Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations
Volume 2017, Article ID 9404636, 12 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/9404636
Research Article

HTR-10GT Dual Bypass Valve Control Features and Decoupling Strategy for Power Regulation

Institute of Nuclear and New Energy Technology of Tsinghua University, Collaborative Innovation Center of Advanced Nuclear Energy Technology, The Key Laboratory of Advanced Reactor Engineering and Safety, Ministry of Education, Beijing 100084, China

Correspondence should be addressed to Youjie Zhang; nc.ude.auhgnist@jygnahz

Received 9 October 2016; Accepted 10 January 2017; Published 13 February 2017

Academic Editor: Eugenijus Ušpuras

Copyright © 2017 Xiao Li et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. Z. Zuoyi and L. Yong, “Prospects of power conversion technology of direct cycle helium gas turbine for MHTGR,” Nuclear Power Engineering, vol. 20, pp. 159–164, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  2. C. Wang, Design, Analysis and Optimization of the Power Conversion System for the Modular Pebble Bed Reactor System, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2003.
  3. A. Shenoy and R. Potter, “Gas Turbine-Modular Helium Reactor (GT-MHR) conceptual design description report,” GA Report 910720, 1996. View at Google Scholar
  4. H. Sato, X. L. Yan, Y. Tachibana, and Y. Kato, “Load-following operations of VHTR gas-turbine cogeneration system for developing countries,” International Journal of Gas Turbine, Propulsion and Power Systems, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 17–24, 2012. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. X. Yan, Dynamic Analysis and Control System Design for an Advanced Nuclear Gas Turbine Power Plant, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1990.
  6. J. F. Kikstra and A. H. M. Verkooijen, “Dynamic modeling of a cogenerating nuclear gas turbine plant—part II: dynamic behavior and control,” Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, vol. 124, no. 3, pp. 734–743, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. P. D. Kemp and C. Nieuwoudt, Operation and Control of the PBMR Demonstration Power Plant, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2006.
  8. Z. Huang, J. Wang, and J. Li, “Study on the thermodynamic cycle of HTR-10GT,” in Proceedings of the 2nd International Topical Meeting on High Temperature Reactor Technology, Beijing, China, September 2004.
  9. R. Sa, Study on Dynamic Features of Bypass Valve Control for HTGR Brayton Cycle, Tsinghua University, 2007.
  10. A. S. Boksenbom and R. Hood, “General algebraic method applied to control analysis of complex engine types,” 1950.
  11. P. Fritzson, P. Aronsson, A. Pop et al., “OpenModelica—a free open-source environment for system modeling, simulation, and teaching,” in Proceedings of the Joint IEEE Conference on Control Applications (CCA), Computer-Aided Control Systems Design Symposium (CACSD) and International Symposium on Intelligent Control (ISIC '06), pp. 1588–1595, October 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. K. E. Brenan, S. L. Campbell, and L. R. Petzold, Numerical Solution of Initial-Value Problems in Differential-Algebraic Equations, SIAM, 1996. View at MathSciNet
  13. A. B. Wassell, “Reynolds number effects in axial compressors,” Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, vol. 90, no. 2, pp. 149–156, 1968. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. A. Leyzerovich, Large Power Steam Turbines: Design and Operation, Pennwell Publishing, Tulsa, Okla, USA, 1997.
  15. E. H. Bristol, “On a new measure of interaction for multivariable process control,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 133–134, 1966. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. D. Bates and I. Postlethwaite, Robust Multivariable Control of Aerospace Systems, IOS Press, 2002.