Research Article  Open Access
Wiesław Grzesikiewicz, Artur Zbiciak, "Mathematical Formulation of SoftContact Problems for Various Rheological Models of Damper", Shock and Vibration, vol. 2018, Article ID 8675016, 9 pages, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/8675016
Mathematical Formulation of SoftContact Problems for Various Rheological Models of Damper
Abstract
The paper deals with analysis of selected softcontact problems in discrete mechanical systems. Elasticdissipative rheological schemes representing dampers as well as the notion of unilateral constraints were used in order to model interaction between colliding bodies. The mathematical descriptions of softcontact problems involving variational inequalities are presented. The main finding of the paper is a method of description of softcontact phenomenon between rigid object and deformable rheological structure by the system of explicit nonlinear differentialalgebraic equations easy for numerical implementation. The results of simulations, that is, time histories of displacements and contact forces as well as hysteretic loops, are presented.
1. Introduction
Impact is a shortlived phenomenon of energy exchange between colliding bodies. The velocities of colliding bodies change rapidly and the reactions are impulsive in nature which means that the interactions are shortlived and reach large values. Classical theory of impact mechanics applied for rigid bodies assumes that the collision phenomenon results with discontinuous change of velocities and the reaction are modeled as impulses. However, such idealization may not be valid in many mechanical problems especially when we need to evaluate a history of reactions within a short time of collision.
In the model of impact of two elastic spheres presented by Panovko and Stronge [1, 2] the local deformability of these spheres is assumed with use of nonlinear spring possessing the following property , where denotes a parameter depending on the spheres’ radii and material. The Hertz model of impact can be used for modelling of elastic collisions.
The analysis of impact and contact problems in discrete mechanical systems has received a great deal of attention in the literature [3–5]. The mathematical description of such problems involves the notion of nonsmooth mechanics and needs a special numerical treatment [6–8].
In this paper we will apply rheological schemes representing deformable dampers and unilateral constraints for modeling of interaction between colliding bodies. The phenomenon of contact between rigid objects and deformable rheological structures is sometimes called “soft contact” [9]. The models we analyze in this paper allow evaluation of reactions during the time of collision.
The softcontact models analyzed in our paper involve two cases of interaction between rigid bodies. The first case concerns the impact of two rigid bodies through a deformable builtin damper. In order to simplify mathematical description we assumed that one of these bodies possesses an infinite mass. The second case of interaction applying softcontact models describes a rigid body interaction with discrete modelling of compliance for the contact region. In such models the compliance of the contact region is modelled with use of rheological schemes (see [2]).
We will analyze both linear viscoelastic schemes and nonlinear elastoplastic and viscoelastoplastic models of dampers. Using unilateral constraints one can model contact interactions between bodies. The mathematical descriptions of softcontact problems will be presented. The notion of variational inequalities will be used in order to describe unilateral constraints and frictional properties of rheological models of dampers.
The main finding of the paper is a method we propose allowing description of the softcontact problems with use of nonlinear explicit differentialalgebraic equations. Numerical solution of such equations can be obtained using classical algorithms. We will show the results of numerical simulations in order to demonstrate the validity of the proposed formulation.
2. SoftContact Problem Formulation with Use of Viscoelastic Rheological Scheme
Let us consider the description of the softcontact phenomenon in the system visualized in Figure 1. This system is composed of a rigid body (material point) possessing a mass and of a massless linear viscoelastic rheological model of damper having stiffness parameters and and viscosity . The unilateral constraints are visualized in Figure 1 by two horizontal bold lines representing massless bumpers. We also assume the gravity load acting where denotes gravity constant.
The coordinates , , and shown in Figure 1 determine the displacement of the body and deformation of the rheological structure. denotes the force of mutual interaction between the body and the structure. The configuration shown in Figure 1 represents such a time instant when and and . In case of this configuration both bumpers are in contact but the springs’ and dashpot’s forces as well as the reaction are equal to zero.
The description of the softcontact problem for the analyzed system may be obtained by formulation of the equation of the body’s motion and evolution of the structure’s deformation.
The equations describing the softcontact problem are as follows: where (1a) describes the motion of the material point while (1b) and (1c) represent the evolution of the structure’s deformation. The system of equations (1d) defines the relationships between a coordinate and the reaction . It should be emphasized that despite the linearity of viscoelastic scheme to be analyzed, the system of equations (1) is nonlinear because of the form of constraints defined in (1d) involving variational inequality.
We will prove that (1d) can be visualized via a mapping shown in Figure 2(a). Let us divide the set into two subsets . If , then the inequality is satisfied only for . If , the inequality transforms to the following form being satisfied for . The result of the proof is shown in Figure 2(a).
(a)
(b)
Our objective is to transform (1a), (1b), (1c), and (1d) to the system of explicit nonlinear differentialalgebraic equations. The expected system of equations should have the following form:where (2a) and (2b) can be easily obtained using (1a) and (1c), respectively.
The fundamental problem is to find the functions and describing time histories of displacement and reaction , respectively. Let us note that (1b) can be rewritten in the following equivalent form:
Equation (3) is a linear relation between and . Thus, using (3) and the mapping shown in Figure 2(a) leads to the solution as follows:
Graphical solution leading to (4b) is visualized in Figure 2(b) where the dashed lines represent two possible locations of the function expressed by (3) for and .
3. ElasticViscoplastic Rheological Scheme
This section is devoted to analysis of a softcontact problem with use of elasticviscoplastic rheological scheme shown in Figure 3. The scheme in Figure 3 was obtained using Figure 1 and replacing the spring by the slider modelling dryfriction or plasticity phenomena [10]. We assume that the slider force is denoted by while the limit force is .
The equations defining the softcontact problem have the following form:
The relationships expressed via (5e) describe constitutive characteristics of the slider. A graphical visualization of (5e) is shown in Figure 4 [8, 11].
In order to prove the equivalence of (5d) and the mapping in Figure 4 let us divide the set into three subsets .
If or then the inequality is satisfied only if . If then the inequality is satisfied for . Finally, if then the inequality is satisfied for .
We will demonstrate that the system of equations (5a), (5b), (5c), (5d), and (5e) can be replaced by the following differentialalgebraic equations:
Let us note that the functions and were formulated in previous section (see (4a) and (4b)). Our objective in this section is to find the mappings and describing time history of velocity and friction force , respectively. Substituting (5b) into (5c) gives
Using Figure 4 the lefthand side of (7) can be visualized in a graph as it was shown in Figure 5. The multivalued function shown in Figure 5 is a constitutive relationship of the system of two elements joined in parallel, the slider and the dashpot (see Figure 3).
The unknown functions and can be determined using (7) and the graph shown in Figure 5. The results are as follows:
4. Elastoplastic Rheological Scheme
Let us analyze nonlinear elastoplastic rheological scheme shown in Figure 4. The model contains two elastic elements (springs and ) and one friction element (slider). We will demonstrate that the solution of this softcontact problem is more complicated that it was in case of the systems analyzed in previous sections.
The system of equations describing the problem is similar to (5a), (5b), (5c), (5d), and (5e). The only difference is that we should replace (5c) by the following relation:
Moreover, we will formulate a differentialalgebraic system of equations similar to (6a), (6b), (6c), (6d), and (6e). The fundamental issue is to find the values of mappings describing time history of velocity and friction force .
Let us note that using (9) and the graph shown in Figure 4 representing constitutive relations of frictional element (slider), it is possible to evaluate and if . The solution is as follows:
It should be emphasized that evaluation of and if is complicated and needs a special treatment. First of all one should establish additional relationships constituting socalled differential successions of relationships described in (5d) and (5e). The notion of differential successions was used by authors in various mechanical problems [12–14]. Using differential successions we will define additional relations being satisfied by the time derivatives of variables in (5d) and (5e).
We will try to establish relationships between the rates and based on (5d) and the graph shown in Figure 2. We will formulate such relations in case of three subsets being defined below:
Let us note that subsets and correspond to horizontal and vertical branches of the graph in Figure 2. The subset corresponds to the origin of the graph in Figure 2.
It is easy to note that at points , the value is constant; thus . On the other hand at the same points , the value of can be arbitrary which gives . A similar analysis leads to the conclusion that if then and . At points there exist two options. If does not vary in time then and . The second case we should consider concerns a situation when does not vary over time then and .
Summarizing the above analysis leads to the following relationships:
The relationships described in (12) constitute time differential successions of the relations in (5d). The graphs of (12) are shown in Figure 7.
A similar analysis can be used in order to determine relationships between variables and based on (5e) and the graph shown in Figure 4. We assume the following decomposition of (5e) into five subsets:
If then the value of does not change in time but the velocity of the slider force is arbitrary; thus . If then one should consider two cases and or and . If then and . Similarly, we can define the relationships in case of subsets and .
Summarizing all cases gives the following formula:
Let us move back to the problem of evaluation of and if . We will begin with the case which is equivalent to the condition . We will use the relationships given in (12) along with the following equation resulting from (9):Additionally, let us note that using (13b) gives for (subsets and ). Moreover, for subsets and the differential successions expressed in (14) can be visualized in one graph shown in Figure 8.
If (see (11b)) then using (12) gives . Applying (15) along with the graph shown in Figure 8 gives .
If (see (11b)) then using (12) gives . Applying (5b) leads to the following equation:Substituting (16) into (15) gives the following relationship:Using (17) and the graph shown in Figure 8 leads to the solutionIt can be proved that the solution expressed via (18) is valid also if .
Using a similar procedure it is possible to evaluate if which is equivalent to the condition .
Finally, the total set of differentialalgebraic equations defining the problem of a material point impacting on elastoplastic rheological structure is as follows:where functions and are given in (4a) and (4b), respectively, while functions and have the following definitions:
5. Numerical Simulations
Computer simulations were carried out for the systems analysed in previous sections. The parameters of these systems are presented in Table 1 (compare Figures 1, 3, and 6). We assume that a material point of mass falling freely in the earth’s gravitational field impacts a rheological structure. The initial position of the material point equals m while its initial velocity is m/sec. The solutions of nonlinear differential equations defining the softcontact problems were obtained applying the classical 4thorder fixedtime step RungeKutta algorithm.

Let us begin with the results obtained in case of viscoelastic system shown in Figure 1. Time history graphs of displacements , , and are presented in Figure 9, while Figure 10 visualizes the reaction. These figures represent the solutions of (2a), (2b), (2c), and (2d) with initial conditions , , and . Let us note that for time sections [0, 0.4 sec] and [1.4 sec, 2.4 sec] the reaction equals zero, and , which means that the bumpers are not in contact. In other time instants, the reaction is bigger than zero, and . Thus, the bumpers are in contact.
We can also note analyzing Figures 9 and 10 that the variables , , , and tend to the following values:
Graphs shown in Figure 11 represent the solutions (hysteretic loops) on planes and . Analysing both loops one can see limit points = (981 N, 0.75 m) and = (981 N, 0.5 m).
(a)
(b)
In case of elasticviscoplastic model shown in Figure 3 the solutions of (6a), (6b), (6c), (6d), and (6e) are presented in Figures 12, 13, and 14. Let us note that for sec the variable does not change over time but the structure vibrates. During these vibrations there are short time instants when (see Figure 13). During such time instants the bumpers are not in contact.
(a)
(b)
The first time period of loading for sec is represented in hysteretic loops shown in Figure 14 by a thin line. The thick line in Figure 14 represents the second period of vibrations for sec.
The solutions of (19a), (19b), (19c), (19d), and (19e) describing elastoplastic system shown in Figure 6 are presented in Figure 15 (displacements), Figure 16 (reaction), and Figure 17 (hysteretic loops). Let us note that previously analyzed graphs shown in Figure 12 are similar to that of Figure 15. After a short transient time period, the coordinate is constant while and change over time. For such time periods when (see Figure 15) and (see Figure 16) the bumpers are not in contact.
(a)
(b)
Analyzing hysteretic loops shown in Figure 17 leads to the conclusion that the process of energy dissipation is formed in the first period of impact when changes over time. This time period is represented in Figure 17 by broken line OABCD. The next period of vibrations when the structure deforms elastically is represented by section DE in Figure 17.
Numerical examples analyzed in this section illustrate the solutions of the softcontact problems defined via differentialalgebraic equations derived in Sections 2, 3, and 4. Based on these equations it is possible to carry out an optimization procedure in order to find an optimal set of parameters for rheological structures modelling energy dissipators.
6. Final Remarks
Discrete rheological schemes analyzed in this paper are used to model energyabsorbing devices in machinery, vehicles, and buildings. The scheme visualized in Figure 6 was considered in [12] as a model of rail bumper while a viscoplastic scheme, similar to that shown in Figure 3, was analyzed in [15] as a model of magnetorheological fluid damper for seismic retrofit of buildings. Finding the response of rheological models exhibiting elasticity, viscosity, and plasticity phenomena against impact loading seems to be very important in order to investigate dissipative capabilities of these systems.
The fundamental characteristics of each damper model are its hysteretic loop (see Figures 11(a), 14(a), and 17(a)). For example the hysteretic loop visualized in Figure 11(a) is typical for viscoelastic rheological models. The loops shown in Figures 14(a) and 17(a) relate to rheological schemes modeling permanent deformations. Such phenomena are observed in elasticfriction dampers. On the other hand, rheological schemes with permanent deformations can be also used for the modelling of the contact region compliance between elastoplastic deformable bodies.
Thanks to the method proposed in this paper the three analyzed softcontact problems were formulated with use of nonlinear explicit differentialalgebraic equations. As it was demonstrated numerical solution of such equations can be obtained using classical RungeKutta algorithm. Thus, there was no need to use more advanced solvers. Moreover, we did not apply any regularization procedure as it is sometimes suggested in the literature where multivalued mappings describing friction and plasticity phenomena (see Figure 4) are arbitrarily replaced by regular functions (see [16] and cited literature).
In case of viscoelastic and elasticviscoplastic systems analyzed in Sections 2 and 3, respectively, explicit forms of equations defining the problems were obtained directly. In case of elastoplastic system presented in Section 4 explicit form of equations was obtained after formulation of additional relationships being satisfied by the time derivatives of variables defining the problem.
The rheological schemes analyzed in this paper were composed of finite number of elastic, viscous, and plastic elements. Because of strongly nonlinear nature of the analyzed problems, the method proposed herein cannot be simply generalized to any number of elements. Each scheme should be treated individually as it was shown analyzing three separate softcontact problems in this paper.
It is worth mentioning that the method presented in this paper can also be applied in case of softcontact viscoelastic problems described by fractional derivatives (see [17]).
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
References
 Y. G. Panovko, Introduction to the Theory of Mechanical Impact, Nauka, Moscow, Russia, 1977 (Russian).
 W. J. Stronge, Impact Mechanics, Cambridge University Press, 2000.
 A. C. FischerCripps, Introduction to Contact Mechanics, Springer, 2nd edition, 2007.
 G. Gilardi and I. Sharf, “Literature survey of contact dynamics modelling,” Mechanism and Machine Theory, vol. 37, no. 10, pp. 1213–1239, 2002. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar  MathSciNet
 D. E. Stewart, “Rigidbody dynamics with friction and impact,” SIAM Review, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 3–39, 2000. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar  MathSciNet
 V. Acary and B. Brogliato, Numerical Methods for Nonsmooth Dynamical Systems, Springer, 2008.
 B. Brogliato, Nonsmooth Mechanics: Models, Dynamics and Control, Springer, 1996.
 P. D. Panagiotopoulos, Inequality Problems in Mechanics and Applications: Convex and Nonconvex Energy Functions, Birkhäuser, Basel, Switzerland, 1985.
 R. Featherstone, Rigid Body Dynamics Algorithms, Springer, 2008.
 N. Ottosen and M. Ristinmaa, The Mechanics of Constitutive Modeling, Elsevier, 2005.
 R. Temam, Mathematical Problems in Plasticity, Bordas, Paris, France, 1985.
 W. Grzesikiewicz, “Dynamics of mechanical systems with constraints,” Transactions of Warsaw University of Technology, Mechanics, vol. 117, 1990 (Polish). View at: Google Scholar
 W. Grzesikiewicz, A. Wakulicz, and A. Zbiciak, “Mathematical modelling of rateindependent pseudoelastic SMA material,” International Journal of NonLinear Mechanics, vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 870–876, 2011. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 A. Zbiciak, “Dynamic analysis of pseudoelastic SMA beam,” International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 56–64, 2010. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 W. Grzesikiewicz and A. Zbiciak, “Application of rheological fluid dampers for vibration control of buildings,” Logistyka, vol. 6, pp. 1065–1072, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
 W. Grzesikiewicz, A. Wakulicz, and A. Zbiciak, “Constraints as models of bodies possessing nonsmooth constitutive characteristics,” in Monographs of Technical University of Lodz, Mathematical Methods in Continuum Mechanics, pp. 3–17, Technical University of Lodz, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
 A. Zbiciak and Z. Kozyra, “Dynamic analysis of a softcontact problem using viscoelastic and fractionalelastic rheological models,” Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 286–291, 2015. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
Copyright
Copyright © 2018 Wiesław Grzesikiewicz and Artur Zbiciak. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.