Xe Ion Irradiation-Induced Microstructural Evolution and Hardening Effect of Nickel-Base Superalloy

Hou, Yu; Li, DeHui; Lu, YanLing; Huang, HeFei; Yang, WeiGuo; Liu, RenDuo

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5535478

Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations

On this page

Abstract Introduction Experimental Results and Discussion Conclusion Data Availability Conflicts of Interest Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2021 | Article ID 5535478 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5535478

Xe Ion Irradiation-Induced Microstructural Evolution and Hardening Effect of Nickel-Base Superalloy

Yu Hou,^1,2DeHui Li ,¹YanLing Lu,¹HeFei Huang,¹WeiGuo Yang,²and RenDuo Liu¹

Academic Editor: Arkady Serikov

Received31 Jan 2021

Revised08 Oct 2021

Accepted09 Oct 2021

Published19 Nov 2021

Abstract

The nickel-base superalloy Hastelloy N was irradiated using 1 MeV Xe²⁰⁺ and 7 MeV Xe²⁶⁺ ions with displacement damage ranging from 0.5 dPa to 10 dPa at room temperature (RT). The irradiated Ni-based superalloy was characterized with transmission electron microscopy (TEM), XRD, and nanoindenter to determine the changes in microstructural evolution and nanoindentation hardness. The TEM results showed that ion irradiation induced a large number of defects such as black spots and corrugated structures and the second phase was rapidly amorphized after being irradiated to a fluence of 0.5 dPa. The XRD results showed that the Hastelloy N alloy sample did not undergo lattice distortion after ion irradiation. An obvious irradiation hardening phenomenon was observed in this study, and the hardness increased with Xe ion fluence. The pinning effect in which the defects can become obstacles to the free movement of dislocation may be responsible for the irradiation-induced hardening.

1. Introduction

Nuclear energy will play a more important role in meeting future energy needs for the fast-growing energy demands and concerns about climate changes [1]. The molten salt reactor (MSR), one of the six most promising generation IV nuclear reactor systems, has attracted increasing interest for its incomparable advantages: high inherent safety, reliability, higher power generation efficiency, etc. [2, 3]. However, the development and deployment of MSR systems are hindered by the structural materials. The structural alloys which must be subjected to extremely harsh environments involving high temperature, high neutron doses, and strong molten salt corrosion [4–7]. Thanks to its excellent corrosion resistance and adequate high-temperature strength, the nickel-based Hastelloy N alloy, which was developed by Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) in the 1960s [8], is still considered as the most promising candidate for the structural materials of MSR [9].

As we know, neutron bombardment can induce a microstructural evolution of structural materials during the operation of the reactor, which can degrade their mechanical performances [10–12]. Hence, the evaluation of irradiation damage in structural materials is particularly important. The ion irradiation has advantages such as the easier control of irradiation parameters, reduction of cost and rapid damage production to neutron irradiation, and the high dose and high flux ion irradiation [13–19].

In this study, xenon ions were selected to irradiate the Hastelloy N alloy for their significant displacement damage within the material, which is similar to the neutron irradiation damage behavior. Some thin-foil and bulk specimens of Hastelloy N alloy were irradiated, respectively, with 1 MeV Xe²⁰⁺ ions and 7 MeV Xe²⁶⁺ ions, at different fluences. The bulk and thin-foil specimens were characterized by nanoindentation and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) to study the changes. However, the ion irradiation-induced mechanical properties are difficult to be tested owing to the limitation of ion penetration depth, normally from nanometers to micrometers. In recent years, the nanoindentation test has been widely used to study the irradiation hardening of the reactor structural materials [20, 21], thanks to its powerful capability on thin-layer nanohardness measurement [22]. The correlation between the irradiation-induced formation of defects and irradiation-induced hardening was quantitatively analyzed.

2. Experimental

The Hastelloy N alloy used was subjected to cold-rolling and annealing treatment (for 6 min at 1177°C, water quenching). The overall chemical composition of Hastelloy N alloy is provided in Table 1. The bulk materials were cut into several plates with a dimension of 10 × 10 × 1 mm³ using a wire electrode and polished with silicon carbide paper from grade 800 to 2000, by means of vibration polishing (including nanoalumina powder ∼20 nm), to obtain a mirror-like surface. These mechanically polished plates were subsequently prepared by electropolishing at 36 V for about 10 s in an aqueous solution of 50% H₂SO₄ and 40% glycerin under the temperature of 0°C, followed by ultrasonic cleaning using alcohol and deionized water sequentially. Several specimens were prepared as disks of 3 mm in diameter for TEM studies. Thin foils were obtained by mechanical thinning of the disks down to 100 μm, followed by twin-jet electropolishing, with an alcoholic solution of 5% HClO₄.

The as-prepared samples were irradiated at room temperature (RT), on the 320 KV Highly Charged Ions Research Platform, at the Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences (HCIRP-IMP-CAS) [23]. The bulk samples were irradiated with 7 MeV Xe²⁶⁺ ions to fluences of 0, 1.25 × 10¹⁴, 5.0 × 10¹⁴, 1.25 × 10¹⁵, and 2.5 × 10¹⁵ ions/cm² equivalent to a maximum damage of 0, 0.5, 2, 5, and 10 dPa. For the thin-foil specimens, the irradiation of 1 MeV Xe²⁰⁺ ions was chosen to make sure that the irradiation damage depth is suitable to the thickness of the thin area (less than 150 nm).

The ion irradiation-induced microstructural evolution of the Hastelloy N alloy samples was characterized by a FEI Tecnai G2 F20 transmission electron microscope with an accelerating voltage of 200 kV. In order to reveal the correlation between the changes in mechanical properties and the microstructural evolution, the nanoindentation hardness of the un-irradiated and irradiated samples was measured on a G200 nanoindenter instrument. The experimental hardness was determined from the analysis of load-displacement (P–h) curves using the Oliver and Pharr method [24, 25]. In this study, five single indents were performed for each sample to ensure the reliability of the measurements.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. TEM Characterization

Bright-field TEM micrographs of the un-irradiated Hastelloy N sample are shown in Figure 1. Except for some dislocation lines, almost no other defects were observed in the un-irradiated sample. Figure 2 shows the TEM micrographs of Hastelloy N after ion irradiation to 0.5, 2, 5, and 10 dPa. Irradiating to a fluence equivalent to 0.5 dPa caused the disappearance of the original dislocations in the alloy and appearance of obvious black spots of about 5∼10 nm in the alloy. These black spots may be dislocation loops [26, 27], stacking fault tetrahedra (SFTs) [28], or defect clusters [29, 30]. When the irradiation fluence reached 2 dPa, corrugated-like structures began to gradually form, as shown in Figure 2(b), and this stage was the initial stage of the corrugated structure. At 5 dPa, black spots started to mix with the corrugated-like structures. Figures 2(c) and 2(d) show that the morphology of the corrugated-like structure became more and more obvious with the increase in ion fluence, which means that the corrugated structure is the final formation stage of the irradiated superalloy.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

To study the characteristics of the irradiated Hastelloy N alloy, the element mapping was performed to investigate the atomic migration and element distribution of the alloy after irradiation (Figure 3). Figure 3(a) shows the TEM morphology results of the alloy viewed along the <110> axis, and Figures 3(b)–3(g) show the element mapping results of the corrugated-like structure. It can be seen that the ion irradiation has caused a huge change in the alloy and some elements are unevenly distributed in the alloy (e.g., Figure 3(b)), but the other elements are still uniformly distributed in the alloy (e.g., Figures 3(c)–3(g)), which indicate that Xe ion irradiation can make some specific elements to segregate. Considering that irradiation will only make the sample surface smoother, but not make the flat surface more uneven, in this respect, the change of elements may be due to the element segregation and may not be caused by the uneven surface.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

(g)

Ion irradiation affects the alloy structure in many aspects. Here, the second phase of the alloy after ion irradiation was also studied, as shown in Figure 4. Figure 4(a) shows that the second phase in the un-irradiated alloy has a face-centered cubic structure. Its lattice constant a was found to be 1.09 nm, which is consistent with the M₆C, reported in Hastelloy N alloy by Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) [31]. However, the M₆C can be rapidly amorphized with a lower fluence of 0.5 dPa (Figure 4(b)) and the amorphous state is still stable with a higher fluence (Figures 4(c)–4(e)). This is different from the MSRE results that the neutron irradiation would accelerate the formation of small M₆C along the grain boundaries and would not change the structure of M₆C.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

It was reported in the literature that irradiation will cause the physical, chemical, and mechanical properties of the alloy grain boundaries to be reduced [32]. In this study, we analyzed the element distribution of the grain boundaries before and after ion irradiation (Figures 5 and 6). However, the results showed that there was no obvious phenomenon of element segregation along the grain boundaries.

