Research Article

Experimental Investigation of Decontamination Factor Dependence on Aerosol Concentration in Pool Scrubbing

Table 1

Experimental conditions and aerosol related descriptions of all the experiments.

ExperimentDispersing flow rate (m3/s)Discharging flow rate (m3/s)Injection flow rate (m3/s)Atmospheric pressure (kPa)Hydrostatic pressure at nozzle exit (kPa)Air and water temperatures (K)Injection flow rate at nozzle exit (m3/s)Submergence (m)Instruments for DFOther instrumentsMode diameter (μm)

PW16 × 10−41.2 × 10−31.7 × 10−310221282 ± 3 1.3 × 10−32.4WELAS sensorsDilution (Inlet) 0.5
PW26 × 10−41.1 × 10−31.6 × 10−310115283 ± 31.6WELAS sensorsDilution (Inlet)
PW35 × 10−41.1 × 10−31.5 × 10−31027287 ± 40.8WELAS sensorsDilution (Inlet)
PW45 × 10−41.0 × 10−31.4 × 10−31012281 ± 40.3WELAS sensorsDilution (Inlet)
PF17 × 10−41.4 × 10−31.7 × 10−310121283 ± 32.4FiltersWELAS sensor (Outlet)
PF27 × 10−41.4 × 10−31.7 × 10−310121284 ± 42.4FiltersWELAS sensor (Outlet)
EW15 × 10−41.0 × 10−31.3 × 10−31000293 ± 20WELAS sensorsNone

(a)In the condition of 293 K and 101 kPa.
(b)A sum of dispersion and discharging flow rates minus inlet sampling flow rate.
(c)In the condition of actual gas temperature and pressure at injection nozzle exit.
(d)Measured by WELAS.