Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Shock and Vibration
Volume 2017 (2017), Article ID 2617534, 11 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/2617534
Research Article

Scaling Mode Shapes in Output-Only Structure by a Mass-Change-Based Method

School of Aerospace Engineering and Applied Mechanics, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China

Correspondence should be addressed to Hanwen Song

Received 5 February 2017; Accepted 27 March 2017; Published 26 April 2017

Academic Editor: Tai Thai

Copyright © 2017 Liangliang Yu and Hanwen Song. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. R. Brincker, “Some elements of operational modal analysis,” Shock and Vibration, vol. 2014, Article ID 325839, 11 pages, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. B. L. Clarkson and C. A. Mercer, “Use of cross correlation in studying the response of lightly damped structures to random forces,” AIAA Journal, vol. 3, no. 12, pp. 2287–2291, 1965. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. H. Akaike, “Power spectrum estimation through autoregressive model fitting,” Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 21, pp. 407–419, 1969. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  4. S. R. Ibrahim, “Random decrement technique for modal identification of structures,” Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, vol. 14, no. 11, pp. 696–700, 1977. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. O. Døssing and C. H. Staker, “Operational deflection shapes: background measurement and application,” in Proceedings of the 5th International Modal Analysis Conference, pp. 1372–1378, London, UK, 1987.
  6. G. H. James III, T. G. Carne, and J. P. Lauffer, “The natural excitation technique (NExT) for modal parameter extraction from operating structures,” Modal Analysis—The International Journal of Analytical and Experimental Modal Analysis, vol. 4, pp. 260–277, 1995. View at Google Scholar
  7. B. Peeters, G. De Roeck, and T. Pollet, “Stochastic subspace techniques applied to parameter identification of civil engineering structures,” in Proceedings of the “New Advances in Modal Synthesis of Large Structures: Nonlinear Damped and Nondeterministic Cases”, pp. 151–162, Lyon, France, 1995.
  8. S. W. Doebling and C. R. Farrar, “Computation of structural flexibility for bridge health monitoring using ambient modal data,” in Proceedings of the 11th Conference on Engineering Mechanics, pp. 1114–1117, Fort Lauderdale, Fla, USA, May 1996. View at Scopus
  9. R. J. Guyan, “Reduction of stiffness and mass matrices,” AIAA Journal, vol. 3, no. 2, p. 380, 1965. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. C. E. Ventura, J. F. Lord, M. Turek, R. Brincker, P. Andersen, and E. Dascotte, “FEM updating of tall buildings using ambient vibration data,” in Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Structural Dynamics (EURODYN '05), pp. 237–242, Paris, France, 2005.
  11. H. Shahverdi, C. Mares, and J. E. Mottershead, “Model structure correction and updating of aeroengine casings using fictitious mass modifications,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, vol. 219, no. 1, pp. 19–30, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. B. Schwarz and M. Richardson, “Using FEA modes to scale experimental mode shapes,” in Proceedings of the 24th Conference and Exposition on Structural Dynamics, Saint Louis, Mo, USA, February 2006. View at Scopus
  13. B. Jaishi, H.-J. Kim, M. K. Kim, W.-X. Ren, and S.-H. Lee, “Finite element model updating of concrete-filled steel tubular arch bridge under operational condition using modal flexibility,” Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 2406–2426, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. D. Hanson, R. B. Randall, J. Antoni, T. P. Waters, D. J. Thompson, and R. A. J. Ford, “Cyclostationarity and the cepstrum for operational modal analysis of MIMO systems—part II: obtaining scaled mode shapes through finite element model updating,” Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 2459–2473, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. M. L. Aenlle and R. Brincker, “Modal scaling in operational modal analysis using a finite element model,” International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, vol. 76, pp. 86–101, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. R. B. Randall, Y. Gao, and J. Swevers, “Updating modal models from response measurements,” in Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Noise and Vibration Engineering, pp. 1153–1160, Leuven, Belgium, 1999.
  17. E. Parloo, P. Verboven, P. Guillaume, and M. Van Overmeire, “Sensitivity-based operational mode shape normalisation,” Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 757–767, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. E. Parloo, P. Verboven, P. Guillaume, and M. Van Overmeire, “Force identification by means of in-operation modal models,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, vol. 262, no. 1, pp. 161–173, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. R. Brincker and P. Andersen, “A way of getting scaled mode shapes in output only modal testing,” in Proceedings of the 21th International Modal Analysis Conference, Orlando, Fla, USA, 2003.
  20. R. Brincker, J. Rodrigues, P. Andersen, and S. V. S. Aps, “Scaling the mode shapes of a building model by mass changes,” in Proceedings of the 22th International Modal Analysis Conference, Dearborn, Mich, USA, 2004.
  21. D. Bernal, “Modal scaling from known mass perturbations,” Journal of Engineering Mechanics, vol. 130, no. 9, pp. 1083–1088, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. D. Bernal, “A receptance based formulation for modal scaling using mass perturbations,” Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 621–629, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. M. López-Aenlle, R. Brincker, F. Pelayo, and A. F. Canteli, “On exact and approximated formulations for scaling-mode shapes in operational modal analysis by mass and stiffness change,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, vol. 331, no. 3, pp. 622–637, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. M. M. Khatibi, M. R. Ashory, and A. Malekjafarian, “Scaling of mode shapes using mass-stiffness change method,” in Proceedings of the 3rd International Operational Modal Analysis Conference, pp. 699–706, Portonovo, Italy, 2009.
  25. M. López-Aenlle, P. Fernández, R. Brincker, and A. Fernández-Canteli, “Erratum to ‘Scaling-factor estimation using an optimized mass-change strategy’ [Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 24 (5)(2010) 1260–1273],” Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, vol. 24, pp. 3061–3074, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  26. M. L. Aenlle, R. Brincker, A. F. Canteli, and L. M. Villa García, “Scaling factor estimation by the mass change method,” in Proceedings of the 1st International Operational Modal Analysis Conference (IOMAC '05), pp. 53–64, Copenhagen, Danmark, April 2005. View at Scopus
  27. P. Fernández, P. Reynolds, and M. López Aenlle, “Experimental evaluation of mass change approaches for scaling factors estimation,” in Proceedings of the 28th IMAC, A Conference on Structural Dynamics, pp. 109–118, Springer, February 2010. View at Scopus
  28. P. Poozesh, D. D. Sabino, J. Baqersad, P. Avitabile, and C. Niezrecki, Practical Techniques for Scaling of Optically Measured Operating Deflection Shapes, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2016.
  29. D. Bernal and B. Gunes, “Damage localization in output-only systems: a flexibility based approach,” in Proceedings of the 20th International Modal Analysis Conference (IMAC '02), pp. 1185–1191, Los Angeles, Calif, USA, February 2002. View at Scopus