To investigate the elemental difference between the second phase and the matrix before and after irradiation, a line scan analysis was performed between the second phase and the matrix using transmission electron microscopy (Figures 7 and 8). The results of the line scan showed that the second phase was enriched with Mo and Si, while the Ni, Fe, and Cr contents in the matrix were relatively high; as for Mn, it was relatively uniformly distributed in the second phase and the matrix.

3.2. XRD

The alloy samples were analyzed by the grazing incidence X-ray diffraction (GIXRD) test method. Figure 9 compares the strongest diffraction peaks of un-irradiated and irradiated samples. It can be seen that the positions of the diffraction peak of the sample have inconspicuous deflection at the experimental condition, which reveals that no obvious lattice distortions occur. This phenomenon may be true for the relatively lower irradiation fluence or less irradiation area; undoubtedly, the excellent irradiation-resistant property of the alloy may make the alloy sustain less irradiation damage at the experimental condition.

3.3. Nanoindentation

In this study, nanoindentation was performed on pristine and irradiated samples using a G200 nanoindenter system with a Berkovich-type indentation tip. 5 single indents were performed for each sample to ensure the reliability of the measurements. T hardness of the samples gradually decreased with increasing indentation depth as clearly observed in Figure 10. In light of the presence of strain rate effects around the tip, the uncertainty in the indenter tip geometry, and other surface artifacts such as surface contamination films [32–34], the data in the depth lower than 200 nm were ignored. In the depth larger than 200 nm, the nanohardness decreased slightly with penetration depth. This can be explained by the Nix–Gao model [35] which predicts the hardness-depth profile to obey the following equation:where H₀ is the hardness at infinite depth and is a characteristic length which depends on the material and the shape of the indenter tip. can be considered as a constant for a given material and indenter. From this equation, it is quite clear that as the indentation depth (h) increases, the measured hardness value decreases gradually and finally approaches H_0, which is consistent with results in Figure 10.

The hardness of Hastelloy N alloy gradually increased with the increase in ion irradiation fluence. Compared to the un-irradiated sample, the irradiated Hastelloy N alloy samples showed an evident hardening phenomenon. In order to get more insight into the changing trend of the hardness with the irradiation fluence, the average hardness of the five groups of different samples before and after irradiation in the range of 200 to 1600 nm was calculated. The results are shown in Figure 11. The hardness of the Hastelloy N alloy sample increased rapidly after being irradiated to 0.5 dPa, then increased slowly after irradiating from above 0.5 dPa to 5 dPa, and remained constant in the samples irradiated to an irradiation fluence equivalent to above 5 to 10 dPa. When the irradiation damage fluence was in the range of 5–10 dPa, the relation curve between the hardness and the depth basically coincided, indicating that there was a hardening saturation phenomenon. These results are similar to the results reported by Chen et al. [35].

During the ion irradiation process, the bombardment of the surface of the material by high-energy particles forms a cascading collision near the surface of the material, which promotes the formation of a large number of supersaturated point defects (vacancies and interstitial atoms) inside the material [36]. It should be emphasized that most of the point defects disappear in a few picoseconds due to recombination and the remaining point defects will exist in the material in the form of monomers or fine clusters, respectively. The presence of these clusters has a pinning effect on the movement of dislocation lines inside the material resulting in an increase in the hardness of the material [37, 38]. Theoretically, as the irradiation fluence increases, the supersaturated point defects generated by the cascade of collisions inside the material gradually increase together with the density of the clusters resulting in the gradual increase in the hardness of the material. In this study, the hardness of the Hastelloy N alloy sample did not change after the ion irradiation from 5 dPa to 10 dPa. The reason may be that the Hastelloy N alloy did indeed produce more irradiation damage at 10 dPa than 5 dPa. However, as the concentration of point defects increases, the diffusion rate also increases accordingly, so that the probability of annihilation of vacancies and interstitial atoms increases resulting in a low number of final point defects remaining in the material irradiated to a fluence of 10 dPa. Hence, the defects are at the same level as in samples irradiated to 5 dPa so that the hardness of the material remains unchanged under these two irradiation fluences.

