A Comparative Study on Acoustic Optimization and Analysis of CLD/Plate in a Cavity Using ESO and GA

<table class="figure-group"><tr class="fig-image" id="a"><td><object data="https://static.hindawi.com/articles/sv/volume-2018/7146580/figures/7146580.fig.0015a.svgz" name="7146580.fig.0015a" type="image/svg+xml"></object></td></tr><tr class="fig-caption"><td><b>(a) </b>The first boundary condition</td></tr><tr class="fig-image" id="b"><td><object data="https://static.hindawi.com/articles/sv/volume-2018/7146580/figures/7146580.fig.0015b.svgz" name="7146580.fig.0015b" type="image/svg+xml"></object></td></tr><tr class="fig-caption"><td><b>(b) </b>The second boundary condition</td></tr></table>

<div>Influence for sound power with rejection ratios under various <span class="nowrap"><svg height="12.5794pt" id="M198" style="vertical-align:-3.29107pt" version="1.1" viewbox="-0.0498162 -9.28833 11.0198 12.5794" width="11.0198pt" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,0,0)"><path d="M499 88L487 113C459 86 422 65 413 65C403 65 403 74 409 98L461 318C487 426 460 448 431 448C408 448 383 441 352 424C305 398 223 344 157 257H155L243 674C249 702 249 712 240 712C227 712 170 680 87 673L82 648H117C155 648 162 644 150 590L23 -4L30 -12C55 -4 81 3 105 8C113 53 131 150 143 187C199 281 323 387 372 387C390 387 393 369 380 311L328 86C313 19 319 -12 347 -12C379 -12 442 24 499 88Z" id="g113-105"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.0091,0,0,-0.0091,6.643,3.132)"><path d="M387 400C387 425 348 451 303 451C247 451 176 414 132 376C69 322 24 228 24 148C24 43 74 -12 147 -12C211 -12 301 33 363 103L346 128C319 99 249 51 193 51C148 51 112 84 112 165C112 230 130 287 154 330C170 359 199 400 243 400C277 400 304 383 326 354C333 345 343 343 354 348C378 360 387 382 387 400Z" id="g50-100"></path></g></svg>.</span></div>

Shock and Vibration

fig15

Figure 15

Figure 15: A Comparative Study on Acoustic Optimization and Analysis of CLD/Plate in a Cavity Using ESO and GA 