Shock and Vibration

Shock and Vibration / 2014 / Article
Special Issue

International Conference on Acoustics and Vibration 2012

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2014 |Article ID 434187 | 6 pages | https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/434187

Numerical Time-Domain Modeling of Lamb Wave Propagation Using Elastodynamic Finite Integration Technique

Academic Editor: Hamid Mehdigholi
Received19 Oct 2012
Accepted19 Nov 2012
Published10 Jul 2014

Abstract

This paper presents a numerical model of lamb wave propagation in a homogenous steel plate using elastodynamic finite integration technique (EFIT) as well as its validation with analytical results. Lamb wave method is a long range inspection technique which is considered to have unique future in the field of structural health monitoring. One of the main problems facing the lamb wave method is how to choose the most appropriate frequency to generate the waves for adequate transmission capable of properly propagating in the material, interfering with defects/damages, and being received in good conditions. Modern simulation tools based on numerical methods such as finite integration technique (FIT), finite element method (FEM), and boundary element method (BEM) may be used for modeling. In this paper, two sets of simulation are performed. In the first set, group velocities of lamb wave in a steel plate are obtained numerically. Results are then compared with analytical results to validate the simulation. In the second set, EFIT is employed to study fundamental symmetric mode interaction with a surface braking defect.

1. Introduction

Lamb wave testing technique is increasingly used for assessing defects in thin-wall structures like plate and pipes [13]. Lamb waves are elastic waves whose wavelength is in the same order as thickness of the structure [4]. One of the main advantages of lamb wave technique is that it allows long-range inspection in contrast to traditional ultrasonic testing, where the coverage is limited to a small area in vicinity of each transducer. Lamb waves were first described theoretically by Horace Lamb in 1917 [5]. These waves arise from coupling between shear and longitudinal waves reflected at the top and bottom edges of a thin wall structure [6]. Lamb wave theory can be found in a number of text books [7]. Defects such as corrosion and fatigue cracks cause changes in effective thickness and local material properties and therefore measurement of variations in lamb wave propagation can be used to assess the integrity of plate [1]. Successful usage of lamb waves in an inspection system needs to understand its schemes of propagation in a waveguide and its scattering at defects. Thus, there is an increasing demand for powerful, flexible, and accurate simulation techniques. First works on numerical simulation of ultrasonic waves were done by Harumi (1986) and Yamawaki and Saito (1992) who calculated and visualized bulk wave propagation [8]. Now, numerical simulation of lamb waves is possible. Common techniques which are used to simulate lamb wave propagation are finite difference time domain (FDTD) [9], finite element method (FEM) [5], boundary element method (BEM) [10], elastodynamic finite integration technique (EFIT) [11, 12], and specialized methods for guided wave calculations such as hybrid methods [13] and semianalytical finite element method (SAFEM) [8].

In this work, calculations are based on elastodynamic finite integration technique; historically, finite integration technique was introduced by Weiland in electrodynamics. Fellinger and Langenberg used Weiland’s idea for governing equations of ultrasonic waves in solid, calling it EFIT [14]. EFIT is a grid based numerical time-domain method, using velocity-stress formalism, and easily treats with different boundary conditions which are essential to model ultrasonic wave propagation [12]. Because of its relative simplicity and flexibility, Schubert et al. used EFIT equations to cylindrical coordinates (CEFIT) to simulate axisymmetric wave propagation in pipes with a 2D grid [15]. Schubert also used finite integration technique to simulate elastic wave propagation in porous concrete and showed efficiency of EFIT to model a diverse range of applications [16].

Two sets of simulation results are presented in this work using a program developed in MATLAB environment. In the first one, lamb wave propagation in a 2D steel plate is discussed. Results are then compared with analytical results to validate the accuracy of modeling and, in the second example, interaction lamb wave with a surface breaking defect is investigated.

2. The Elastodynamic Finite Integration Technique for Linear Elastics

2.1. Governing Equations

The governing equations of elastic waves in a general media are the Cauchy equation of motion and equation of deformation rate. These equations are given in integral form for a finite volume and surface as follows: where is the particle velocity vector, is stress tensor, is density, is the outward normal vector on surface , is the body force vector, and is the compliance tensor. The inverse of is the stiffness tensor . Thus, using stiffness tensor, deformation rate equation can be expressed in another form. Consider

In the case of isotropic material can be written as [17] where and are lame constants.