It is worth noting that there was no formation of voids observed in the samples irradiated to different fluences at RT. In light of the statistical thermodynamic analysis in the literature [39], it is necessary to reach a critical vacancy concentration depending on the nucleation size of a void and the temperature for void nucleation. The no-void formation observed in this study may be attributed to the irradiation temperature, which is room temperature. Generally, the temperature of irradiation-induced void formation is about 0.3–0.55 T_m (T_m is the melting point) [40–44], and due to the fact that the T_m of Hastelloy N alloy is about 1400°C, the void is formed at about 400–700°C.

4. Conclusion

This study was set out to investigate the Xe ion irradiation-induced microstructural evolution and hardening in Hastelloy N alloy:(1)A large number of defects were caused by Xe ion irradiation inside the Hastelloy N alloy, such as black spots and corrugated structures. The corrugated structure formation was the final stage, and the element segregation was found in the corrugated structures.(2)The second phase in Hastelloy N alloy is a face-centered cubic structure, with the lattice constant a = 1.09 nm, and it can be rapidly amorphized after being irradiated to 0.5 dPa. The second phase was enriched with Mo, Si, Ni, Fe, and Cr.(3)Segregation of grain boundary elements was not observed in Hastelloy N alloy before and after irradiation in this study.(4)Irradiation hardness was found in the Hastelloy N alloy, which increased with increase in irradiation fluence. The irradiation-induced hardening initiated at low ion fluence (0.5 dPa) and then saturated at a higher ion fluence in the range of 5 to 10 dPa.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant no. 11605271) and the Youth Innovation Promotion Association, Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grant no. 2016239). The authors are grateful to the Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences (IMP-CAS), for providing the platform for ion irradiation experiments.

