Research Article

Numerical Study of Natural Circulation Flow in Reactor Coolant System during a Severe Accident

Table 2

Comparison of the main evaluation factors between previous studies and CFD analysis.

ContentsSymbol or eq.EPRI-TR-102818 [9]NUREG-1781 [7]Model 1 (present work)
GeometryReactor-HL-SGHL-SGReactor-HL-SG
MethodExperimentCFDCFD

End of hot legMass flow rate at the end of hot leg (kg/s)mHL0.05990.0586 (−2.2%)0.0610 (1.8%)
Average temperature (°C)Hot flowTh159.3155 (−2.7%)153.1 (−3.9%)
Cold flowTc86.880.1 (−7.7%)80.4 (−7.4%)
Number of hot tubes7582 (9.3%)70 (−6.7%)
Number of cold tubes141134 (−5.0%)146 (3.5%)

Tube bundleMass flow rate at tubes (kg/s)mt0.12000.1206 (0.5%)0.1199 (-0.1%)
Heat transfer rate (W)3,5603,690 (3.7%)3,591 (0.9%)
Average temperature (°C)Hot tubeTht100.8100 (−0.8%)101.2 (0.4%)
Cold tubeTct64.764.7 (0.0%)64.7 (0.0%)
Ratio of mass flow ratemt/mHL2.002.06 (3.0%)1.97 (−1.5%)
Mixed temperature (°C)Tm96.294.2 (−2.1%)94.5 (−1.8%)
Mixing fractionf0.850.80 (−5.9%)0.77 (−9.4%)

HL: hot leg; SG: steam generator.