Evolution Balancing of the Small-Sized Wheel Loader Assembly Line
Table 7
Comparison of planning results.
Model
Station
Task
Balancing indexes
Evolution assumptions
Adjustment cost
Load balancing model
1
1, 10
(1) Number of stations: 9 (2) Between-station load: 18
(3) In-station load: 4.5 (4) Correlation of tasks: 4.8
(1) Deleting task 7 (unique task) (2) Deleting task 21 (unique task) (3) Adding one new task in station 8 (4) Adding one new task after deleting task 7
2
2, 9
3
3, 11
4
4, 5
5
6, 12, 13
6
7, 16, 18, 19, 20
7
8, 14, 15, 17
8
21, 22, 23, 24, 26, 28
9
25, 27, 29, 30
Evolution balancing model
1
1, 9
(1) Number of stations: 9 (2) Between-station load: 21 (3) In-station load: 5.1 (4) Correlation of tasks: 4.9
