Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Shock and Vibration
Volume 2015, Article ID 821750, 25 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/821750
Research Article

Effects of a Group of High-Rise Structures on Ground Motions under Seismic Excitation

State Key Laboratory of Disaster Reduction in Civil Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China

Received 21 April 2015; Revised 14 July 2015; Accepted 30 July 2015

Academic Editor: Matteo Aureli

Copyright © 2015 Qing-jun Chen and Wen-ting Li. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. T. Iwata, T. Kagawa, A. Petukhin, and Y. Ohnishi, “Basin and crustal velocity structure models for the simulation of strong ground motions in the Kinki area, Japan,” Journal of Seismology, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 223–234, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. B. Savage, Regional Seismic wavefield propagation [Ph.D. thesis], California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, Calif, USA, 2004.
  3. N. Maeda, Y. Nakajima, Matsuda, and N. I. Abeki, “Evaluation of seismic amplification characteristics at a university campus with complicated relief of basement,” in Proceedings of the Workshop on Languages and Compilers for Parallel Computing (LCPC '06), Paris, France, November 2006.
  4. A. Wirgin and P.-Y. Bard, “Effects of buildings on the duration and amplitude of ground motion in Mexico City,” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, vol. 86, no. 3, pp. 914–920, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. P. Gueguen, Seismic interaction between soil and buildings: from soil-structure interaction to site-city interaction [Ph.D. thesis], University of Grenoble, Grenoble, France, 2000.
  6. P. Rys and A. Jc, “Fundamental dynamic behavior of foundations on sand,” in ASCE Geotechnical Special Publications, no. 107, pp. 10–19, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  7. E. Kausel, “Early history of soil-structure interaction,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, vol. 30, no. 9, pp. 822–832, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. E. Çelebi, F. Göktepe, and N. Karahan, “Non-linear finite element analysis for prediction of seismic response of buildings considering soil-structure interaction,” Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, vol. 12, no. 11, pp. 3495–3505, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. A. K. Chopra and J. A. Gutierrez, “Earthquake response analysis of multistorey buildings including foundation interaction,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 65–77, 1974. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. R. S. Jangid and T. K. Datta, “Evaluation of the methods for response analysis under non-stationary excitation,” Shock and Vibration, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 285–297, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. N. Kodama and K. Komiya, “Model tests and FE-modelling of dynamic soil-structure interaction,” Shock and Vibration, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 1061–1069, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. S. Adhikari and S. Bhattacharya, “Dynamic instability of pile-supported structures in liquefiable soils during earthquakes,” Shock and Vibration, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 665–685, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. A. Boominathan and R. Ayothiraman, “Measurement and analysis of horizontal vibration response of pile foundations,” Shock and Vibration, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 89–106, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. S. Kobielak, T. Krauthammer, and A. Walczak, “Ground shock attenuation on a buried cylindrical structure by a barrier,” Shock and Vibration, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 305–320, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. Y.-M. Fang and J.-P. Pu, “Field tests and simulation of lion-head river bridge,” Shock and Vibration, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 181–228, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. M. Iguchi, “Dynamic interaction of soil-structure with elastic rectangular foundation,” in Proceedings of the 5th Japanese Earthquake Engineering Symposium, Tokoyo, Japan, 1978.
  17. J. Bielak, “Modal analysis for building-soil interaction,” Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division, vol. 102, no. 5, pp. 771–786, 1976. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. S. Jarernprasert, E. Bazan-Zurita, and J. Bielak, “Seismic soil-structure interaction response of inelastic structures,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, vol. 47, pp. 132–143, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. R. V. Whitman, “The current status of soil dynamics,” Applied Mechanics Reviews, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 1969. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. J. E. Luco and L. Contesse, “Dynamic structure-soil-structure interaction,” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, vol. 63, no. 4, p. 1289, 1973. View at Google Scholar
