Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Shock and Vibration
Volume 2018, Article ID 3456270, 11 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/3456270
Research Article

Forward Analysis of Love-Wave Scattering due to a Cavity-Like Defect

State Key Laboratory of Mechanics and Control of Mechanical Structures, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 29 Yudao Jie, Nanjing 210016, China

Correspondence should be addressed to Zhenghua Qian; nc.ude.aaun@hznaiq

Received 27 December 2017; Accepted 31 January 2018; Published 22 April 2018

Academic Editor: Maosen Cao

Copyright © 2018 Chen Yang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

This paper presents a modified boundary element method (BEM) to solve the scattering problem of Love surface wave from a two-dimensional cavity defect. Because of the truncation of BEM models at a far distance from the cavity, spurious reflected waves are generated. In order to eliminate the unwanted reflections, the guided Love-wave displacement patterns are assumed on the far-field infinite boundaries previously omitted by model truncation, and they are incorporated into the BEM equation set as modified items. The numerical results are verified by theoretical solutions of far-field Green’s functions. Additional parametric studies are performed to find out the influence of truncation distance and defects’ geometric characters on the accuracy of scattered wave solutions.

1. Introduction

The ultrasonic nondestructive testing (NDT) techniques have wide applications for quantitative characterizations of mechanical properties and detection and characterization of cracks and defects. Traditional ultrasonic testing techniques using bulk waves are very time-consuming, since these techniques need an overall inspection of the structure. However, ultrasonic guided waves are attractive for inspection of long-range or wide area structures because they can travel considerable distances and therefore scan large regions for defects in shorter testing time [1, 2].

The current NDT applications of guided waves include pitch-catch [3] or pulse-echo [4], flaw detection method, phased array configuration [5], and diffraction tomography [6]. Generally, these methods make use of time-of-flight (TOF) of the reflected waves from inner defects to locate their approximate positions.

However, further information (e.g., defect shapes or depths) cannot be further utilized because of the complexity of guided waves. Hence, the quantitative nondestructive testing requires a thorough understanding of surface wave scattering in forward and inverse aspects. For the forward problem, we need to solve the near- and far-fields accurately and obtain the scattering coefficients for following inverse reconstruction [79].

The Love-wave is a special kind of guided waves that travels along the surface of elastic layer covered on top of an elastic half-plane. The scattered Love-waves are relied on to investigate underground information in geotechnique engineering, earthquake engineering [10], or detecting flaws and cracks at the bounding interface in nondestructive testing applications [11]. An effective utilization of the Love-wave requires a thorough understanding of its scattering phenomenon.

For the calculation of scattered wave field over a finite domain, various technologies can be implied, like finite element method (FEM) [12], BEM [13], mode-exciting method [14], matrix theory [15], and so on. However, for the forward analysis of a half-plane, the BEM is especially effective, since only the interfaces and flaw boundaries need to be meshed. There are BEM approaches using two kinds of Green’s functions: half-space and full-space. Using the former one, only the flawed portion needs to be meshed; however, Green’s function cannot be written in a closed form. Conversely, using the latter one, the whole interface should be meshed; however, Green’s function is much simpler. Thus, for the forward analysis of Love-wave, we adopt the latter one.

However, in traditional BEM approaches, due to the inevitable artificial truncation of BEM model, spurious reflected waves are introduced in the final results of scattered wave field, which causes considerable error. Another big challenge to solve the scattering problem is the existence of multiple dispersive modes of Love-waves at a certain frequency along with the modal conversion, due to the interaction at the damage location.

Here, a modified BEM for calculating scattered Love-waves is introduced. In this paper, the guided Love-wave displacement patterns are assumed on the far-field infinite boundaries previously omitted, and they are incorporated into BEM equation sets as the modified items. With this improvement, the spurious reflected waves are eliminated. The numerical results are verified by theoretical far-field Green’s functions [16, 17]. Furthermore, various parametric studies of the influence of defect locations and geometrical shapes and size on the calculations of Love-wave scattered fields are carried out in the later sections, which have potential values for investigating forward problem or inverse problem of flaw reconstruction based on surface waves.

2. Statement of the Problem

The Love surface wave propagates along the surface of elastic layer of thickness covered on top of a homogeneous, elastic half-plane, containing a cavity of arbitrary shape on the bonding interface of the - plane (see Figure 1(a)). Here, we consider an incident Love-wave propagating in the -direction, which interacts with the cavity generating forward-scattered and back-scattered surface wave.

Figure 1: Linear superposition principle: (a) the total field; (b) the incident field; (c) the scattered field.

By virtue of linear superposition principle, the total field in the flawed structure defined by Figure 1(a) can be considered as the superposition of the incident and the scattered waves. The incident wave can be treated in the intact (or reference) structure without cavity, as shown by Figure 1(b), and the scattered field is analyzed in the flawed configuration in Figure 1(c). The scattered field is equivalent to the field generated by the contribution of the tractions exerted on the actual surface of the cavity. Furthermore, these tractions are equal in magnitude but opposite in sign to the corresponding tractions produced by the incident Love-wave field on the surface of the fictitious cavity as shown by Figure 1(b). Thus, these tractions can be obtained by calculating the stress components and the outward normal vectors along the fictitious cavity surface using the Cauchy’s formula from the incident field. The dynamic reciprocal theorem is then applied to calculate the scattered wave field equivalent to the radiated field generated by these tractions.

3. Equations

3.1. The Elastodynamic Reciprocal Theorem

The dynamic reciprocal theorem relates two elastodynamic states 1 and 2 of the same bounded or unbounded body, which can be stated aswhere , , and represent body forces, displacements, and stresses, respectively, and is the k component of unit vector outward surface normal to .

Let us consider two-dimensional elastodynamic problems in an isotropic half-plane with a different homogeneous and isotropic layer covered with boundary . The boundary integral equation of antiplane motion for a source point taken on , in the absence of body forces, is developed from (1) and derived aswhere the factor 1/2 is valid only if the boundary is smooth at point and and are the full-space frequency domain elastodynamic antiplane fundamental solution displacement and traction tensors, respectively, which are derived [18] aswhere is the Hankel function of the order of the first kind; , , , and stand for the elastic constants and the wave-numbers of the shear wave at current frequency, for the upper and lower materials, respectively, where , in which and are material densities; represents the distance between and ; and are the displacement and boundary traction, respectively, at the point , respectively, due to a unit line force exerted at . For current antiplane problem, both the line force and Green’s function -- and only have the component.

Let us assume that, except the flaw region and , both the free-traction surface and the interface are flat. Let and be the free upper surface and the interface between upper-layer and half-plane, respectively, and and represent the remaining infinite part of upper and lower boundary, respectively, which will be omitted by truncation in traditional BEM (see Figure 1).

By substituting all boundaries divided in Figure 2 into (2), the BIE of the layered media and half-plane are derived asrespectively, where the superscripts and indicate the Green functions of half-plane and the layer, respectively.

Figure 2: Schematic definition of the computational domain of the Love-wave scattered field, with divided interface boundaries .
3.2. Far-Field Assumption

Since body waves geometrically attenuate in the propagating direction, the far-field displacement solution can be approximated by a series of Love surface waves, neglecting the contribution of body waves.

Therefore, we assume that if the truncated points are located far enough from the source regions, the displacement solutions of the infinite boundary at each side can be expressed aswhere the coordinate vector is in the form of , are defined as the unknown complex amplitudes of the far-field solutions of the th order mode Love-wave. Here, is the number of modes, and represent the th order mode displacement of unit amplitude Love-wave propagating in the positive and negative direction of axis . (Note that Love surface waves are dispersive.)

By virtue of assumptions in (6), (4) and (5) can be rewritten as respectively. From (7), we definewhich represent the corrected items accounting for the contribution of the omitted boundary. Thus, (7) are simplified as

Note that unknown parameters are introduced into the BIEs, which will add degrees of freedom to the final BEM system of the BIEs.

3.3. Correction over the Omitted Part of the Infinite Boundary

In traditional BEM approaches, the contribution of integral terms on the infinite boundary, that is, the fourth term on the right-hand side of (4) and the third term on the right-hand side of (5), is omitted, which introduces considerable error. In order to separately determine the integral terms over infinite boundaries such as and , a multidomain approach is applied, which involves the division of the whole interfaces and boundaries into four regions by introducing two fictitious boundaries and , as shown in Figure 2. Here, an incident Love-wave mode with unit amplitude is introduced propagating along the upper free surface in the positive or negative direction of , respectively (see Figure 3).

Figure 3: Schematic diagram of the multidomain approach: (a) calculate ; (b) calculate ; (c) calculate ; (d) calculate .

Let us choose the Love surface wave of unit amplitude as elastodynamic state 1 and the full-space fundamental solution as elastodynamic state 2. For instance, by virtue of reciprocal theorem seen from (2), the BIE for region 1 is given as

By simplifying (10), we arrive at

By implying an analogous approach for other regions, we can get , and , which are expressed as

Note that for the calculation of and , the incident Love-wave is assumed to propagate in the positive direction, while for and the propagating direction is opposite. The fictitious boundary is, in principle, infinite. However, since the integrand over attenuates rapidly in exponential form away from the interface of half-plane, without loss of accuracy, we consider the boundary as a distance of about two Love wavelengths.

4. Numerical Computation

Numerical solutions of (9) require the discretization of the boundary into elements. After the discretization of the boundary and interpolation of the displacements and tractions, the discretized BIEs for the layer and half-plane can be written for each of nodes and , respectively, aswhere , are the total number of nodes for the layer and half-plane, respectively, is the number of nodes per element, is the same shape function for each element, and represents the intrinsic coordinate of the parent element. It is noted that the calculation of corrected coefficients and is performed in the previous section.

Equations (15) can be expressed in a more concise manner by definingwhere the subscripts represent the collocation points and with the node of element . Then the above equations are rewritten as

Then, let us assemble the local elements , into global matrices , , the node displacement and node traction into global matrices , , and the correction and the unknown amplitudes into the correction matrices and the amplitude matrices . Equation (18) can be written aswhereConveniently, the corrected BEM system can be rewritten aswhere , are block matrices of , and , are the node displacement vectors and node traction vectors corresponding to , respectively.

Analogously, (19) can be expressed in matrix form:wherewhere , are block matrices of , and , are the node displacement vectors and node traction vectors corresponding to , respectively.

It should be pointed out that the unknown coefficient matrices which are assembled into the modified BEM system ((20) and (23)), will add degrees of freedom into the final BEM system of equations. Here, we propose a modified method for Love-wave multimode by introducing finite sequence truncated points on far-field regions. Based on the far-field assumption (see (6)), far-field displacements of sequence points and (see Figure 1) are written aswhich can also be expressed as the form of matrixwherewhere

Then, by virtue of boundary conditions of two kinds, continuity of displacements and stresses, among the boundary , (22) and (26) and (28) and (31) are finally assembled into global BEM system, to obtain the scattering coefficients and displacements directly; thuswhere

5. Numerical Results

In this section, some numerical examples are illustrated to show the validity and effectiveness of this modified BEM for 2D Love-wave model. In the following numerical examples, the material parameters of the layer and half-plane are dimensionless, which have a shear modulus ratio of and a longitudinal wave velocity ratio of , and the dimensionless frequency is taken as . The element size is selected to have at least 32 elements per Love wavelength , which provides accurate results for 2D elastodynamic problem.

