Research Article
A Methodology for Optimizing the Management of Spent Fuel of Nuclear Power Plants Using Dry Storage Casks
Table 6
Sensitivity analysis for the optimization algorithm using the adapted source.
| Dose Rate Limit 0.2 mSv/h | Concrete cost per m3 (M.U.) | 100 | 1000 | 5000 | Optimal Time (months) | Concrete Thickness (mm) | Optimal Time (months) | Concrete Thickness (mm) | Optimal Time (months) | Concrete Thickness (mm) |
| Pool cost per stored Fuel Assembly (M.U.) | 0.5 | 433 | 300.000 | 720 | 299.709 | 720 | 299.709 | 1 | 433 | 300.000 | 601 | 299.788 | 720 | 299.709 | 25 | 121 | 343.877 | 433 | 300.000 | 433 | 300.000 | 50 | 61 | 360.956 | 433 | 300.000 | 433 | 300.000 | 75 | 61 | 360.955 | 433 | 300.000 | 433 | 300.000 | 100 | 13 | 389.405 | 433 | 300.000 | 433 | 300.000 | 500 | 13 | 389.405 | 61 | 360.956 | 433 | 300.000 | 1000 | 13 | 389.405 | 13 | 389.405 | 121 | 343.877 |
| Dose Rate Limit 4 mSv/h | Concrete cost per m3 (M.U.) | 100 | 1000 | 5000 | Optimal Time (months) | Concrete Thickness (mm) | Optimal Time (months) | Concrete Thickness (mm) | Optimal Time (months) | Concrete Thickness (mm) |
| Pool cost per stored Fuel Assembly (M.U.) | 1 | 720 | 288.610 | 720 | 288.610 | 720 | 288.610 | 10 | 13 | 299.670 | 720 | 288.610 | 720 | 288.610 | 50 | 13 | 299.670 | 13 | 299.670 | 720 | 288.610 | 75 | 13 | 299.670 | 13 | 299.670 | 613 | 290.050 | 90 | 13 | 299.670 | 13 | 299.670 | 121 | 297.002 | 100 | 13 | 299.670 | 13 | 299.670 | 61 | 298.003 | 250 | 13 | 299.670 | 13 | 299.670 | 13 | 299.670 | 200 | 13 | 299.670 | 13 | 299.670 | 13 | 299.670 |
|
|