References

P. Yvon and F. Carré, “Structural materials challenges for advanced reactor systems,” Journal of Nuclear Materials, vol. 385, no. 2, pp. 217–222, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. W. Rosenthal, P. N. Haubenreich, and R. B. Briggs, “The development status of molten-salt breeder reactors,” Oak Ridge National Laboratory, vol. 4812, 1962.
View at: Google Scholar
W. G. Liu, H. Han, C. L. Ren et al., “The effect of Nb additive on Te-induced stress corrosion cracking in Ni alloy: a first-principles calculation,” Nuclear Science and Techniques, vol. 25, no. 05, pp. 92–96, 2014.
View at: Google Scholar
L. C. Olson, J. W. Ambrosek, K. Sridharan, M. H. Anderson, and T. R. Allen, “Materials corrosion in molten LiF-NaF-KF salt,” Journal of Fluorine Chemistry, vol. 130, no. 1, pp. 67–73, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Nuttin, D. Heuer, A. Billebaud et al., “Potential of thorium molten salt reactorsdetailed calculations and concept evolution with a view to large scale energy production,” Progress in Nuclear Energy, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 77–99, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Mathieu, D. Heuer, R. Brissot et al., “The thorium molten salt reactor: moving on from the MSBR,” Progress in Nuclear Energy, vol. 48, no. 7, pp. 664–679, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. J. Zhang, D. H. Li, H. C. Chen et al., “Ion irradiation-induced swelling and hardening effect of Hastelloy N alloy,” Journal of Nuclear Materials, vol. 489, pp. 180–186, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Huang, J. Gao, B. Radiguet et al., “Microstructural evolution and hardening of GH3535 alloy under energetic Xe ion irradiation at room temperature and 650°C,” Journal of Nuclear Materials, vol. 499, pp. 431–439, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Leblanc, “Molten salt reactors: a new beginning for an old idea,” Nuclear Engineering and Design, vol. 240, no. 6, pp. 1644–1656, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. M. Ghoneim and F. H. Hammad, “Pressure vessel steels: influence of chemical composition on irradiation sensitivity,” International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, vol. 74, no. 3, pp. 189–198, 1997.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. F. Huang, PHD Thesis, University of Rouen, Mont-Saint-Aignan, France, 2012.
S. M. Bruemmer, E. P. Simonen, P. M. Scott, P. L. Andresen, G. S. Was, and J. L. Nelson, “Radiation-induced material changes and susceptibility to intergranular failure of light-water-reactor core internals,” Journal of Nuclear Materials, vol. 274, no. 3, pp. 299–314, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. X. Jin, L. P. Guo, Z. Yang et al., “Microstructural evolution in nickel alloy C-276 after Ar+ ion irradiation,” Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms, vol. 269, no. 3, pp. 209–215, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. K. Zhang, Z. W. Yao, C. Judge, and M. Griffiths, “Microstructural evolution of CANDU spacer material Inconel X-750 under in situ ion irradiation,” Journal of Nuclear Materials, vol. 443, no. 1-3, pp. 49–58, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. F. Huang, J. J. Li, D. H. Li et al., “TEM, XRD and nanoindentation characterization of Xenon ion irradiation damage in austenitic stainless steels,” Journal of Nuclear Materials, vol. 454, no. 1-3, pp. 168–172, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Getto, Z. Jiao, A. M. Monterrosa, K. Sun, and G. S. Was, “Effect of irradiation mode on the microstructure of self-ion irradiated ferritic-martensitic alloys,” Journal of Nuclear Materials, vol. 465, pp. 116–126, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Jin, H. Bei, and Y. Zhang, “Ion irradiation induced defect evolution in Ni and Ni-based FCC equiatomic binary alloys,” Journal of Nuclear Materials, vol. 471, pp. 193–199, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Desormeaux, B. Rouxel, A. T. Motta et al., “Development of radiation damage during in-situ Kr++ irradiation of Fe Ni Cr model austenitic steels,” Journal of Nuclear Materials, vol. 475, pp. 156–167, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Y. Chen, A. L. Wen, C. L. Ren et al., “Theoretical prediction of radiation-enhanced diffusion behavior in nickel under self-ion irradiation,” Nuclear Science and Techniques, vol. 31, no. 8, pp. 53–63, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Heintze, F. Bergner, and M. Hernández-Mayoral, “Ion-irradiation-induced damage in Fe–Cr alloys characterized by nanoindentation,” Journal of Nuclear Materials, vol. 417, no. 1-3, pp. 980–983, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. P. Liu, F. R. Wan, and Q. Zhan, “A model to evaluate the nano-indentation hardness of ion-irradiated materials,” Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms, vol. 342, pp. 13–18, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. B. Liu, R. S. Wang, A. Ren et al., “Evaluation of radiation hardening in ion-irradiated Fe based alloys by nanoindentation,” Journal of Nuclear Materials, vol. 444, no. 1-3, pp. 1–6, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. F. Ziegler, M. D. Ziegler, and J. P. Biersack, “Srim–the stopping and range of ions in matter,” Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms, vol. 268, no. 11-12, pp. 1818–1823, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. C. Olivier and G. M. Pharr, “An improved technique for determining hardness and elastic modulus using load and displacement sensing indentation experiments,” Journal of Materials Research, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 1564–1583, 1992.
View at: Google Scholar
W. C. Olivier and G. M. Pharr, “Measurement of hardness and elastic modulus by instrumented indentation: advances in understanding and refinements to methodology,” Journal of Materials Research, vol. 19, pp. 3–20, 2004.
View at: Google Scholar
F. F. Han, B. M. Zhou, H. F. Huang et al., “The tensile behavior of GH3535 superalloy at elevated temperature,” Materials Chemistry and Physics, vol. 182, pp. 22–31, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. H. Sencer, G. M. Bond, F. A. Garner et al., “Microstructural evolution of Alloy 718 at high helium and hydrogen generation rates during irradiation with 600-800 MeV protons,” Journal of Nuclear Materials, vol. 283-287, pp. 324–328, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. H. Sencer, G. M. Bond, F. A. Garner, M. L. Hamilton, S. A. Maloy, and W. F. Sommer, “Correlation of radiation-induced changes in mechanical properties and microstructural development of alloy 718 irradiated with mixed spectra of high-energy protons and spallation neutrons,” Journal of Nuclear Materials, vol. 296, no. 1-3, pp. 145–154, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. J. Zinkle and Y. Matsukawa, “Observation and analysis of defect cluster production and interactions with dislocations,” Journal of Nuclear Materials, vol. 329-333, pp. 88–96, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. J. Zinkle, N. Hashimoto, D. T. Hoelzer, A. L. Qualls, T. Muroga, and B. N. Singh, “Effect of periodic temperature variations on the microstructure of neutron-irradiated metals,” Journal of Nuclear Materials, vol. 307-311, pp. 192–196, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. E. McCoy, “An evaluation of the molten salt reactor experiment hastelloy N survellance specimens–first group,” 1967.
View at: Google Scholar
Z. Zhu, H. Huang, J. Liu, J. Gao, and Z. Zhu, “Xenon ion irradiation induced hardening in inconel 617 containing experiment and numerical calculation,” Journal of Nuclear Materials, vol. 525, pp. 32–39, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. H. Lee, Y. Lee, W. C. Oliver, and L. K. Mansur, “Hardness measurements of Ar+-beam treated polyimide by depth-sensing ultra low load indentation,” Journal of Materials Research, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 377–387, 1993.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. D. Nix and H. Gao, “Indentation size effects in crystalline materials: a law for strain gradient plasticity,” Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 411–425, 1998.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Chen, Y. Hai, R. Liu et al., “The irradiation hardening of Ni-Mo-Cr and Ni-W-Cr alloy under Xe26+ ion irradiation,” Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms, vol. 421, pp. 50–58, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. F. Rowcliffe, L. K. Mansur, D. T. Hoelzer, and R. K. Nanstad, “Perspectives on radiation effects in nickel-base alloys for applications in advanced reactors,” Journal of Nuclear Materials, vol. 392, no. 2, pp. 341–352, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Jin, L. Guo, Y. Ren, R. Tang, and Y. Qiao, “TEM characterization of self-ion irradiation damage in nickel-base alloy C-276 at elevated temperature,” Journal of Materials Science & Technology, vol. 28, no. 11, pp. 1039–1045, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Teysseyre, Z. Jiao, E. West, and G. S. Was, “Effect of irradiation on stress corrosion cracking in supercritical water,” Journal of Nuclear Materials, vol. 371, no. 1-3, pp. 107–117, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. V. Kozlov, I. A. Portnykh, E. A. Kinev, S. V. Bryushkova, and I. A. Portnykh, “The swelling dependence of cold worked 16Cr-15Ni-2Mo-lMn steel on neutron irradiation temperature, fluence and damage rate during its use as a cladding material in the BN-600 reactor,” in Proceedings of the 2001 International Symposium on Irradiation Effect on Materials ASTM-20, pp. 457–468, West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Jin, X. He, T. Li, S. Ma, R. Tang, and L. Guo, “Microstructural evolution in nickel alloy C-276 after Ar-ion irradiation at elevated temperature,” Materials Characterization, vol. 72, pp. 8–14, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. F. Bates and R. W. Powell, “Irradiation-induced swelling in commercial alloys,” Journal of Nuclear Materials, vol. 102, no. 1-2, pp. 200–213, 1981.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. F. Stubbins and F. A. Garner, “Swelling and microstructure of high purity nickel irradiated with fast neutrons in EBR-II,” Journal of Nuclear Materials, vol. 191-194, pp. 1295–1299, 1992.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. I. Budylkin, E. G. Mironova, V. M. Chernov, V. A. Krasnoselov, S. I. Porollo, and F. A. Garner, “Neutron-induced swelling and embrittlement of pure iron and pure nickel irradiated in the BN-350 and BOR-60 fast reactors,” Journal of Nuclear Materials, vol. 375, no. 3, pp. 359–364, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. I. Porollo, A. M. Dvoriashin, Y. V. Konobeev, and F. A. Garner, “Microstructure and swelling of neutron irradiated nickel and binary nickel alloys,” Journal of Nuclear Materials, vol. 442, no. 1-3, pp. S809–S812, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2021 Yu Hou et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

362

Downloads

583

Citations