A Comparison of Vibroacoustic Response of Isotropic Plate with Attached Discrete Patches and Point Masses Having Different Thickness Variation with Different Taper Ratios

Figure 17

(a) Variation of peak sound power level without taper () and with different taper ratio taken for plate with one patch for cases 1, 2, 3, and 4. (b) Variation of peak sound power level without taper () and with different taper ratio taken for plate with one point mass for cases 1, 2, 3, and 4. (c) Variation of peak sound power level without taper () and with different taper ratio taken for plate with two patches for cases 1, 2, 3, and 4. (d) Variation of peak sound power level without taper () and with different taper ratio taken for plate with two point masses for cases 1, 2, 3, and 4. (e) Variation of peak sound power level without taper () and with different taper ratio taken for plate with four patches for cases 1, 2, 3, and 4. (f) Variation of peak sound power level without taper () and with different taper ratio taken for plate with four point masses for cases 1, 2, 3, and 4.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)