Research Article  Open Access
Zhongsheng Chen, Bin Guo, Congcong Cheng, Hongwu Shi, Yongmin Yang, "Chaotic DynamicsBased Analysis of Broadband Piezoelectric Vibration Energy Harvesting Enhanced by Using Nonlinearity", Shock and Vibration, vol. 2016, Article ID 3584740, 11 pages, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/3584740
Chaotic DynamicsBased Analysis of Broadband Piezoelectric Vibration Energy Harvesting Enhanced by Using Nonlinearity
Abstract
Nonlinear magnetic forces are always used to enlarge resonant bandwidth of vibration energy harvesting systems with piezoelectric cantilever beams. However, how to determine properly the distance between two magnets is one of the key engineering problems. In this paper, the Melnikov theory is introduced to overcome it. Firstly, the Melnikov statespace model of the nonlinear piezoelectric vibration energy harvesting (PVEH) system is built. Based on it, chaotic dynamics mechanisms of achieving broadband PVEH by nonlinearity are exposed by potential function of the unperturbed nonlinear PVEH system. Then the corresponding Melnikov function of the nonlinear PVEH system is defined, based on which two Melnikov necessary conditions of determining the distance are obtained. Finally, numerical simulations are done to testify the theoretic results. The results demonstrate that the distance is closely related to the excitation amplitude and frequency once geometric and material parameters are fixed. Under a singlefrequency excitation, the nonlinear PVEH system can generate a periodic vibration around a stable point, a largeamplitude vibration around two stable points, or a chaotic vibration. The proposed method is very valuable for optimally designing and utilizing nonlinear broadband PVEH devices in engineering applications.
1. Introduction
Nowadays, Internet of Things (IoTs) is a research and application hot spot, which can allow objects to be sensed and controlled remotely across existing network infrastructure. A great number of embedded or wireless sensor nodes (WSNs) are distributed in wide and remote areas, such as environmental monitoring, bridge health monitoring, and smart housing. However, there is an urgent need to provide longterm and reliable electrical power for those WSNs. Traditional solutions are to utilize batteries for main sources of WSNs. As we all know that batteries have the drawback of limited life span, they need to be replaced regularly. However, it is often costly and difficult to replace so many batteries, in particular in highly dangerous or unreachable areas. Hence, it is essential for WSNs to have autonomous and longlife power sources. Fortunately, advances in low power design open the possibility of harvesting ambient vibration energy to power WSNs, which is called vibration energy harvesting including electrostatic [1], electromagnetic [2], and piezoelectric mechanisms [3]. In particular, piezoelectric mechanisms are of particular interest due to their high energy densities, no electromagnetic inference, and integration potential, which is always called piezoelectric vibration energy harvesting (PVEH).
In early studies, linear PVEH devices composed of a piezoelectric cantilever beam and a mass attached to the free end are widely investigated. As the piezoelectric cantilever beam oscillates with the host base, the induced mechanical strain produces charges across two electrodes, which can be captured and stored to generate an AC voltage. According to existing conclusions [4], a linear PVEH system can produce the maximum power only when the excitation frequency is equal to its resonant frequency. Otherwise, its harvesting efficiency will greatly decrease once the excitation frequency deviates a little from the resonant frequency. On the other hand, resonant frequency of a PVEH device is closely related to its geometries, so its volume often has to be large in order to reduce the resonant frequency. Consequently, there are many limitations of linear PVEH devices in engineering applications, such as selfpowered embedded wireless sensors. The first reason is that frequency spectrum of ambient vibration is usually broad and timevarying, instead of being sharply peaked at some frequency. The second reason is that frequency spectrums of many ambient vibrations are particularly rich in lowfrequency regions, so it is very difficult to build smallscale, lowfrequency resonant PVEH systems.
In order to overcome the above limitations, nonlinear PVEH systems have been proposed for ten years. Gammaitoni et al. [5] firstly discussed vibration to electricity energy conversion mechanisms by using nonlinear stochastic dynamics. Chen et al. [6] built a general nonlinear PVEH model by combining nonlinear stiffness, nonlinear damping, and nonlinear piezoelectric coupling coefficient simultaneously. Based on it, the effects of different nonlinear parameters on the PVEH system were investigated. By this way, bandwidth of useful frequencies has the potential to be extended. Up to now, most works on nonlinear PVEH can be divided into two classes. The first class is based on Duffinglike equations [5, 7–9]. Under this case, a Duffinglike model is build based on nonlinear dynamics and then analyzed by purely numerical simulations. It can be used to expose the effects of nonlinearity, but the numerical model has little physical meaning and thus is unable to guide practical designing. The second class is based on theoretical analysis and experimental testing [10–12]. For a given PVEH structure, theoretical analysis is done to demonstrate its nonlinearity and experiments are done to validate its broadband characteristics. Among all studies, it is the most easy and common way to construct nonlinear PVEH systems by using magnetic forces [13–17]. According to existing studies, the distance between two magnets is a key geometric parameter once other geometric and material parameters are fixed. It should be determined carefully to construct an expected nonlinear PVEH system. However, how to easily determine the distance between two magnets is still an urgent problem in engineering applications. Otherwise, many trials have to be done, which is much more inconvenient and costly. Thus it is necessary to propose a quantitative criterion of determining the distance.
The Melnikov theory provides a unified framework for studying transitions and chaos in a wide class of deterministic and stochastic nonlinear planar dynamic systems with restoring forces. It can be used to find necessary conditions for homoclinic bifurcations to occur in multiwell systems [18]. This is the same case as nonlinear PVEH systems where restoring forces come from electromechanical coupling force and nonlinear magnetic force. The Melnikov criterion helps in an indirect way in ascertaining the values of different parameters for bifurcations. Stanton et al. [19] numerically studied a Melnikovbased method to characterize the dynamics of the bistable piezoelectric inertial generator, but there is no obvious physical meaning. The goal of this paper is to build necessary conditions of determining a proper distance between two magnets based on the Melnikov method. The left contents are organized as follows: statespace model of one nonlinear PVEH system with nonlinear magnetic force is built in Section 2. In Section 3, a perturbed statespace representation of the nonlinear PVEH system is presented, based on which chaotic dynamics mechanisms of broadband PVEH enhanced by nonlinearity are explained. In Section 4, the Melnikov function of the nonlinear PVEH system is defined and calculated. Based on it, two necessary conditions of determining the distance are proposed. Simulations are done in Section 5 to validate the theoretic results. Finally, conclusions are discussed in Section 6.
2. StateSpace Model of One Nonlinear PVEH System with Nonlinear Magnetic Force
As shown in Figure 1, a typical nonlinear piezoelectric energy harvesting system is composed of a piezoelectric cantilever beam and a pair of permanent magnets. The first magnet is mounted on the free end of the beam as a proof mass and the second magnet is oriented with opposite polarity to the first magnet. The distance between the two magnets is denoted as . The length, width, and thickness of the piezoelectric beam are denoted as , , and , respectively. The proof mass is assumed to be a lumped mass . The vibration displacement of the mass at time is denoted as .
According to previous conclusions [7, 14], electromechanical coupling model of the nonlinear PVEH system in Figure 1 can be formulated aswhere is the equivalent mass of the piezoelectric beam and the proof mass. is the equivalent damper of the piezoelectric beam. is the equivalent stiffness of the piezoelectric beam. is the piezoelectric coupling coefficient. is the equivalent capacitor of the piezoelectric beam. is the displacement of . is the purely resistive load. is the force applied to the mass of the equivalent SDOF model. is the horizontal distance of two magnets. is the vertical component of the repulsive magnetic force (). Generally speaking, is much smaller than , so that we will have
Furthermore, the repulsive magnetic force, , can be approximated as [20]where , , and correspond to the width, height, and thickness of the magnet, respectively. is the residual flux density of the magnet. is calculated by [20]
is an experiential modification function, which is calculated by [20]
According to the Melnikov theory, the first step is to rewrite (1) into a statespace form in order to use the Melnikov method to analyze nonlinear dynamic systems. For the sake of simplicity, is assumed to be a harmonic excitation; that is, . are the excitation magnitude and angular frequency, respectively. Then (1) can be transformed intowhere , , , , , and .
By denoting , , , statespace model of the nonlinear PVEH system can be obtained as (7) from (6):
3. Chaotic Dynamics Mechanisms of Broadband PVEH Enhanced by Nonlinearity
In order to use the Melnikov method, the PVEH system should be represented as a perturbed statespace model. Here it can be easily seen that the perturbation is due to vibration excitation, damping, and electromechanical coupling. Then the perturbed statespace model can be represented as where is a small factor that measures the smallness of the perturbation.
The classical Melnikov method is mainly used for twodimensional systems. However, (8) is obviously a threedimensional system, so here it is difficult to directly use the Melnikov method. In order to overcome this problem, one solution in [19] is referred to for converting the threedimensional system into a twodimensional system. Then, (8) can be represented as a twodimensional form as follows:where
Obviously, when , the unperturbed system is a nonlinear planar dynamic system. Under this case, potential function of the unperturbed PVEH system can be calculated as follows:
It can be seen from (11) that potential function of the unperturbed PVEH system is closely related to the distance (). When the distance () is properly selected, it will be similar to the curve in Figure 2. That is to say, it will be a doublewell dynamic system including two potential barriers. Indeed, the bistability provides essential physical foundation of enhancing broadband PVEH, which has become a research hot spot in recent years [21–23].
According to (9), perturbed forces of the nonlinear dynamic system are from excitation, damping, and electromechanical coupling forces when . Depending on the amount of , different vibration behaviors of the nonlinear PVEH system will occur. When the perturbed force is much smaller, it is difficult for the system to cross the potential barrier. Under this case, the system will periodically be around one of stable positions according to initial conditions. When the perturbed force is too large, the system is able to cross the potential barrier. Under this case, the system will periodically vibrate between two potential wells, leading to a largeamplitude motion. When the perturbed force is intermediate, the motion will be irregular. Under this case, the system may vibrate around one of stable positions or escape stochastically between two stable positions if initial values and excitation frequency satisfy necessary conditions. This kind of transitions is also called a chaotic motion, which is much expected for PVEH. The reason is that continuous transitions between two potential wells definitely provide much more power than chaotic motions, but it may not be guaranteed for broadbands, while chaotic motions at least can provide intermittent largeamplitude oscillations in a broadband. Thus one can understand why nonlinearity can be used to achieve highefficiency broadband PVEH.
In practice, however, the key is how to determine a proper distance () in order to make the nonlinear PVEH system generate a chaotic motion under a given vibration excitation. Fortunately, the Melnikov criterion helps in an indirect way in ascertaining the values of the different parameters for bifurcations. That is to say, when the Melnikov function has simple zeros independent of the small perturbation factor, the stable and unstable manifolds of the perturbed system will intersect each other transversely. Then it implies chaoslike behaviors may occur in the context of the Smale horseshoe map, which is also the research basis of this paper.
4. Melnikov FunctionBased Necessary Conditions of Broadband PVEH Using Nonlinearity
As stated in Section 3, nonlinear magnetic forces can be used to cause the nonlinear PVEH system to be in chaotic conditions. In engineering applications, the distance () between two magnets is the most key parameter once geometric and material properties of the harvesting structure are fixed. However, how to determine is always a difficult task. In order to solve this problem, necessary conditions of determining the distance are proposed based on the Melnikov function.
Based on (9), it can be easily seen that unperturbed nonlinear PVEH system is a Hamiltonian system and the Hamiltonian function is defined as follows:where denotes one orbit in the phase plane of the Hamiltonian system, which depends on initial conditions.
Next three singular points of the unperturbed nonlinear PVEH system can be calculated as follows by setting :
Under this case, it can be seen from basic definitions that is a saddle point and , are two central points located at two sides of . However, it must be noted that and exist only when (14) is satisfied:
Thus (14) is the first necessary condition of determining the distance ().
Furthermore, the orbit described by (12) is a homoclinic orbit which will cross the saddle point (). Under this case, is equal to zero. Then we will have where and . The sign “” just represents the right and left parts of the orbit in the phase plane.
Due to its symmetry, only the sign “+” is considered here. Then (15) can be transformed into
By solving (16), analytic solutions of the homoclinic orbit can be obtained aswhere the superscript “” denotes a homoclinic orbit and “” denotes an imaginary number.
Substituting (17) into (8), the homoclinic orbit () of the output voltage is calculated as
Finally, the Melnikov function of the perturbed nonlinear PVEH system can be defined as follows:where “” denotes the wedge product.
By substituting (17) and (18) into (19), we will havewhere , , , , and . Here, can be calculated numerically.
According to the Melnikov criteria, homoclinic bifurcation and chaotic motions may occur if has simple zeros independent of . Then the following necessary condition must be satisfied based on (20): are closely related to , so (21) is the second necessary condition of determining .
Up to now, the proposed Melnikov necessary conditions of determining the distance are composed of (14) and (21). At the same time, one can see that the second necessary condition is also closely related to excitation amplitude () and angular frequency (). Then one can expect that the excitation angular frequency () in a wide band may satisfy the Melnikov conditions under a proper distance. By this way, one can understand why nonlinearity can be used to enlarge resonant bandwidth of one PVEH system.
5. Simulation Validations
In order to validate the above theoretical results, simulations are carried out to analyze the effects of key parameters on the Melnikov necessary conditions. Also output response characteristics of the nonlinear PVEH system are investigated under different vibration excitations. Firstly, geometric and material properties of the nonlinear piezoelectric structure are listed in Table 1. Under this case, resonant frequency of the piezoelectric cantilever beam is calculated as about 26.4 Hz without considering the second magnet. The excitation frequency is denoted as . That is to say, . The load is fixed as .

5.1. Potential Function of the Unperturbed PVEH System
As stated in Section 3, potential function of the unperturbed PVEH system is an important physical basis of achieving broad bandwidth. Based on (11), potential functions under different distances are plotted and compared in Figure 3. One can see that the double well in the potential function will disappear once the distance is too large or small. The reason may be that when is very small, the magnetic force is so large that the system will be a monostable system. Under this case, neither a largeamplitude nor a chaotic motion will occur despite the vibration excitation, which is not useful for broadband PVEH. Again, one can understand why the distance () should be determined carefully.
(a) mm
(b) mm
(c) mm
(d) mm
(e) mm
(f) mm
5.2. The Effects of the Excitation Amplitude on the Melnikov Necessary Conditions
As stated in Section 4, the first Melnikov necessary condition as (14) must be satisfied in order to cause homoclinic bifurcation and chaotic motion. Based on (14), it can be easily found that the distance should satisfy mm, which is independent of vibration excitations. Furthermore, the second Melnikov necessary condition as (21) is closely related to the excitation amplitude (), so we will focus on the effects of on .
5.2.1. The Effects of on the Bandwidth
Here the distance is fixed as mm according to the first Melnikov necessary condition. Then different excitation amplitudes are selected as . For each , frequency response of is calculated numerically as Figure 4, where the red line denotes the threshold. The following can be seen. (i) For any satisfying (14), there will be a broad frequency band at which (21) is also satisfied. That is to say, homoclinic bifurcation and chaotic motion may occur in the broadband frequency band. At the same time, the frequency band is always located at lowfrequency regions. (ii) As increases, the bandwidth will be enlarged and the central frequency will also increase. These results testify that broadband PVEH can be achieved by using proper nonlinearity.
5.2.2. The Effects of on the Distance
Here the excitation frequency is fixed as Hz. Then different excitation amplitudes are selected as . For each , the curves of with are calculated numerically as Figure 5, where the red line denotes the threshold. The following can be seen. (i) For any given , there is a range of so that the two Melnikov necessary conditions are satisfied, which can help to design proper PVEH devices in practice. (ii) As increases, the range of will be extended.
5.3. Melnikov Scale Factor ()
Denoting in (20), it is obvious that whether the second Melnikov necessary condition is easily satisfied or not depends on once and are given. Thus here is called the Melnikov scale factor. Then the curves of under different distances are shown in Figure 6. One can see the following. (i) Under a given , there is an optimal excitation frequency at which has a maximum value. That is to say, it is the most easy case to satisfy the second Melnikov necessary condition and generate chaotic motions. (ii) As increase, the optimal excitation frequency will shift to lowfrequency regions.
5.4. Output Responses of the Nonlinear PVEH System under a SingleFrequency Excitation
In order to testify three types of motions of the nonlinear PVEH system under different excitation frequencies, three kinds of singlefrequency excitations (, , and ) are used, respectively. Here we choose mm and ; then output responses of the nonlinear PVEH system are shown in Figures 7–9, including the phase plane, voltage, and displacement.
It can be seen from the phase plane in Figure 7 that the nonlinear system vibrates periodically around one of the stable positions when . Under this case, the stable vibration amplitude is small, leading to small output voltages. It can be seen from the phase plane in Figure 8 that the nonlinear system vibrates periodically between two stable points and a largeamplitude motion occurs when . Under this case, the stable vibration amplitude is large, leading to large output voltages. It can be seen from the phase plane in Figure 9 that the nonlinear system escapes stochastically between two stable positions when and a chaotic motion occurs. Under this case, the stable vibration amplitude is also large.
Furthermore, average output powers under the above three motions are calculated as 4.5 mW, 177.4 mW, and 87.2 mW, respectively. It is obvious that average output power under a largeamplitude or chaotic motion is larger than that under a smallamplitude motion. Although average output power under a largeamplitude motion is the largest, it is much more sensitive to the excitation frequency. Thus it is difficult to keep largeamplitude motions due to interrupts in engineering applications. A chaotic motion can occur in a broad frequency band, so it is the most suitable for engineering applications.
Next, we choose mm and . Obviously, the first Melnikov necessary condition as (14) is not satisfied under this distance. At this time, the effect of the nonlinear magnetic force is very small and the nonlinear system degrades to a linear one. Then the phase plane, voltage, and displacement are also calculated as Figure 10. One can see the nonlinear system vibrates periodically around the equilibrium position, instead of a chaotic motion. Under this case, both the stable vibration amplitude and output voltages are smaller than the counterparts under a chaotic motion. Its average output power is calculated as 24.5 mW. By comparing Figure 10 with Figure 7, one can see that a nonlinear PVEH system with a too small distance is even worse than a linear PVEH system.
5.5. Output Responses of the Nonlinear PVEH System under a Broadband Excitation
In order to validate broadband characteristics of the nonlinear PVEH system, a timevarying excitation frequency is used here; that is, , . Two distances, mm and mm, are chosen for comparisons. Obviously, the former denotes a nonlinear PVEH system and the latter denotes a linear one. Then output voltages of the two PVEH systems are calculated as Figure 11. It can be seen that the bandwidth of a nonlinear PVEH system is larger than that of a linear one, while the maximum output voltage of a linear system is only achieved near its resonant frequency.
(a) mm
(b) mm
6. Conclusions
It has been pointed out that nonlinearity by magnetic force can be used to extend resonant frequency bandwidth of a PVEH system. However, how to determine the distance between two magnets is a key problem in engineering applications. In this paper, the Melnikov theory is introduced to solve it. Firstly, the Melnikov statespace model of the nonlinear PVEH system is built. Chaotic dynamics mechanisms of achieving broadband PVEH are exposed by the potential function of the unperturbed nonlinear PVEH system. Then the Melnikov function of the nonlinear PVEH system is defined, based on which two Melnikov necessary conditions of determining the distance are obtained. Finally, simulations are done to testify the theoretic results. Main conclusions include the following. (i) Both a too large and a small distance are not helpful to form double wells. The distance should satisfy the first Melnikov necessary condition. (ii) For a given distance satisfying (14), there will be a broad frequency band satisfying the second Melnikov necessary condition. For a given excitation frequency, there also will be a range of the distance satisfying the two Melnikov necessary conditions. (iii) For any given distance satisfying the first Melnikov necessary condition, there will be an excitation frequency at which the second Melnikov necessary condition is the most easily satisfied. (iv) Under a singlefrequency excitation, the nonlinear PVEH system can generate a periodic vibration around a stable point, a largeamplitude vibration around two stable points, or a chaotic vibration. In addition, it must be noted that the proposed Melnikov conditions are just necessary, not sufficient. The problem needs to be investigated further in future works. Despite it, however, the above conclusions will still be much more significant for designing nonlinear PVEH devices in practice.
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.
Acknowledgment
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grants nos. 51275520 and 51577189).
References
 L. G. W. Tvedt, D. S. Nguyen, and E. Halvorsen, “Nonlinear behavior of an electrostatic energy harvester under wide and narrowband excitation,” Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems, vol. 19, no. 2, Article ID 5404427, pp. 305–316, 2010. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 A. Rahimi, O. Zorlu, A. Muhtaroglu, and H. Kulah, “Fully selfpowered electromagnetic energy harvesting system with highly efficient dual rail output,” IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 2287–2298, 2012. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 K. Junwu, Q. Jinhao, T. Kehong, Z. Kongjun, and S. Chenghui, “Modeling and simulation of piezoelectric composite diaphragms for energy harvesting,” International Journal of Applied Electromagnetics and Mechanics, vol. 30, no. 12, pp. 95–106, 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 S. Roundy, “On the effectiveness of vibrationbased energy harvesting,” Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, vol. 16, no. 10, pp. 809–823, 2005. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 L. Gammaitoni, I. Neri, and H. Vocca, “Nonlinear oscillators for vibration energy harvesting,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 94, no. 16, Article ID 164102, 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Z. S. Chen, B. Guo, Y. T. Luo, and Y. M. Yang, “Numerical investigations into the effects of multiple parameters on nonlinear piezoelectric vibration energy harvesters,” Advances in Mechanical Engineering, vol. 6, Article ID 604704, 2014. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 S. C. Stanton, C. C. McGehee, and B. P. Mann, “Nonlinear dynamics for broadband energy harvesting: investigation of a bistable piezoelectric inertial generator,” Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, vol. 239, no. 10, pp. 640–653, 2010. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 H. Vocca, I. Neri, F. Travasso, and L. Gammaitoni, “Kinetic energy harvesting with bistable oscillators,” Applied Energy, vol. 97, no. 9, pp. 771–776, 2012. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 C. R. McInnes, D. G. Gorman, and M. P. Cartmell, “Enhanced vibrational energy harvesting using nonlinear stochastic resonance,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, vol. 318, no. 45, pp. 655–662, 2008. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 F. Cottone, H. Vocca, and L. Gammaitoni, “Nonlinear energy harvesting,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 102, no. 8, Article ID 080601, 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 D. A. W. Barton, S. G. Burrow, and L. R. Clare, “Energy harvesting from vibrations with a nonlinear oscillator,” Journal of Vibration and Acoustics, vol. 132, no. 2, Article ID 021009, 2010. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 W. Q. Liu, A. Badel, and F. Formosa, “A wideband integrated piezoelectric bistable generator: experimental performance evaluation and potential for real environmental vibrations,” Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, vol. 26, no. 7, pp. 872–877, 2014. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 X. Xing, J. Lou, G. M. Yang, O. Obi, C. Driscoll, and N. X. Sun, “Wideband vibration energy harvester with high permeability magnetic material,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 95, no. 13, Article ID 134103, 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Z.S. Chen and Y.M. Yang, “Stochastic resonance mechanism for wideband and low frequency vibration energy harvesting based on piezoelectric cantilever beams,” Acta Physica Sinica, vol. 60, no. 7, Article ID 074301, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
 B. P. Mann and N. D. Sims, “Energy harvesting from the nonlinear oscillations of magnetic levitation,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, vol. 319, no. 12, pp. 515–530, 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 L. Tang, Y. Yang, and C.K. Soh, “Improving functionality of vibration energy harvesters using magnets,” Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, vol. 23, no. 13, pp. 1433–1449, 2012. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 L. Tang and Y. Yang, “A nonlinear piezoelectric energy harvester with magnetic oscillator,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 101, no. 9, Article ID 094102, 2012. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 K. Yagasaki, “Chaos in a pendulum with feedback control,” Nonlinear Dynamics, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 125–142, 1994. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 S. C. Stanton, B. P. Mann, and B. A. M. Owens, “Melnikov theoretic methods for characterizing the dynamics of the bistable piezoelectric inertial generator in complex spectral environments,” Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, vol. 241, no. 6, pp. 711–720, 2012. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 X. D. Xie, Q. Wang, and N. Wu, “A ring piezoelectric energy harvester excited by magnetic forces,” International Journal of Engineering Science, vol. 77, pp. 71–78, 2014. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 R. L. Harne and K. W. Wang, “A review of the recent research on vibration energy harvesting via bistable systems,” Smart Materials and Structures, vol. 22, no. 2, Article ID 023001, 2013. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 L. Tang, Y. Yang, and C. K. Soh, “Broadband vibration energy harvesting techniques,” in Advances in Energy Harvesting Methods, pp. 17–61, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
 S. P. Pellegrini, N. Tolou, M. Schenk, and J. L. Herder, “Bistable vibration energy harvesters: a review,” Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, vol. 24, no. 11, pp. 1303–1312, 2013. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
Copyright
Copyright © 2016 Zhongsheng Chen et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.