Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Shock and Vibration
Volume 2017, Article ID 4895321, 16 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/4895321
Research Article

Sliding Mode Control with PD Sliding Surface for High-Speed Railway Pantograph-Catenary Contact Force under Strong Stochastic Wind Field

1State Key Laboratory of Traction Power, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610031, China
2School of Electrical Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610031, China
3School of Engineering, University of Liverpool, Brownlow Street, Liverpool L69 3GH, UK

Correspondence should be addressed to Zhigang Liu; nc.utjws@gzuil

Received 24 August 2016; Revised 19 November 2016; Accepted 27 November 2016; Published 18 January 2017

Academic Editor: Sergio De Rosa

Copyright © 2017 Yang Song et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. O. Lopez-Garcia, A. Carnicero, and V. Torres, “Computation of the initial equilibrium of railway overheads based on the catenary equation,” Engineering Structures, vol. 28, no. 10, pp. 1387–1394, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. M. Tur, E. García, L. Baeza, and F. J. Fuenmayor, “A 3D absolute nodal coordinate finite element model to compute the initial configuration of a railway catenary,” Engineering Structures, vol. 71, pp. 234–243, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. J. Ambrósio, J. Pombo, F. Rauter et al., “A memory based communication in the co-simulation of multibody and finite element codes for pantograph-catenary interaction simulation,” in Multibody Dynamics, pp. 231–252, Springer, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  4. P. Nåvik, A. Rønnquist, and S. Stichel, “Identification of system damping in railway catenary wire systems from full-scale measurements,” Engineering Structures, vol. 113, pp. 71–78, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. H. Wang, Z. Liu, Y. Song et al., “Detection of contact wire irregularities using a quadratic time-frequency representation of the pantograph-catenary contact force,” IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, vol. 65, no. 6, pp. 1385–1397, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. J. H. Lee, T. W. Park, H. K. Oh, and Y. G. Kim, “Analysis of dynamic interaction between catenary and pantograph with experimental verification and performance evaluation in new high-speed line,” Vehicle System Dynamics, vol. 53, no. 8, pp. 1117–1134, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. Y. Song, Z. Liu, H. Wang, X. Lu, and J. Zhang, “Nonlinear modelling of high-speed catenary based on analytical expressions of cable and truss elements,” Vehicle System Dynamics, vol. 53, no. 10, pp. 1455–1479, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. A. Carnicero, J. R. Jimenez-Octavio, C. Sanchez-Rebollo, A. Ramos, and M. Such, “Influence of track irregularities in the catenary-pantograph dynamic interaction,” Journal of Computational and Nonlinear Dynamics, vol. 7, no. 4, Article ID 041015, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. J. Pombo, J. Ambrosio, M. Pereira, F. Rauter, A. Collina, and A. Facchinetti, “Influence of the aerodynamic forces on the pantograph-catenary system for high-speed trains,” Vehicle System Dynamics, vol. 47, no. 11, pp. 1327–1347, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. Y. Song, Z. Liu, H. Wang, X. Lu, and J. Zhang, “Nonlinear analysis of wind-induced vibration of high-speed railway catenary and its influence on pantograph–catenary interaction,” Vehicle System Dynamics, vol. 54, no. 6, pp. 723–747, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. J.-H. Lee, Y.-G. Kim, J.-S. Paik, and T.-W. Park, “Performance evaluation and design optimization using differential evolutionary algorithm of the pantograph for the high-speed train,” Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, vol. 26, no. 10, pp. 3253–3260, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. J. Ambrósio, J. Pombo, and M. Pereira, “Optimization of high-speed railway pantographs for improving pantograph-catenary contact,” Theoretical and Applied Mechanics Letters, vol. 3, no. 1, Article ID 013006, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. A. Rønnquist and P. Nåvik, “Dynamic assessment of existing soft catenary systems using modal analysis to explore higher train velocities: a case study of a Norwegian contact line system,” Vehicle System Dynamics, vol. 53, no. 6, pp. 756–774, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. P. Nåvik, A. Rønnquist, and S. Stichel, “The use of dynamic response to evaluate and improve the optimization of existing soft railway catenary systems for higher speeds,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, vol. 230, no. 4, pp. 1388–1396, 2015. View at Google Scholar
  15. Z. Liu, P. A. Jönsson, S. Stichel, and A. Ronnquist, “Implications of the operation of multiple pantographs on the soft catenary systems in Sweden,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, vol. 230, no. 3, pp. 971–983, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. A. Facchinetti, L. Gasparetto, and S. Bruni, “Real-time catenary models for the hardware-in-the-loop simulation of the pantograph–catenary interaction,” Vehicle System Dynamics, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 499–516, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. H. Ouyang, “Moving-load dynamic problems: a tutorial (with a brief overview),” Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 2039–2060, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. Y. Pi and H. Ouyang, “Lyapunov-based boundary control of a multi-span beam subjected to moving masses,” Journal of Vibration and Control, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. D. Stancioiu and H. Ouyang, “Optimal vibration control of beams subjected to a mass moving at constant speed,” Journal of Vibration and Control, vol. 22, no. 14, pp. 3202–3217, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  20. Y.-C. Lin, C.-L. Lin, and C.-C. Yang, “Robust active vibration control for rail vehicle pantograph,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 1994–2004, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. Y.-C. Lin, N.-C. Shieh, and V.-T. Liu, “Optimal control for rail vehicle pantograph systems with actuator delays,” IET Control Theory & Applications, vol. 9, no. 13, pp. 1917–1926, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. A. Rachid, “Pantograph catenary control and observation using the LMI approach,” in Proceedings of the 50th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control and European Control Conference (CDC-ECC '11), pp. 2287–2292, IEEE, Orlando, Fla, USA, December 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. D. N. O'Connor, S. D. Eppinger, W. P. Seering, and D. N. Wormley, “Active control of a high-speed pantograph,” Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement and Control, vol. 119, no. 1, pp. 1–4, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. A. Pisano and E. Usai, “Output-feedback regulation of the contact-force in high-speed train pantographs,” Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement and Control, vol. 126, no. 1, pp. 82–87, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. J. Wang, “Active Control of Contact Force for a Pantograph-Catenary System,” Shock and Vibration, vol. 2016, Article ID 2735297, 7 pages, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  26. A. Pisano and E. Usai, “Contact force regulation in wire-actuated pantographs via variable structure control and frequency-domain techniques,” International Journal of Control, vol. 81, no. 11, pp. 1747–1762, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  27. C. Sanchez-Rebollo, J. R. Jimenez-Octavio, and A. Carnicero, “Active control strategy on a catenary-pantograph validated model,” Vehicle System Dynamics, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 554–569, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. C. M. Pappalardo, M. D. Patel, B. Tinsley et al., “Contact force control in multibody pantograph/catenary systems,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part K: Journal of Multi-Body Dynamics, vol. 230, no. 4, pp. 307–328, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  29. Y. Pi and H. Ouyang, “Vibration control of beams subjected to a moving mass using a successively combined control method,” Applied Mathematical Modelling, vol. 40, no. 5-6, pp. 4002–4015, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  30. S. Bruni, J. Ambrosio, A. Carnicero et al., “The results of the pantograph-catenary interaction benchmark,” Vehicle System Dynamics, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 412–435, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. A. G. Davenport, “The application of statistical concepts to the wind loading of structures,” Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 449–472, 1961. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  32. H. A. Panofsky and R. A. McCormick, “The spectrum of vertical velocity near the surface,” Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, vol. 86, no. 370, pp. 495–503, 1960. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  33. M. Aboshi and K. Manabe, “Analyses of contact force fluctuation between catenary and pantograph,” Quarterly Report of RTRI, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 182–187, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus