Research Article
Benchmark Analysis on Loss-of-Flow-without-Scram Test of FFTF Using Refined SAC-3D Models
Table 3
Initial core flow distribution comparison.
| Channel | Assembly type | Measured mass flow rate (kg/s) | FFTF model Mass flow rate (kg/s) | Discrepancy (%) |
| 1 | DF 3.2 | 633.05 | 632.82 | −0.04 | 2 | DF 4.2 | 152.33 | 152.3 | −0.02 | 3 | DF 3.1 | 499.07 | 498.54 | −0.11 | 4 | DF 3.1 | 289.73 | 289.56 | −0.06 | 5 | DF 4.1 | 99.84 | 99.96 | 0.12 | 6 | DF 4.1 | 152.33 | 153.23 | 0.59 | 7 | SR/CR | 40.91 | 40.76 | −0.37 | 8 | REF 7/72/8A | 52.38 | 52.43 | 0.10 | 9 | REF 8 B/9 | 23.48 | 23.53 | 0.21 | 10 | PIOTA 2 | 24.82 | 24.94 | 0.48 | 11 | PIOTA 6 | 20.5 | 20.37 | −0.63 |
|
|