2.2. Spatial Discretized Form of Two Dimensional EFIT

Consider the Cartesian coordinate and ultrasonic wave which propagates in two dimensional -plane. To apply FIT to (1) and (2), squares shown in Figure 1 are used as integral volume , assuming constant and for each volume.

The final results for discretized form are

A same manner of integration equation (1) about a integration cell centered at results in

Now, using the normal stress equations, integration of (3) about and centered at yields

Finally, integration of (3) over integration cell centered at the intersection for material cells results in

As shown in Figure 1, to simplify indexing into stress and velocity arrays of staggered grids when programming the numerics and to keep the same array sizes for all quantities, pseudomaterial cells are used. These cells have the same material properties as the true material they are added to but are not part of physical simulations.

2.3. Time Discretization

Central differences are used to discretize the equations in time domain which results in the velocity and stress components being staggered in time by [15]. Consider where is time interval, superscript is integer number of time step, and dot denotes the time differentiation.

Equations (5)–(8) are solved at all points in simulation space and, by use of (9), the simulation proceeds in time in a “leap frogging” manner. A specific stability condition and adequate spatial resolution must be satisfied to guarantee EFIT convergence and accurate answers [15].

3. Propagation of Lamb Wave in a Steel Plate

In this part, the propagation of lamb wave in a steel plate is simulated using 2D-EFIT. The steel plate has the length  mm and the thickness  mm. Table 1 shows material properties used in this paper.


PropertyValue

Density7700 (kg/m3)
Elastic modulus195 Gpa
Lame constant 96.95 Gpa
Lame constant 76.17 Gpa

As excitation source, point sources at top and bottom borders of plate are used. Figure 2 shows location of applied loads.

Using excitation patterns shown in Figure 2 and dispersion diagram for steel plate (Figure 3), single mode lamb wave is generated which makes signal interpretation easier.

Using 2D-EFIT code developed in MATLAB, propagation of lamb wave in the steel plate is simulated. To guarantee stability and accuracy of results, and are chosen  mm and is  ns. The simulation results using EFIT-tool for symmetric and axisymmetric modes are presented in Figure 4, where the ultrasonic wave field in the plate at time μs is shown (excitation pulse is a raised cosine with five cycles with center frequency of  kHz).

As shown in Figure 4, for the fundamental symmetric mode , the lamb wave field is symmetric about half plane line and, for the fundamental axisymmetric mode , normal component of particle velocity has the same value for every particle with same longitudinal position. From dispersion curve, we find that travels faster than which is validated by simulation results (see Figure 4).

In order to check EFIT accuracy, group velocities obtained from simulation are compared with analytical results at both symmetric and axisymmetric modes (Figures 5 and 6).

Figures 57 show good agreement for simulation results with analytical ones; also Figure 7 shows error dependence on frequency for axisymmetric mode is less than symmetric mode.

4. Reflection of the Fundamental Symmetric Mode ( ) from a Defect

In this section, interaction of the mode with a defected steel plate is analyzed. The results presented here were used for a sizing study of rectangular surface braking defect with different depths and opening length  mm on a steel plate (Figure 8).

The same method used in the proceeding section is used to generate single mode with center frequency of  kHz. However, as the lamb wave interacts with a defect, the axisymmetric mode will be generated. To study lamb wave interaction with a defect, the ratio of the maximum amplitudes for two modes is then calculated and compared at different depths (Figure 9).

Figure 10 shows the ultrasonic wave field in the defected plate at time μs; the defect depth is  mm. As shown in Figure 10, because symmetric modes travel faster than axisymmetric ones, mode separation happens after lamb wave interaction with defect.

5. Conclusion

EFIT was used for studying lamb wave propagation in a steel plate using a program developed in MATLAB environment. Two sets of simulation results were presented in this paper. In the first example, group velocities of lamb wave for different frequencies were obtained using numerical signals and then the results were compared with analytical results; the comparison shows, for both fundamental symmetric and axisymmetric modes, the group velocity values are in good agreement with theoretical ones. In the second example, reflection of mode from a defect is studied and ratio of reflection coefficients was obtained as a function of crack depth which shows that as the crack depth increases the ratio increases. Each calculation presented in this paper was done on ordinary PC (Core i5, 2.4 GHz, 4 GB RAM).