  21. H. L. Wong and M. D. Trifunac, “Two-dimensional, antiplane, building-soil-building interaction for two or more buildings and for incident plane SH waves,” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, vol. 6, no. 65, pp. 1863–1885, 1975. View at Google Scholar
  22. S. Wang and G. Schmid, “Dynamic structure-soil-structure interaction by FEM and BEM,” Computational Mechanics, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 347–357, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. L. Lehmann and H. Antes, “Dynamic structure–soil–structure interaction applying the symmetric Galerkin boundary element method (SGBEM),” Mechanics Research Communications, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 297–304, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. C. Tsogka and A. Wirgin, “Simulation of seismic response in an idealized city,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 391–402, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. D. Clouteau, O. Ishizawa, and N. Mezher, “Seismic wave propagation in a random city,” in Proceedings of the 7th National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Boston, Mass, USA, 2002.
  26. C. Boutin and P. Roussillon, “Assessment of the urbanization effect on seismic response,” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 251–268, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. N. Mezher, Numerical modelling and quantification of the site-city seismic effect [Ph.D. thesis], École Centrale Paris, Paris, France, 2004.
  28. J. L. Chazelas, P. H. G. Guen, P. Y. Bard, and J. F. Semblat, “Modeling of the site-city effect with centrifuge small scale model (instrumental techniques validation),” in Proceedings of the 6th National Conference on Earthquake Enginerring, pp. 245–252, Palaiseau, France, 2003.
  29. P. Guéguen, P.-Y. Bard, and F. J. Chávez-García, “Site-city interaction in Mexico City-like environments: an analytical study,” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, vol. 92, no. 2, pp. 794–811, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. D. Clouteau and D. Aubry, “Modifications of the ground motion in dense urban areas,” Journal of Computational Acoustics, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 1659–1675, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. R. Y. S. Pak and J. C. Ashlock, “A fundamental dual-zone continuum theory for dynamic soil-structure interaction,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, vol. 40, no. 9, pp. 1011–1025, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. L. A. Padrón, J. J. Aznárez, and O. Maeso, “Dynamic structure-soil-structure interaction between nearby piled buildings under seismic excitation by BEM-FEM model,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 1084–1096, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. S. Naserkhaki, F. N. A. A. Aziz, and H. Pourmohammad, “Earthquake induced pounding between adjacent buildings considering soil-structure interaction,” Journal of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 343–358, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. H. Aldaikh, N. A. Alexander, E. Ibraim, and O. Oddbjornsson, “Two dimensional numerical and experimental models for the study of structure-soil-structure interaction involving three buildings,” Computers & Structures, vol. 150, pp. 79–91, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. K. Kusama and Y. Kitada, “Model test on dynamic cross interaction of adjacent building in nuclear power plants. Overview and outcomes of the project,” in Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology, Prague, Czech Republic, August 2003.
  36. T. Yano, Y. Naito, K. Iwamoto, Y. Kitada, and M. Iguchi, “Model test on dynamic cross interaction of adjacent building in nuclear power plants. Overall evaluation on field test,” in Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology, Prague, Czech Republic, August 2003.
  37. Y. Kitada, T. Hirotani, and M. Iguchi, “Models test on dynamic structure-structure interaction of nuclear power plant buildings,” Nuclear Engineering and Design, vol. 192, no. 2-3, pp. 205–216, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. J. G. Ha and D.-S. Kim, “Evaluation of seismic behavior of soils under nuclear containment structures via dynamic centrifuge test,” Nuclear Engineering and Design, vol. 277, pp. 64–75, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. M. Kham, J.-F. Semblat, P.-Y. Bard, and P. Dangla, “Seismic site-city interaction: main governing phenomena through simplified numerical models,” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, vol. 96, no. 5, pp. 1934–1951, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. F. Ostadan, SASSI2000—A System for Analysis of Soil-Structure Interaction, User's Manual, University of California, Berkeley, Calif, USA, 2000.
  41. K. Uenishi, “The town effect: dynamic interaction between a group of structures and waves in the ground,” Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 811–819, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. X. Lu, Y. Chen, B. Chen, and P. Li, “Shaking table model test on dynamic soil-structure interaction system,” Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 55–64, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar