Research Article

Seismic Strengthening Effects Based on Pseudodynamic Testing of a Reinforced Concrete Building Retrofitted with a Wire-Woven Bulk Kagome Truss Damper

Table 2

Results of the preliminary analysis and the reduction effect of base shear force by the KDEC system.

Support structureRatio of elastic modulus (EM) Damper size (mm2) Maximum response displacement at the top level of the building (mm) ⁢Maximum response base shear forceMaximum response displacement of damper (mm)
Shear force (kN)Shear force ratio (%)

Control429.118790

3F10100 × 100428.618666.20.728.57
200 × 200427.318323.42.526.64
300 × 300425.118163.23.324.67
400 × 400421.617171.28.622.24
500 × 500416.616532.212.019.83
600 × 600410.815762.416.117.53
700 × 700405.115058.619.915.43
800 × 800400.014725.621.613.59

5F10100 × 100425.917185.88.562.69
200 × 200417.816569.611.849.21
300 × 300406.915945.415.136.41
400 × 400397.615519.817.426.87
500 × 500390.815321.818.520.32
600 × 600385.815270.018.715.80
700 × 700382.115290.418.612.63
800 × 800379.615360.818.310.33

Control shows the control building without the damper.
The shear force ratio is defined as the maximum response base shear force of the building strengthened using the KDEC system divided by that of the control building without the KDEC system, which indicates the reduction effect in terms of the response base shear force compared with the control building.