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

References

  1. J. G. Yu, F. E. Ratolojanhary, and J. E. Lebvre, “Guided waves in functionally graded viscoelastic plates,” Journal of Composite Structures, vol. 93, pp. 2671–2677, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  2. V. T. Rathod and D. R. Mahapatra, “Ultrasonic lamb wave based monitoring of corrosion type of damage in plate using a circular array of piezoelectric transducer,” NDT & E International, vol. 44, no. 7, pp. 628–636, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. A. Raghavan and C. E. S. Cesnik, “Review of guided wave structural health monitoring,” Journal of The Shock and Vibration Digest, vol. 39, pp. 91–113, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  4. C. M. Yeum, H. Sohn, and J. B. Ihn, “Lamb wave mode decomposition using concentric ring and circular piezoelectric transducers,” Wave Motion, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 358–370, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
  5. S. Sorohan, N. Constantin, M. Gavan, and V. Anghel, “Extraction of dispersion curves for waves propa-gating in free complex waveguides by standard finite element codes,” Ultrasonics, vol. 51, pp. 503–515, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. V. B. Yadav, T. Piralima, V. Raghuram, and N. N. Kishore, “A finite difference simulation of multi-mode lamb waves in aluminium sheet with experimental verification using laser based ultrasonic generation,” in Proceedings of the 12th Asia-Pacific conference on NDT, Aukland, New Zeland, November 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  7. K. F. Graff, Wave Motion on Elastic Solids, Dover Publications, New York, NY, USA, 1991.
  8. T. Hayashi and J. L. Rose, “Guided wave simulation and visualization by a semianalytical finite element method,” Journal of Materials Evaluation, vol. 61, pp. 75–79, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  9. D. Gsell, T. Leutenegger, and J. Dual, “Modeling three-dimensional elastic wave propagation in circular cylindrical structures using a finite-difference approach,” Journal of Acoustic Society of America, vol. 116, no. 6, pp. 3284–3293, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  10. Z. Xiaoliang and J. L. Rose, “Boundary element modeling for defect characterization potential in a wave guide,” International Journal of Solid and Structures, vol. 40, pp. 2645–2658, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. C. A. C. Leckey, M. D. Rogge, C. A. Miller, and M. K. Hinders, “Multiple-mode lamb wave scattering simu-lations using 3D elastodynamic finite integration technique,” Journal of Ultrasonics, vol. 52, pp. 193–207, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. D. C. Calvo, K. E. Rudd, M. Zampolli, W. M. Sanders, and L. D. Bibee, “Simulation of acoustic scattering from an aluminum cylinder near a roughinterface using the elastodynamic finite integration technique,” Wave Motion Journal, vol. 47, pp. 616–634, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  13. Y. Cho, D. Hongerholt, and J. L. Rose, “Lamb wave scattering analysis for reflector characterization,” IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, vol. 44, pp. 44–52, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  14. R. Marklein, “The finite integration technique as a general tool to computeacoustic, electromagnetic, elastodynamic, and coupled wave fields,” in Review of Radio Science: 1999–2002 URSI, W. Stone, Ed., IEEE Press and John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY, USA, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  15. F. Schubert, A. Peiffer, B. Kohler, and T. Sanderson, “The elastodynamic finite integration technique for waves in cylindrical geometries,” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 104, no. 5, pp. 2604–2614, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. F. Schubert and B. Koehler, “Three-dimensional time domain modeling of ultrasonic wave propagation in concrete in explicit consideration of aggregates and porosity,” Journal of Computational Acoustics, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 1543–1560, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. K. Takata, K. Nakahata, F. Schubert, and B. Kohler, “Image-based FIT modeling for coupled elastody-namic and acoustic problems,” in Proceedings of AIP Conference, vol. 1335, pp. 720–727, 2011. View at: Google Scholar

Copyright © 2014 Hussein Rappel et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

1728 Views | 799 Downloads | 2 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at help@hindawi.com to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19.