Research Article  Open Access
Chang Xu, Cong Wang, Jingbo Gao, "Instantaneous Frequency Identification Using Adaptive Linear Chirplet Transform and Matching Pursuit", Shock and Vibration, vol. 2016, Article ID 1762010, 10 pages, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/1762010
Instantaneous Frequency Identification Using Adaptive Linear Chirplet Transform and Matching Pursuit
Abstract
An instantaneous frequency identification method of vibration signal based on linear chirplet transform and WignerVille distribution is presented. This method has an obvious advantage in identifying closely spaced and timevarying frequencies. The matching pursuit algorithm is employed to select optimal chirplets, and a modified version of chirplet transform is presented to estimate nonlinear varying frequencies. Because of the high time resolution, the modified chirplet transform is superior to the original method. The proposed method is applied to timevarying systems with both linear and nonlinear varying stiffness and systems with closely spaced modes. A waveletbased identification method is simulated to compare with the proposed method, with the comparison results showing that the chirpletbased method is effective and accurate in identifying both timevarying and closely spaced frequencies. A bat echolocation signal is used to verify the effectiveness of the modified chirplet transform. The result shows that it will significantly increase the accuracy of nonlinear frequency trajectory identification.
1. Introduction
Natural frequency is a crucial parameter in dynamic systems, and most of the frequency identification methods are based on the Fourier transform. However, these methods are effective only when the frequency contents of the vibration signals are timeinvariant. Linear timevarying (LTV) systems are often used in engineering, such as large flexible structures for outer space exploration, spacecraft, launch vehicles, and vehiclebridge systems [1, 2]. Classical linear timeinvariant models are not capable of describing the nonlinear and/or timevarying characteristics of such systems. Parameter identification methods for LTV systems have been widely studied in the last two decades, but most of them are based on inaccurate and computationally sectional time invariance [3, 4].
Because responses of LTV systems are nonstationary, timefrequency analysis becomes a necessary and unique approach for identification of timevarying parameters of LTV systems. Shi et al. [5] utilized the HilbertHuang transform [6] to identify timevarying system parameters by using free and forced responses and assuming intrinsic mode functions from the empirical mode decomposition (EMD) to be orthogonal to each other. Unfortunately, EMD is not capable of decomposing a signal having multiple components of close frequencies. Chen and Wang [7] proposed a signal decomposition theorem called analytical mode decomposition to address the challenges in closely spaced modes.
Due to its multiresolution analysis ability, wavelet transform has been widely studied for linear and nonlinear system identification. Ruzzene et al. [8] demonstrated the extraction of modal parameters from the continuous wavelet transform (CWT) of a dynamical system’s impulse response. A comparative study of the Morlet wavelet, Cauchy wavelet, and harmonic wavelet for system identification was performed by Le and Argoul [9], and a criterion for choosing mother wavelets was also introduced, with this technique being extended to the response from ambient excitation tests [10]. Based on the orthogonality of wavelet scaling functions, Ghanem and Romeo [11] proposed a method to transform the differential equation of an LTV system into simple linear equations and hence the parameter identification problem became a simple problem of solving linear equations. Xu et al. [12] proposed the use of statespace equations instead of the original highorder differential equation in order to decrease calculation costs. Recently an exploratory study of waveletbased frequency response functions for timevariant systems was presented by Staszewski and Wallace [13]. It is a new way to describe timevariant systems in the timefrequency domain using CWT. However, according to the Heisenberg uncertainty principle, wavelet transform is incapable of simultaneously providing high resolutions in both time and frequency domains. For this reason, great difficulties are encountered in using waveletbased methods for identification of dynamical systems having close and/or fastvarying modal frequencies. Unfortunately, modal frequencies of a highly flexible structure are often very close to each other and they vary with time and the structure’s deformed geometry.
