Shock and Vibration / 2017 / Article / Tab 2

Research Article

Improved Finite Beam Element Method to Analyze the Natural Vibration of Steel-Concrete Composite Truss Beam

Table 2

Comparison of calculation results between the FBEM and ANSYS model (SCCTB-2).

Computation methodsNatural frequencies (Hz)
1st2nd3rd4th5th6th

0.406.71717.31432.19050.82472.88797.708
6.59817.17732.06550.47071.70095.122
6.79518.22435.27857.90386.098119.830

0.606.83317.46532.34750.96673.01397.813
6.73417.37032.28450.68671.90395.307
6.94418.45435.56258.21486.427120.170

0.806.93517.60232.49451.10373.13497.915
6.85317.54832.49150.89372.10095.488
7.07518.66635.83258.51686.750120.504

1.007.02517.72932.63451.23573.25298.014
6.95717.71232.68851.09472.29295.665
7.19018.86436.09058.81087.065120.834

2.007.35218.24233.23451.82673.79698.481
7.33818.38433.53952.00173.18296.501
7.61219.68337.22860.15788.549122.409

10.0796.5644.3962.9442.0261.429

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at help@hindawi.com to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.