Research Article
Seismic Fortification Analysis of the Guoduo Gravity Dam in Tibet, China
Table 5
The stress and displacement results of all the typical dam profiles under analysis Cases 1 and 2.
| | Max. | Min. | | | Diversion dam monolith (0 + 65.40) | Diversion dam monolith (0 + 97.00) | Overflow dam monolith (0 + 127.00) | Right dam monolith (0 + 159.00) | Diversion dam monolith (0 + 65.40) | Diversion dam monolith (0 + 97.00) | Overflow dam monolith (0 + 127.00) | Right dam monolith (0 + 159.00) |
| Case 1 | Displacement (cm) | | 0.652 | 0.697 | 0.648 | 0.575 | 0.128 | 0.143 | 0.124 | 0.141 | | −0.23 | −0.259 | −0.293 | −0.259 | −0.49 | −0.57 | −0.679 | −0.559 | Principal stress/MPa | 0.3 | 0.2 | −0.3 | 0.4 | −1.1 | −1.0 | −1.0 | −1.4 |
| Case 2 | Displacement (cm) | | 1.62 | 1.707 | 1.597 | 1.492 | −0.376 | −0.358 | −0.324 | −0.356 | | 0.1 | 0.084 | −0.048 | −0.029 | −0.805 | −0.858 | −0.915 | −0.833 | Principal stress/MPa | 2.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 1.8 | −1.2 | −1.2 | −1.0 | −1.6 |
| Case 4 | Displacement (cm) | | 2.36 | 2.33 | 2.32 | 2.30 | −1.72 | −1.73 | −1.70 | −1.72 | | 1.09 | 1.08 | 0.96 | 1.10 | −1.96 | −1.97 | −1.96 | −1.98 | Principal stress/MPa | 2.0 | 1.5 | 1.8 | 1.4 | 2.0 | −2.0 | −1.8 | −1.5 |
|
|
Note: represents river direction and represents transverse direction (“−” denotes settlement direction).
|