Firstly, the numerical results obtained by the modified BEM will be compared with theoretical far-field Green’s functions. As shown in Figure 4, this numerical model is a 2D semifinite space with unit harmonic line source acting in direction, with the distance between source and lower interface of the upper-layer. The far-field amplitudes are presented in Table 1 for various frequencies = 1.2, 6.5, 10.8, while a fixed height . The far-field coefficients of Love-waves are obtained by modified BEM and compared with theoretical results [1, 2]. The results are in excellent agreement (see Table 1), which show the validity of this modified BEM for a certain range of frequencies. From additional parametric study, it is found from Figure 5 that, as the source moved closer to the top surface, for example, , longer surface lengths should remain in the BEM model to ensure the accuracy, which should be kept in mind as a criterion for accurate calculations of these numerical results.

Table 1: Comparisons with truncated locations at ( being the Love wavelength for the lowest mode) for the unit line source problem.
Figure 4: Schematic diagram for the unit line source problem.
Figure 5: Proper truncation distance with various for the unit line source problem.

Next, the lowest incident Love-wave mode for a fixed frequency is selected to impinge onto a cavity defect of arc surface on the bonding interface, with radius and height (see Figure 6). The transmission and reflection coefficients for each modal at various frequencies: , 5, 9.5, are shown in Table 2. And the normalized displacements for the same frequency range which are here defined as are plotted. It is observed from Figures 7(a)7(c) that the scattered displacements are approximated by Love surface waves at far ends, which satisfy the assumptions of (6).

Table 2: The transmission and reflection coefficients with truncated locations at , ( being the Love wavelength for the lowest mode), for a circle arc defect at the bonding interface.
Figure 6: Schematic diagram for Love-wave scattering problem: (a) a cavity defect of arc surface on the bonding interface, with radius and height h; (b) a circle defect in half-plane with radius and depth d.
Figure 7: Normalized amplitudes of upper boundary due to a defect at the bonding interface: (a) ; (b) ; (c) .

For basic check purposes, propagations in the opposite directions for the same frequency range are considered, and numerical solutions show very good agreement in all cases owing to the symmetry of the defect. Furthermore, a parametric study has been carried out to analyze the influence of defect height = 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, on the reflected and transmitted amplitudes which are defined as and . It is found from Figure 8 that as the defect becomes larger, the absolute value of the transmitted amplitude gradually decreases and the absolute value of the reflected amplitude is diverse.

Figure 8: Reflected and transmitted amplitudes due to a defect at the bonding interface.

Finally, we consider the lowest incident Love-wave mode for a fixed frequency impinging onto the circle defect in half-plane with radius and depth , in the positive direction of (see Figure 6(b)). The transmission and reflection coefficients of various frequencies: , 5, 9.5, are performed in Table 3. As the relative normalized displacements are plotted in Figure 9(a)9(c), we could get the same conclusion that the scattered displacements are approximated by Love surface waves at far ends. Also, numerical results for propagation in opposite direction show very good agreement due to the symmetry of the defect.

Table 3: The transmission and reflection coefficients with truncated locations at = ±60, , and ( being the Love wavelength for the lowest mode) for a circle defect in half-plane.
Figure 9: Normalized amplitudes of upper boundary due to a circle defect in half-plane: (a) ; (b) ; (c) .

6. Conclusion

In this paper, we proposed a modified BEM for scattering problem of Love surface wave by a defect. The guided Love-wave displacement patterns are assumed on the far-field infinite boundaries previously omitted, and they are incorporated into the BEM system as the modified items. With this improvement, the spurious reflected waves were eliminated. The validity and effectiveness of this modified BEM were numerically checked by theoretical far-field Green’s functions. Various parametric results show that this method can be applied on the Love-wave model with a defect of arbitrary shape and location, and as the geometrical size of the defect becomes larger, the transmitted wave gradually decreases and the reflected wave is diverse.

In the future, the scattering data from forward analysis by this modified BEM will be used for the inverse analysis of reconstructing both the location and specific geometric information of the debonding cavities.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (nos. 11502108, 11611530686, and 11232007), the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (no. BK20140037), and a project funded by the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD).

References

  1. J. L. Rose, “A baseline and vision of ultrasonic guided wave inspection potential,” Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology, Transactions of the ASME, vol. 124, no. 3, pp. 273–282, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. A. Raghavan and C. E. S. Cesnik, “Review of guided-wave structural health monitoring,” The Shock and Vibration Digest, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 91–114, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. M. Capriotti, H. E. Kim, F. L. di Scalea, and H. Kim, “Non-destructive inspection of impact damage in composite aircraft panels by ultrasonic guided waves and statistical processing,” Materials , vol. 10, no. 6, article no. 616, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. K. M. Qatu, A. Abdelgawad, and K. Yelamarthi, “Structure damage localization using a reliable wave damage detection technique,” in Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Electrical, Electronics, and Optimization Techniques, ICEEOT 2016, pp. 1959–1962, India, March 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. H. F. Wu, A. L. Gyekenyesi, P. J. Shull et al., “Numerical and experimental simulation of linear shear piezoelectric phased arrays for structural health monitoring,” in Proceedings of the SPIE Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring, p. 1016912, Portland, Oregon, United States. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. E. V. Malyarenko and M. K. Hinders, “Ultrasonic Lamb wave diffraction tomography,” Ultrasonics, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 269–281, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. B. Wang and S. Hirose, “Inverse problem for shape reconstruction of plate-Thinning by guided SH-Waves,” Materials Transactions, vol. 53, no. 10, pp. 1782–1789, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. B. Wang and S. Hirose, “Shape reconstruction of plate thinning using reflection coefficients of ultrasonic lamb waves: a numerical approach,” ISIJ International, vol. 52, no. 7, pp. 1328–1335, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. B. Wang, Y. Da, and Z. Qian, “Reconstruction of surface flaw shape using reflection data of guided Rayleigh surface waves,” International Journal of Applied Electromagnetics and Mechanics, vol. 52, no. 1-2, pp. 41–48, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. R. Kakar, “Love waves in Voigt-type viscoelastic inhomogeneous layer overlying a gravitational half-space,” International Journal of Geomechanics, vol. 16, no. 3, Article ID 04015068, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. P. Destuynder and C. Fabre, “Few remarks on the use of Love waves in non destructive testing,” Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - Series S, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 427–444, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  12. X. Jiang, P. Li, J. Lv, and W. Zheng, “An adaptive finite element method for the wave scattering with transparent boundary condition,” Journal of Scientific Computing, vol. 72, no. 3, pp. 936–956, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  13. J. D. Achenbach, “Acoustic emission from a surface-breaking crack in a layer under cyclic loading,” Journal of Mechanics of Materials and Structures, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 649–657, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. A. Gunawan and S. Hirose, “Mode-exciting method for Lamb wave-scattering analysis,” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 115, no. 3, pp. 996–1005, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. P. C. Waterman, “Matrix theory of elastic wave scattering,” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 567–580, 1976. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  16. I. Herrera, “On a method to obtain a Green's function for a multi-layered half-space,” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 1087–1096, 1964. View at Google Scholar
  17. J. D. Achenbach, Reciprocity in elastodynamics, Cambridge Monographs on Mechanics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2003. View at MathSciNet
  18. B. Michel, “Beskos, D. E., Boundary Element Methods in Mechanics. Computational Methods in Mechanics Vol. 3. Amsterdam etc., North-Holland 1987. X, 598 pp., Dfl. 300.–. ISBN 0-444-87990-0 (Mechanics and Mathematical Methods),” ZAMM - Journal of Applied Mathematics and Mechanics / Zeitschrift für Angewandte Mathematik und Mechanik, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 54–54, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar