Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Shock and Vibration
Volume 2015 (2015), Article ID 183756, 15 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/183756
Research Article

Seismic Response Analysis of Continuous Multispan Bridges with Partial Isolation

1Department of Construction, Civil Engineering and Architecture (DICEA), Polytechnic University of Marche, Via Brecce Bianche, 60131 Ancona, Italy
2School of Architecture and Design (SAD), University of Camerino, Viale della Rimembranza, 63100 Ascoli Piceno, Italy

Received 17 December 2014; Accepted 23 March 2015

Academic Editor: Laurent Mevel

Copyright © 2015 E. Tubaldi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. M. T. A. Chaudhary, M. Abé, and Y. Fujino, “Performance evaluation of base-isolated Yama-agé bridge with high damping rubber bearings using recorded seismic data,” Engineering Structures, vol. 23, no. 8, pp. 902–910, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. G. C. Lee, Y. Kitane, and I. G. Buckle, “Literature review of the observed performance of seismically isolated bridges,” Research Progress and Accomplishments: 2000–2001, MCEER, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, USA, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  3. R. L. Boroschek, M. O. Moroni, and M. Sarrazin, “Dynamic characteristics of a long span seismic isolated bridge,” Engineering Structures, vol. 25, no. 12, pp. 1479–1490, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. J. Shen, M. H. Tsai, K. C. Chang, and G. C. Lee, “Performance of a seismically isolated bridge under near-fault earthquake ground motions,” Journal of Structural Engineering, vol. 130, no. 6, pp. 861–868, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. K. L. Ryan and W. Hu, “Effectiveness of partial isolation of bridges for improving column performance,” in Proceedings of the Structures Congress, pp. 1–10, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. M.-H. Tsai, “Transverse earthquake response analysis of a seismically isolated regular bridge with partial restraint,” Engineering Structures, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 393–403, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. N. Makris, G. Kampas, and D. Angelopoulou, “The eigenvalues of isolated bridges with transverse restraints at the end abutments,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, vol. 39, no. 8, pp. 869–886, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. E. Tubaldi and A. Dall'Asta, “A design method for seismically isolated bridges with abutment restraint,” Engineering Structures, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 786–795, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. E. Tubaldi and A. Dall'Asta, “Transverse free vibrations of continuous bridges with abutment restraint,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, vol. 41, no. 9, pp. 1319–1340, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. G. Della Corte, R. de Risi, and L. di Sarno, “Approximate method for transverse response analysis of partially isolated bridges,” Journal of Bridge Engineering, vol. 18, no. 11, pp. 1121–1130, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. M. N. Fardis and G. Tsionis, “Eigenvalues and modes of distributed-mass symmetric multispan bridges with restrained ends for seismic response analysis,” Engineering Structures, vol. 51, pp. 141–149, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. A. S. Veletsos and C. E. Ventura, “Modal analysis of non-classically damped linear systems,” Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 217–243, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. A. M. Claret and F. Venancio-Filho, “Modal superposition pseudo-force method for dynamic analysis of structural systems with non-proportional damping,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 303–315, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. F. Venancio-Filho, Y. K. Wang, F. B. Lin, A. M. Claret, and W. G. Ferreira, “Dynamic analysis of nonproportional damping structural systems time and frequency domain methods,” in Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology (SMIRT '01), Washington, DC, USA, 2001.
  15. S. Kim, “On the evaluation of coupling effect in nonclassically damped linear systems,” Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 336–343, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. G. Prater Jr. and R. Singh, “Quantification of the extent of non-proportional viscous damping in discrete vibratory systems,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, vol. 104, no. 1, pp. 109–125, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. M. Morzfeld, F. Ma, and N. Ajavakom, “On the decoupling approximation in damped linear systems,” Journal of Vibration and Control, vol. 14, no. 12, pp. 1869–1884, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  18. J. S. Hwang, K. C. Chang, and M. H. Tsai, “Composite damping ratio of seismically isolated regular bridges,” Engineering Structures, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 55–62, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. S. C. Lee, M. Q. Feng, S.-J. Kwon, and S.-H. Hong, “Equivalent modal damping of short-span bridges subjected to strong motion,” Journal of Bridge Engineering, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 316–323, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. P. Franchin, G. Monti, and P. E. Pinto, “On the accuracy of simplified methods for the analysis of isolated bridges,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 380–382, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. K. A. Foss, “Coordinates which uncouple the equations of motion of damped linear dynamic systems,” Journal of Applied Mechanics, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 361–364, 1958. View at Google Scholar
  22. G. Oliveto, A. Santini, and E. Tripodi, “Complex modal analysis of a flexural vibrating beam with viscous end conditions,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, vol. 200, no. 3, pp. 327–345, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. M. Gürgöze and H. Erol, “Dynamic response of a viscously damped cantilever with a viscous end condition,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, vol. 298, no. 1-2, pp. 132–153, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. E. Tubaldi, “Dynamic behavior of adjacent buildings connected by linear viscous/viscoelastic dampers,” Structural Control and Health Monitoring, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  25. C. Truesdell and R. A. Toupin, “The classical field theories,” in Handbuch der Physik, Band III/l, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 1960. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  26. G. Prater Jr. and R. Singh, “Eigenproblem formulation, solution and interpretation for nonproportionally damped continuous beams,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, vol. 143, no. 1, pp. 125–142, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  27. M. N. Hamdan and B. A. Jubran, “Free and forced vibrations of a restrained uniform beam carrying an intermediate lumped mass and a rotary inertia,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, vol. 150, no. 2, pp. 203–216, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. P. A. Hassanpour, E. Esmailzadeh, W. L. Cleghorn, and J. K. Mills, “Generalized orthogonality condition for beams with intermediate lumped masses subjected to axial force,” Journal of Vibration and Control, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 665–683, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  29. N. Ambraseys, P. Smith, R. Bernardi, D. Rinaldis, F. Cotton, and C. Berge-Thierry, Dissemination of European Strong-Motion Data, CD-ROM Collection, European Council, Environment and Climate Research Programme, 2000.
  30. European Committee for Standardization (ECS), “Eurocode 8—design of structures for earthquake resistance,” EN 1998, European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium, 2005. View at Google Scholar