Research Article
Vibration-Based Damage Identification and Condition Monitoring of Metro Trains: Warsaw Metro Case Study
Table 7
Average values of WODL for different time of day after wheels renovation, train number 18.
| Number | Date | Number of drives | Average WODL | Morning | Rush hour | Evening |
| 5 | 2004-02-11 | 19 | 0.65 | 0.57 | 0.68 | 6 | 2004-02-12 | 18 | 0.70 | 0.64 | 0.64 | 7 | 2004-02-13 | 11 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.64 | 8 | 2004-02-15 | 18 | 0.73 | 0.68 | 0.74 | 9 | 2004-02-16 | 18 | 0.81 | 0.65 | 0.77 | 10 | 2004-02-17 | 18 | 0.75 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 11 | 2004-02-18 | 18 | 0.77 | 0.85 | 0.76 | 12 | 2004-02-19 | 18 | 0.81 | 0.89 | 0.81 | 13 | 2004-02-20 | 13 | 0.78 | 0.81 | 0.79 | 14 | 2004-02-24 | 15 | 0.78 | 0.78 | 0.58 | 15 | 2004-02-26 | 18 | 0.78 | 0.86 | 0.78 | 16 | 2004-01-27 | 8 | 0.73 | 0.89 | 0.78 |
| Average value | 0.75 | 0.76 | 0.73 | Standard deviation | 0.0479 | 0.1074 | 0.0729 | Maximum value | 0.81 | 0.89 | 0.81 | Minimum value | 0.65 | 0.67 | 0.58 |
|
|