WignerVille distribution (WVD) is a quadratic timefrequency representation of a dynamical signal, and its timefrequency resolution is higher than that of CWT [14]. However, crossterms occur in WVD if the processed signal contains multiple components. Many studies have been done to reduce these crossterms [15]. Chen et al. [16] presented a method called chirplet WignerVille distribution that was capable of representing nonlinear and nonstationary signals effectively. The matching pursuit (MP) algorithm [17] was employed in the chirplet signal decomposition, and the vibration signal is decomposed adaptively into a series of linear chirplets. The method has been applied in fault diagnosis [18] and earthquake signal analysis [19]. A frequency banding operator was introduced by Angrisani and D’Arco [20] in order to represent the nonlinear frequency trajectories. Wang and Jiang [21] introduced a parameter called curvature to extend the original chirplet atom to cubic form, and results show that the accuracy of timefrequency representation is improved. Yin et al. [22] presented a fast refinement algorithm in matching pursuit, which not only reduced the computation cost but also improved the accuracy of adaptive chirplet decomposition.
In this paper, an instantaneous frequency identification method based on chirplet transform (CT) and MP is proposed. The effectiveness of the method in identifying close modes and timevarying systems is investigated in simulated massstiffnessdamping systems. A modified CT is presented to reduce the errors occurring in identifying nonlinear varying frequencies. An echolocation chirp signal is utilized to assess the method for practical signals. The results are compared with the CWTbased method. For completeness, the basic theory of CWT and CT is introduced in Section 2; full identification procedures of CWT and CT are established in Section 3; Section 4 presents the application of the methods to simulated LTV and closemode systems and practical signals. Conclusions are drawn in Section 5.
2. TimeFrequency Representation of Free Vibration Signal
2.1. Continuous Wavelet Transform
A mother wavelet is a square integral function which has the following admissibility condition:where is the Fourier transform of . This kind of function is fast attenuated and supports a short duration in the time domain. A whole family of these functions can be generated by shifts in the time domain and scaling in the scale domain:where is the scale parameter which is related to frequency and is the translation parameter related to time.
The local characteristic and timefrequency representation of a signal can be illustrated by decomposing into wavelet coefficients using the basis of wavelet functions . This can be expressed by the following equations:where is the complex conjugate of and are the wavelet coefficients.
The resolution of the wavelet transform in time and frequency domains is defined by the following equations:where and are the duration and bandwidth of the wavelet function, respectively.
The work presented in this paper utilizes the Morlet wavelet, defined as
The Morlet wavelet is a complex wavelet as shown in Figure 1. Each wavelet basis supports a timefrequency window restricted by . It is noted that an increase of time resolution will lead to a decrease of frequency resolution, which meets the requirements of the Heisenberg uncertainty principle.
Most of the real signals are asymptotic and can be given in the form of the sum of single components:where are the amplitudes and are the phases. It is assumed that, in an asymptotic signal, the variation of phase is much faster than the variation of amplitude. The analytical signal of a single component can be given by
The ridge and skeleton of the CWT contain most of the information of the original signal, with the ridge being defined aswhere is a constant depending on the mother wavelet. Several algorithms can be found to extract the ridge. In this paper, the local maximum algorithm is performed. Once the ridge is obtained, the instantaneous angle frequency can be obtained bywhere is the center angle frequency of the wavelet.
2.2. WVD and Linear Chirplet Decomposition
For an arbitrarily signal , the WVD is defined as
WVD has the highest timefrequency resolution, and it is an ideal approach to represent mono component nonstationary signals. As shown in (10), the WVD is not linear, and the WVD of a sum of multiple signal components is not equal to the sum of the WVD of these signal components. For example, the WVD of signal iswhere is the crossterm. Due to the crossterm interference issue, researchers seldom use it directly to identify timefrequency structures of signals; however, adaptive linear chirplet decomposition combined with WVD is a promising approach to avoid crossterm and obtain high resolution timefrequency representation.
The linear chirplet transform is defined as the inner product of the signal and the chirplet basis function [23]:in this paper, Gauss chirplet is used and its analytical expression is
The Gauss chirplet is generated by time shifting, frequency shifting, scaling, and rotating of the original Gauss function. A typical Gauss mother chirplet and its WVD are shown in Figure 2.
2.3. Matching Pursuit
Since the Gauss chirplets do not form an orthogonal basis, matching pursuit is a promising solution to realize adaptive decomposition. The vital idea of the method is to select optimal chirplets to approach the original signal and decompose step by step using the MP algorithm. can be written aswhere the residual signals areIn the first step, , , and the weighting factor is the canonical inner product of the residual signal and chirplet function ; that is,
The object of MP is to find optimal parameters of chirplets and generate adaptively to minimize the energy of the residual signal:This is equivalent to the following equation:This optimization problem is solved using the method presented by O’Neill and Flandrin [24]. In order to identify the instantaneous frequency, the chirplet spectrum is utilized:where AD represents adaptive decomposition and is the WVD of the optimal chirplets :
The crossterm does not exist in the chirplet spectrogram, and the resolution of timefrequency depends on the durations of the optimal chirplets. Once the chirplet spectrum is obtained, a local maximum algorithm [25] similar to the ridge extraction method is utilized to estimate the instantaneous frequency.
3. Identification Procedure
3.1. Continuous Wavelet TransformBased Method
In the continuous wavelet transformbased (CWT) method, the vibration signal is decomposed using wavelet functions. The resolution is dependent on the time and frequency windows of each wavelet. Instantaneous frequencies can be estimated in different sizes of frequency windows by controlling translation and dilatation. However, as mentioned before, an increase of time resolution will lead to a decrease of frequency resolution, and hence different resolutions will be used in different modes. In the timevarying systems, the frequency resolution varies with time. The identification procedure using CWT is as follows:(1)Calculate the CWT of the vibration signal using the Morlet wavelet.(2)Extract the ridges of the CWT using local maximum algorithm.(3)Estimate the instantaneous frequencies by (9).
3.2. Linear Chirplet TransformBased Method
In the CTbased method, the crossterm of the classical WVD is eliminated. The resolution is dependent on the timefrequency property of optimal chirplets. The MP algorithm ensures the sparsity of the signal decomposition. The noise is departed in the residual signal while most of the timefrequency characteristics of the original response are retained in the selected chirplets. It is also noticed that CWT is a special case of CT where only time shifting and scaling parameters are available and other parameters are equal to zero. The identification procedure using CT is as follows:(1)Obtain the parameters of optimal chirplets via MP algorithm.(2)Calculate the WVD of each optimal chirplet basis. The chirplet spectrum is obtained by the linear weighted sum of the WVDs.(3)Estimate the instantaneous frequencies using local maximum algorithm.
3.3. A Modified Version of CT
Since the basis functions of CT are linear chirplet functions, the method is effective in identifying systems with linear varying frequencies; however, in case of nonlinear varying frequencies, the nonlinear trajectories are approached by several linear segments, and thus significant errors occur. In order to solve this problem, a modified version of CT is utilized. In the matching pursuit process, the key step is to solve the optimization problem presented in (19). In the original CT method, the constraints of parameters in the optimal chirplet are not strict. In order to obtain higher time resolution, the duration of the optimal chirplet is restricted in the modified CT, and hence the number of optimal chirplets becomes larger and the time resolution is improved.
In the modified CT, the duration of optimal chirplets is restricted to of the signal length. Here is defined as the restriction parameter. The time support of selected optimal chirplets depends on . A large value for will lead to high time resolution and vice versa. Thus, the optimization process only chooses the chirplets with short time support. The vibration signal is decomposed using selected short chirplets.
The procedure of the modified CT based method is shown in Figure 3; the difference between the modified version and the classic one is only in the first step matching pursuit where the parameter is introduced. With this parameter, chirplets with wide time duration will not be considered as optimal chirplets to represent the vibration signals; in other words, a constraint condition is added in the original optimization problem. This is significant in analyzing vibration signals with nonlinear varying frequencies.
It should also be noted that the bandwidth of each chirplet gets wider because of the restriction of duration, and the frequency resolution is reduced. Nevertheless, it is still much better than that of the CWTbased method. The effectiveness of the modified CT is verified in the following section.
4. Numerical and Practical Signal Analysis
In this section, several examples of timevarying systems and systems with closely spaced modes are investigated to illustrate the effectiveness and accuracy of the algorithms presented in Figure 3. A twodegreeoffreedom system with closely spaced modes and two singledegreeoffreedom timevarying systems are studied. The identification procedures are performed using the free decay responses of each system. The responses are assumed to be contained with zero mean Gaussian noises and the signaltonoise ratio is 10 dB. The sampling frequency is 10 Hz and the number of samples is equal to 1024. A practical signal is also used to verify the effectiveness of the modified CTbased method.
4.1. Linear TimeVarying Frequency
The singledegreeoffreedom linear timevarying system is governed by the general equation:where , , and are timevarying mass, damping, and stiffness, respectively. is assumed equal to 0 since free vibration is considered. In this case, and are assumed constant, and varies with time linearly: , , . The free decay response is calculated by the 4th RungeKutta method and is shown in Figure 4. Gaussian white noise is added to the response. It can be seen from Figure 5 that the system property can hardly be identified from the time domain response because of the effect of noise.
The FFT spectrum of the response is shown in Figure 6. The signal is analyzed by both CWT and CTbased methods. The CWT scalogram and the CT spectrogram are shown in Figures 7 and 8, respectively.
From the comparison, it can be seen that both of the methods present the true natural frequency of the system. However, a difference is clear: the frequency resolution of CT is much higher than that of CWT. In the CWT scalogram, higher frequency has lower resolution, while the CT spectrogram has uniform resolution for all frequencies. The identification results obtained by local maximum algorithm of both CWT and CT are shown in Figure 9. It is noted that the effect of noise is obvious in the CWT scalogram; however, this phenomenon is not observed in the CT spectrogram. This is because the noise is automatically ignored in the matching pursuit process and only a few chirplets are sufficient to fully describe the vibration signal; only the components which contain a maximum energy in the residual signals are considered. The CTbased method has a better antinoise performance than the CWTbased method.
4.2. Nonlinear TimeVarying Frequency
The methods are applied to another kind of timevarying system: the parameters vary nonlinearly. In this case, varies with time nonlinearly: , , . The frequency of vibration is modulated by a sinusoidal wave.
The CWT scalogram and the CT spectrogram are shown in Figures 10 and 11, respectively. As can be seen in Figure 11, several linear segments are used to approach the sinusoidal wave. The variation of frequency is not well tracked. Although the frequency resolution of CT is much higher than CWT, CWT is more suitable for tracking a nonlinear trajectory (see Figure 10). Similar to the previous case, the results also show that CWT is more sensitive to noise than CT. In this study, a restriction of the duration of chirplets is introduced to overcome the problem. The duration of each chirplet in the time domain is restricted to 5% of the original signal length or less in the iteration process. As a result, more optimal chirplets are required; nevertheless, the decomposition of the signal is still sparse. The improved result is shown in Figure 12, where it can be seen that the frequency trajectory is well tracked, and the high frequency resolution and good antinoise performance are retained in the improved method. The frequency trajectories extracted from both the CWT scalogram and the modified CT spectrogram are shown in Figure 13, which shows that the modified CT is effective and accurate.
In order to evaluate the accuracy of the modified CT, the residual sum of squares (RSS) is introduced as follows:where is the exact value of the parameter, is the identified value, is the total sample number, and is the sample number for each time instant. In order to obtain accurate results, small RSS is needed.
Table 1 shows the RSS of the identification results obtained by CWT, CT, and modified CT. It can be seen that the CTbased method is more accurate than the CWTbased method, and the modified CT is more accurate than the original CT. Thus, the modified CT is a necessary approach when high accuracy is required.

In order to find the optimal value of the restriction parameters , a series of simulations is performed. The RSS of each identification result with different is shown in Figure 14. It can be seen from Figure 14 that, with an increase of , the RSS decrease as expected. After reaches 50, the decrease rate becomes relatively small. Considering that the increase of will increase the computation cost, 50 is the optimal value of in this case. It is also worth noting that the RSS will increase after exceeds 70. This is because the frequency resolution becomes lower, and the influence of noise increases.
4.3. Closely Spaced Modes
A twodegreeoffreedom timevarying system with closely spaced modes is developed to evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed identification methods. The springmassdamper model is shown in Figure 15, where , , , .
Both CWT and CTbased methods are performed to estimate the natural frequencies of the two modes. Figure 16 shows the CWT scalogram and Figure 17 shows the timefrequency distribution of CT. From Figure 17, two closely spaced modes are completely decoupled, and the correct frequencies are identified. However, in Figure 16, two modes are separated only in the very first period; most of the time, they are overlapped. Thus, the CTbased method is more powerful in separating closely spaced modes than the CWTbased method. It is also worth noting that only four linear chirplet basis functions are sufficient to represent the original signal. In other words, only four iterations are required in the matching pursuit, which means the CTbased method can also reduce computational complexity.
