Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations
Volume 2018, Article ID 8680406, 15 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/8680406
Research Article

Strategy Evaluation for Cavity Flooding during an ESBO Initiated Severe Accident

1Fundamental Science on Nuclear Safety and Simulation Technology Laboratory, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin 150001, China
2China Nuclear Power Operation Technology Corporation LTD, Wuhan 430000, China

Correspondence should be addressed to Tenglong Cong; nc.ude.uebrh@gnoclt

Received 4 September 2017; Revised 19 November 2017; Accepted 1 January 2018; Published 1 February 2018

Academic Editor: Manmohan Pandey

Copyright © 2018 Nan Jiang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. M. Holt, R. J. Campbell, and M. B. Nikitin, Fukushima nuclear disaster, Congressional Research Service, 2012.
  2. EPRI, “Candidate high-level actions and their effects,” in Severe Accident Management Guidance Technical Basis Report, 2012, p. 1025295. View at Google Scholar
  3. K. Zhang, X. W. Cao, J. Deng et al., “Evaluation of intentional depressurization strategy in Chinese 600 MWe PWR NPP,” Nuclear Engineering and Design, vol. 238, no. 7, pp. 1720–1727, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. J. W. Park and W.-C. Seol, “Considerations for severe accident management under extended station blackout conditions in nuclear power plants,” Progress in Nuclear Energy, vol. 88, no. 4, pp. 245–256, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. J. Wang, Y. Zhang, K. Mao et al., “MELCOR simulation of core thermal response during a station blackout initiated severe accident in China pressurized reactor (CPR1000),” Progress in Nuclear Energy, vol. 81, pp. 6–15, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. M. Steinbrück, M. Große, L. Sepold, and J. Stuckert, “Synopsis and outcome of the QUENCH experimental program,” Nuclear Engineering and Design, vol. 240, no. 7, pp. 1714–1727, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. D. W. Akers, S. M. Jensen, and B. K. Schuetz, “Examination of relocated fuel debris adjacent to the lower head of the TMI-2 reactor vessel,” NUREG/CR--6195; EGG--2732, Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC, USA, 1994. View at Google Scholar
  8. T. G. Theofanous, C. Liu, S. Angelini, H. Tuomisto, S. Additon, and O. Kymäläinen, “Experience from the first two integrated approaches to in-vessel retention through external cooling,” NEA-CSNI-R--94-11, 1994. View at Google Scholar
  9. H. Esmaili and M. Khatib-Rahbar, Analysis of in-vessel retention and ex-vessel fuel coolant interaction for AP1000, Energy Research, Inc., ERI/NRC, 2004.
  10. H. Esmaili and M. Khatib-Rahbar, “Analysis of likelihood of lower head failure and ex-vessel fuel coolant interaction energetics for AP1000,” Nuclear Engineering and Design, vol. 235, no. 15, pp. 1583–1605, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. Y. P. Zhang, S. Z. Qiu, G. H. Su, and W. X. Tian, “Analysis of safety margin of in-vessel retention for AP1000,” Nuclear Engineering and Design, vol. 240, no. 8, pp. 2023–2033, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. L.-J. Wu, D.-Q. Guo, and X.-W. Cao, “External reactor vessel cooling measure in severe accident for pressurized water reactor nuclear power plant,” Atomic Energy Science and Technology, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 46–50, 2009. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. J.-T. Yuan, L.-L. Tong, X.-W. Cao, and L.-J. Wu, “Analysis on external reactor vessel cooling measure in severe accident induced by lofw for pressurized water reactor nuclear power plant,” Atomic Energy Science and Technology, vol. 42, pp. 132–136, 2008. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. D. Zhu, Q. Xiang, M. Zhang et al., “Evaluation of in-vessel corium retention margin for small modular reactor ACP100,” Annals of Nuclear Energy, vol. 94, pp. 684–690, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. M. Jahn and H. H. Reineke, “Free convection heat transfer with internal heat sources, calculations and measurements,” in Proceedings of the In Proc. 5th Int, vol. 13, pp. 74–78, 1974.
  16. W. A. Stewart, A. T. Pieczynski, and V. Srinivas, “Natural Circulation Experiments for PWR High Pressure Accidents,” Tech. Rep., Westinghouse Electric Corp, 1992. View at Google Scholar
  17. J. H. Scobel, L. E. Conway, and T. G. Theofanous, In-vessel retention of molten core debris in the Westinghouse AP1000 advanced passive PWR, American Nuclear Society, La Grange Park, IL, USA, 2002.
  18. T. G. Theofanous, C. Liu, S. Additon, S. Angelini, O. Kymäläinen, and T. Salmassi, “In-vessel coolability and retention of a core melt,” Nuclear Engineering and Design, vol. 169, no. 1-3, pp. 1–48, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus