering and Design, vol. 238, no. 10, pp. 2561–2567, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. J. F. Villanueva, S. Carlos, S. Martorell, and F. Sánchez, “Effect of steam generator configuration in a loss of the RHR during mid-loop operation at PKL facility,” in Proceedings of the Conference on Advances in Reactor Physics (PHYSOR '12), Knoxville, Tenn, USA, April 2012.
  8. K. Umminger, L. Dennhardt, S. Schollenberger, and B. Schoen, “Integral test facility PKL: experimental PWR accident investigation,” Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations, vol. 2012, Article ID 891056, 16 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. E. Coscarelli, A. Del Nevo, and F. D'Auria, “Qualification of TRACE V5.0 code against fast cooldown transient in the PKL-III integral test facility,” Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations, vol. 2013, Article ID 128305, 11 pages, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. A. Bousbia Salah and J. Vlassenbroeck, “CATHARE assessment of natural circulation in the PKL test facility during asymmetric cooldown transients,” Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations, vol. 2012, Article ID 950389, 10 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. S. Carlos, A. Querol, S. Gallardo et al., “Post-test analysis of the ROSA/LSTF and PKL counterpart test,” Nuclear Engineering and Design, vol. 297, pp. 81–94, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. Framatome ANP, “PKL III: RELAP5/Mod3 Input-Model,” NGES1/2002/en/0059, 2002.