On the Seismic Response of Protected and Unprotected Middle-Rise Steel Frames in Far-Field and Near-Field Areas

<table>Friction damper utilized in the dynamic tests. (a) Detail of the dissipation node. (b) Force-displacement <svg height="15.1125" id="M3" style="vertical-align:-2.21957pt" version="1.1" viewbox="0 0 37.299999 15.1125" width="37.299999" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,.062,12.162)"><path d="M300 -147l-18 -23q-106 71 -159 185.5t-53 254.5v1q0 139 53 252.5t159 186.5l18 -24q-74 -62 -115.5 -173.5t-41.5 -242.5q0 -130 41.5 -242.5t115.5 -174.5z" id="x28"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,5.944,12.162)"><path d="M599 650l-18 -160l-30 -2q-2 70 -11 94q-5 16 -26 24t-75 8h-94q-27 0 -33.5 -6.5t-12.5 -32.5l-43 -226h108q52 0 72.5 5t31 18t28.5 52h28l-40 -200h-28q-1 42 -6 56.5t-24.5 21t-70.5 6.5h-108l-32 -177q-13 -65 1 -80.5t88 -22.5l-8 -28h-279l6 28q61 5 77.5 20.5
t29.5 81.5l72 387l7.5 40.5t1 26.5t-4 18t-15.5 10t-24 6t-37 4l8 28h461z" id="x1D439"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,16.517,12.162)"><path d="M300 253l-14 -55h-229l14 55h229z" id="x2D"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,22.569,12.162)"><path d="M494 514l-10 -15q-56 76 -106.5 117t-110.5 41q-45 0 -45 -30q0 -28 109 -152q59 -68 86 -118.5t27 -107.5q0 -62 -29.5 -119.5t-86.5 -96.5q-64 -45 -138 -45q-76 0 -121.5 53t-45.5 136q0 74 40.5 135t98.5 95q43 26 87 42q-40 59 -57.5 92t-17.5 62q0 46 39 77.5
t90 31.5q54 0 97.5 -35.5t65 -78.5t28.5 -84zM359 234q0 84 -90 191q-47 -17 -74 -47q-81 -89 -81 -200q0 -71 32.5 -109.5t72.5 -38.5q47 0 80 33t46.5 77.5t13.5 93.5z" id="x1D6FF"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,31.357,12.162)"><path d="M275 270q0 -296 -211 -440l-19 23q75 62 116.5 174t41.5 243t-42 243t-116 173l19 24q211 -144 211 -440z" id="x29"></path></g>
</svg> diagram.</table>

Shock and Vibration

fig2

Figure 2

Figure 2: On the Seismic Response of Protected and Unprotected Middle-Rise Steel Frames in Far-Field and Near-Field Areas 