4.4. Practical Signal Analysis
In order to verify the effectiveness of the proposed method in the application to real data, the Eptesicus fuscus bat echolocation signal [26] is used. This signal is a typical multicomponent and nonstationary signal. It contains three different modes which are overlapped in both time and frequency domains. Figure 18 shows the signal in the time domain; Figures 19 and 20 are the timefrequency representations obtained by original CT and modified CT, respectively.
From Figures 18 and 19, it can be seen that the frequency trajectories obtained by the modified CT are smoother than those obtained by the original CT. For each mode, Figure 19 only shows a few straight lines while Figure 20 indicates a more complicated variation of instantaneous frequency. Most practical signals contain nonlinear varying frequencies, so the modified CT is a necessary approach to identify frequency trajectories in real systems accurately.
4.5. Discussions
Timefrequency resolution is a key factor in instantaneous frequency identification. As mentioned in Section 2, CWT is not able to obtain high time and frequency resolution simultaneously, and its resolution varies with scale. This disadvantage is obvious in Section 4.3 where closely spaced timevarying frequency is considered, due to the variation of resolution, CWTbased method is not able to track two frequency trajectories accurately. On the other hand, the identification accuracy of CWT can be easily affected by noise. Since the CT method presented in this paper is based on matching pursuit, it is less sensitive to noise. Each selected chirplet possesses independent timefrequency support and their WVDs represent special areas in spectrogram with highest timefrequency resolution. The accuracy of CT and WVD based method mostly depends on the timefrequency support of selected optimal chirplets. It is verified in this section that the accuracy is improved significantly by using modified CT.
In cases of nonlinear varying frequencies, computation cost remains a challenge. Due to the restriction in time support, the number of optimal chirplets increases in the proposed modified approach; in other words, more iterations are required in MP and the computation cost is significantly increased. Introducing a nonlinear basis chirplet is also a promising approach to improve accuracy; see reference [20, 21]; in these methods, only one pursuit is needed for each frequency component; this is similar to “curve fitting” while the proposed method in this paper is similar to “piecewise linear approximation” of nonlinear frequency trajectories. In practical application, the balance between accuracy and efficiency needs to be considered.
5. Conclusions
Instantaneous frequency identification based on CT and WVD is proposed. The adaptive chirplet transform using MP is employed to represent the vibration signal in the timefrequency plane. Complete frequency identification procedure is established, and local maximum algorithm is utilized to extract the instantaneous frequency from the CT spectrogram.
A system with closely spaced modes and two kinds of timevarying systems are investigated to validate the proposed method. The results are compared with an instantaneous frequency identification method based on CWT. Results show that both the CWT and CTbased methods present the true frequencies. However, the frequency resolution of the CTbased method is much higher than that of the CWTbased method; CT clearly separated the close modes while CWT failed. The antinoise performances of the two methods are compared by adding a noise of 10 dB signaltonoise ratio. Results show that the CTbased identification method has an excellent antinoise performance.
A modified version of CT is proposed to identify nonlinear varying frequencies, and its effectiveness is verified using both simulated and practical signals. Results show that the modified CT successfully improves the accuracy in identifying nonlinear varying frequencies.
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.
References
 A. Ghaffari, J. Roshanian, and M. Tayefi, “Timevarying transfer function extraction of an unstable launch vehicle via closedloop identification,” Aerospace Science and Technology, vol. 11, no. 23, pp. 238–244, 2007. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 A. H. Nayfeh and P. F. Pai, Linear and Nonlinear Structural Mechanics, WileyInterscience, New York, NY, USA, 2004. View at: Publisher Site  MathSciNet
 K. Liu, “Identification of linear timevarying systems,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, vol. 206, no. 4, pp. 487–505, 1997. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar  MathSciNet
 K. Liu and L. Deng, “Experimental verification of an algorithm for identification of linear timevarying systems,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, vol. 279, no. 3–5, pp. 1170–1180, 2005. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Z. Y. Shi, S. S. Law, and X. Xu, “Identification of linear timevarying mdof dynamic systems from forced excitation using Hilbert transform and EMD method,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, vol. 321, no. 3–5, pp. 572–589, 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 N. E. Huang, Z. Shen, S. R. Long et al., “The empirical mode decomposition and the Hilbert spectrum for nonlinear and nonstationary time series analysis,” The Royal Society of London. Proceedings A. Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, vol. 454, no. 1971, pp. 903–995, 1998. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar  MathSciNet
 G. Chen and Z. Wang, “A signal decomposition theorem with Hilbert transform and its application to narrowband time series with closely spaced frequency components,” Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, vol. 28, pp. 258–279, 2012. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. Ruzzene, A. Fasana, L. Garibaldi, and B. Piombo, “Natural frequencies and dampings identification using wavelet transform: application to real data,” Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 207–218, 1997. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 T.P. Le and P. Argoul, “Continuous wavelet transform for modal identification using free decay response,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, vol. 277, no. 12, pp. 73–100, 2004. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 T.P. Le and P. Paultre, “Modal identification based on continuous wavelet transform and ambient excitation tests,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, vol. 331, no. 9, pp. 2023–2037, 2012. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 R. Ghanem and F. Romeo, “Waveletbased approach for the identification of linear timevarying dynamical systems,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, vol. 234, no. 4, pp. 555–576, 2000. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 X. Xu, Z. Y. Shi, and Q. You, “Identification of linear timevarying systems using a waveletbased statespace method,” Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 91–103, 2012. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 W. J. Staszewski and D. M. Wallace, “Waveletbased frequency response function for timevariant systems—an exploratory study,” Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, vol. 47, no. 12, pp. 35–49, 2014. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Z. Feng, M. Liang, and F. Chu, “Recent advances in timefrequency analysis methods for machinery fault diagnosis: a review with application examples,” Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 165–205, 2013. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Y. S. Shin and J.J. Jeon, “Pseudo Wigner–Ville timefrequency distribution and its application to machinery condition monitoring,” Shock and Vibration, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 65–76, 1993. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 G. Chen, J. Chen, and G. M. Dong, “Chirplet WignerVille distribution for timefrequency representation and its application,” Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, vol. 41, no. 12, pp. 1–13, 2013. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 S. G. Mallat and Z. Zhang, “Matching pursuits with timefrequency dictionaries,” IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 41, no. 12, pp. 3397–3415, 1993. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 F. Peng, D. Yu, and J. Luo, “Sparse signal decomposition method based on multiscale chirplet and its application to the fault diagnosis of gearboxes,” Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 549–557, 2011. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 P. D. Spanos, A. Giaralis, and N. P. Politis, “Timefrequency representation of earthquake accelerograms and inelastic structural response records using the adaptive chirplet decomposition and empirical mode decomposition,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, vol. 27, no. 7, pp. 675–689, 2007. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 L. Angrisani and M. D'Arco, “A measurement method based on a modified version of the chirplet transform for instantaneous frequency estimation,” IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 704–711, 2002. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Y. Wang and Y.C. Jiang, “Modified adaptive chirplet decomposition with application in ISAR imaging of maneuvering targets,” Eurasip Journal on Advances in Signal Processing, vol. 2008, Article ID 456598, 2008. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Q. Yin, S. Qian, and A. Feng, “A fast refinement for adaptive Gaussian chirplet decomposition,” IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 50, no. 6, pp. 1298–1306, 2002. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar  MathSciNet
 S. Mann and S. Haykin, “The chirplet transform: physical considerations,” IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 43, no. 11, pp. 2745–2761, 1995. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. C. O'Neill and P. Flandrin, “Chirp hunting,” in Proceedings of the IEEESP International Symposium on TimeFrequency and TimeScale Analysis, pp. 425–428, October 1998. View at: Google Scholar
 Ph. Tchamitchian and B. Torrésani, “Ridge and skeleton extraction from the wavelet transform,” in Wavelets and Their Applications, vol. 123, pp. 123–151, 1992. View at: Google Scholar  MathSciNet
 R. Baraniuk, Bat Echolocation Chirp, DSP Group, Rice University, Houston, Tex, USA, 2009, http://dsp.rice.edu/software/batecholocationchirp.
Copyright
Copyright © 2016 Chang Xu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.