Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Shock and Vibration
Volume 2015, Article ID 467376, 16 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/467376
Research Article

Numerical Simulation of Underwater Shock Wave Propagation in the Vicinity of Rigid Wall Based on Ghost Fluid Method

1School of Civil Engineering, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo, Henan 454000, China
2Department of Modern Mechanics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui 230027, China

Received 25 September 2014; Accepted 17 December 2014

Academic Editor: Chao Tao

Copyright © 2015 Ru-Chao Shi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. T. G. Liu, B. C. Khoo, K. S. Yeo, and C. Wang, “Underwater shock-free surface-structure interaction,” International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 609–630, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  2. S. Shin, “Internal wave computations using the ghost fluid method on unstructured grids,” International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 233–251, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  3. W. F. Xie, T. G. Liu, and B. C. Khoo, “Application of a one-fluid model for large scale homogeneous unsteady cavitation: the modified Schmidt model,” Computers and Fluids, vol. 35, no. 10, pp. 1177–1192, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. A. P. Bhalla, R. Bale, B. E. Griffith, and N. A. Patankar, “A unified mathematical framework and an adaptive numerical method for fluid-structure interaction and rigid, deforming, and elastic bodies,” Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 250, pp. 446–476, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  5. R. Bridson, Fluid Simualtion for Compter Fluids, A K Peters, Natick, Mass, USA, 2007.
  6. M. R. Motley, Y. L. Young, and Z. Liu, “Three-dimensional underwater shock response of composite marine structures,” Journal of Applied Mechanics—Transactions ASME, vol. 78, no. 6, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. A. Schiffer and V. L. Tagarielli, “The response of rigid plates to blast in deep water: fluid-structure interaction experiments,” Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, vol. 468, no. 2145, pp. 2807–2828, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. R. Ghoshal and N. Mitra, “Non-contact near-field underwater explosion induced shock-wave loading of submerged rigid structures: nonlinear compressibility effects in fluid structure interaction,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 112, no. 2, Article ID 024911, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. M. Riley, M. Smith, J. E. van Aanhold, and N. Alin, “Loading on a rigid target from close proximity underwater explosions,” Shock and Vibration, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 555–571, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. M. Greco, G. Colicchio, and O. M. Faltinsen, “A domain-decomposition strategy for a compressible multi-phase flow interacting with a structure,” International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, vol. 98, no. 11, pp. 840–858, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  11. Z. Zong, “Dynamic plastic response of a submerged free-free beam to an underwater gas bubble,” Acta Mechanica, vol. 161, no. 3-4, pp. 179–194, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  12. S. Iakovlev, “Interaction between a submerged evacuated cylindrical shell and a shock wave—part I: diffraction-radiation analysis,” Journal of Fluids and Structures, vol. 24, no. 7, pp. 1077–1097, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. S. Iakovlev, “Interaction between a submerged evacuated cylindrical shell and a shock wave—part II: numerical aspects of the solution,” Journal of Fluids and Structures, vol. 24, no. 7, pp. 1098–1119, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. Q. Li, M. Manolidis, and Y. L. Young, “Analytical modeling of the underwater shock response of rigid and elastic plates near a solid boundary,” Journal of Applied Mechanics, Transactions ASME, vol. 80, no. 2, Article ID 21017, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. S. Beji and K. Nadaoka, “Fully dispersive nonlinear water wave model in curvilinear coordinates,” Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 198, no. 2, pp. 645–658, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  16. H. Zhang, L. Zhu, and Y. You, “A numerical model for wave propagation in curvilinear coordinates,” Coastal Engineering, vol. 52, no. 6, pp. 513–533, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. J. Huang, P. M. Carrica, and F. Stern, “Coupled ghost fluid/two-phase level set method for curvilinear body-fitted grids,” International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, vol. 55, no. 9, pp. 867–897, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  18. A. Baghlani, N. Talebbeydokhti, and M. J. Abedini, “A shock-capturing model based on flux-vector splitting method in boundary-fitted curvilinear coordinates,” Applied Mathematical Modelling, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 249–266, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  19. F.-F. Tong, Y.-M. Shen, J. Tang, and L. Cui, “Water wave simulation in curvilinear coordinates using a time-dependent mild slope equation,” Journal of Hydrodynamics, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 796–803, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. R. G. Hindman, “generalized coordinate forms of governing fluid equations and associated geometrically induced errors,” AIAA Journal, vol. 20, no. 10, pp. 1359–1367, 1982. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. M. J. Berger and R. J. LeVeque, “A rotated difference scheme for cartesian grids in complex geometries,” AIAA Paper CP-91-1602, 1991. View at Google Scholar
  22. J. J. Quirk, “An alternative to unstructured grids for computing gas dynamic flows around arbitrarily complex two-dimensional bodies,” Computers and Fluids, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 125–145, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. R. B. Pember, J. B. Bell, P. Colella, W. Y. Curtchfield, and M. L. Welcome, “An adaptive Cartesian grid method for unsteady compressible flow in irregular regions,” Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 120, no. 2, pp. 278–298, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  24. H. Forrer, “Boundary treatment for a cartesian grid method,” ETH Research Report No. 96-04, 1996. View at Google Scholar
  25. H. Forrer and R. Jeltsch, “A higher-order boundary treatment for Cartesian-grid methods,” Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 140, no. 2, pp. 259–277, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  26. B. Zhang, H. Liu, F. Chen, and G. Wang, “Numerical simulation of flow fields induced by a supersonic projectile moving in tubes,” Shock Waves, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 417–425, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. C.-H. Chang, X. Deng, and T. G. Theofanous, “Direct numerical simulation of interfacial instabilities: a consistent, conservative, all-speed, sharp-interface method,” Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 242, pp. 946–990, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  28. Z. D. Wu, L. Sun, and Z. Zong, “Computational investigation of the mitigation of an underwater explosion,” Acta Mechanica, vol. 224, no. 12, pp. 3159–3175, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  29. A. Lopez Ortega, M. Lombardini, D. I. Pullin, and D. I. Meiron, “Numerical simulation of elastic-plastic solid mechanics using an Eulerian stretch tensor approach and HLLD Riemann solver,” Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 257, pp. 414–441, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  30. R. P. Fedkiw, T. Aslam, B. Merriman, and S. Osher, “A non-oscillatory Eulerian approach to interfaces in multimaterial flows (the ghost fluid method),” Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 152, no. 2, pp. 457–492, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  31. T. G. Liu, B. C. Khoo, and K. S. Yeo, “Ghost fluid method for strong shock impacting on material interface,” Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 190, no. 2, pp. 651–681, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  32. C. W. Wang, T. G. Liu, and B. C. Khoo, “A real ghost fluid method for the simulation of multimedium compressible flow,” SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 278–302, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  33. R. P. Fedkiw, “Coupling an Eularian fluid calculation to a Lagrangian solid calculation with the ghost fluid method,” Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 175, no. 1, pp. 200–224, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. T. G. Liu, J. Y. Ho, B. C. Khoo, and A. W. Chowdhury, “Numerical simulation of fluid-structure interaction using modified ghost fluid method and Naviers equations,” Journal of Scientific Computing, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 45–68, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  35. C.-W. Shu, “Essentially non-oscillatory and weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes for hyperbolic conservation laws,” Brown University Report ICASE-97-65, 1997. View at Google Scholar
  36. A. B. Wardlaw, “Underwater explosion test cases,” IHTR 2069, 1998. View at Google Scholar
  37. T. G. Liu, B. C. Khoo, and W. F. Xie, “Isentropic one-fluid modelling of unsteady cavitating flow,” Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 201, no. 1, pp. 80–108, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  38. S. Osher and J. A. Sethian, “Fronts propagating with curvature-dependent speed: algorithms based on Hamilton-Jacobi formulations,” Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 79, no. 1, pp. 12–49, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  39. D. Adalsteinsson and J. A. Sethian, “The fast construction of extension velocities in level set methods,” Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 148, no. 1, pp. 2–22, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  40. G.-S. Jiang and D. Peng, “Weighted ENO schemes for Hamilton-Jacobi equations,” SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 2126–2143, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  41. T. D. Aslam, “A partial differential equation approach to multidimensional extrapolation,” Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 193, no. 1, pp. 349–355, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  42. A. B. Wardlaw Jr. and J. A. Luton, “Fluid-structure interaction mechanisms for close-in explosions,” Shock and Vibration, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 265–275, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus