Research Article  Open Access
Vanliem Nguyen, Jianrun Zhang, Xiuzhi Yang, "LowFrequency Performance Analysis of SemiActive Cab’s Hydraulic Mounts of an OffRoad Vibratory Roller", Shock and Vibration, vol. 2019, Article ID 8725382, 15 pages, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/8725382
LowFrequency Performance Analysis of SemiActive Cab’s Hydraulic Mounts of an OffRoad Vibratory Roller
Abstract
To improve the ride comfort of the offroad vibratory roller, the cab’s hydraulic mounts were analyzed to prevent vibration sources transmitting to the cab. However, the cab’s lowfrequency shaking in the vertical direction and the direction of forward motion is still great. This study proposes an optimal fuzzyPID control method for semiactive cab’s hydraulic mounts based on an offroad vehicle roller dynamic model to analyze the lowfrequency performance of semiactive cab’s hydraulic mounts under the different operating conditions. In order to evaluate the ride comfort of the offroad vibratory roller with semiactive cab’s hydraulic mounts, the power spectral density (PSD) and the weighted root mean square (RMS) of acceleration responses of the vertical driver’s seat, cab’s pitch, and roll vibrations in the lowfrequency range are chosen as objective functions. Contrastive analysis of lowfrequency vibration characteristics of the offroad vibratory roller with passive cab’s hydraulic mounts, semiactive cab’s hydraulic mounts without optimization, and semiactive cab’s hydraulic mounts with optimization is, respectively, carried out. The research results show that the semiactive cab’s hydraulic mounts with optimization have an obvious effect on mitigating the cab shaking and improving the ride comfort in comparison with passive cab’s hydraulic mounts and semiactive cab’s hydraulic mounts without optimization.
1. Introduction
The vibratory roller plays an important in the field of the construction project on roads, railways, airports, and so on. There is a combination of the static force of the vehicle self and the dynamic force of the vibratory drum yielded by an eccentric mass rotating around the drum axis to compact soil, asphalt, and other materials in its work process. Thus, the vehicle’s vibration dynamics were mainly generated by the wheelsdeformable terrain interaction in the condition of the vehicle traveling and the drum/tyreselastoplastic terrain interactions in the condition of the vehicle working [1–4]. The interaction model between the tyre and soft soil ground had been applied for researching the effect of soil deformation on offroad vehicle ride responses [5, 6]. The dynamic pressuresinkage relationship of a smooth rigid wheelterrain interaction model was also studied [7]. Besides, the effect of the random terrain surfaces on earthmoving machinery’s ride comfort had been researched via the wheelssoil contact model [6, 8]. All research results indicated that the vibration responses of interactive models were strongly affected by the offroad deformed terrains.
Consequently, the vibratory roller’s ride comfort was researched via the interaction model between wheels and offroad terrain. The influence of design parameters of passive cab’s rubber mounts (PRMs) on the ride dynamics of a soil compactor was studied via experiment and simulation [9], and the PRM’s parameters were then optimized to improve the ride comfort [10]. The research results showed that the vibration responses of the vertical driver’s seat and cab’s pitch were greatly affected under various operating conditions. Because the lowfrequency excitation arising from the wheelsterrain interaction is mostly transmitted to the cab and the driver’s seat through PRM and seat’s suspension, the vibration responses in the lowfrequency range of 0.5–10 Hz caused by terrain surface roughness can lead to the main risk factors which seriously affect the driver’s mental and physical health [11]. Therefore, the PRM is difficult to satisfy the driver’s ride comfort under the lowfrequency excitation region of offroad terrain.
The vibratory roller cab’s isolation system is one of the most important factors to improve the driver’s ride comfort. A 3D nonlinear dynamic model of an offroad vibratory roller equipped with three different cab’s isolation mounts including the PRM, the passive hydraulic mounts (PHMs), and the pneumatic mounts was studied via the simulation and experimental investigations to investigate the vehicle’s ride comfort in a lowfrequency region [1]. The results showed that the lowfrequency and highstiffness characteristics of the PHM have a good effect on isolating lowfrequency vibration transmitted and controlling the cab shaking of the vibratory roller. However, the vertical driver’s seat and cab’s pitch vibrations were still great under operating conditions according to ISO 26311:1997 [12]. Therefore, research and control of the semiactive cab’s hydraulic mounts (SHMs) of the vibratory roller to enhance the ride comfort is necessary.
Nowadays, the combined control methods, such as the neuralPID control, fuzzyPID control, and integrated fuzzywheelbase preview control [13–15], were strongly developed for controlling the magnetorheological fluid of the semiactive suspension systems [16–18]. In order to enhance the control performance, the optimal control methods, such as neurofuzzy control with the fuzzy rules optimized by the genetic algorithm [19], fuzzyPID control with the control rules optimized by cultural algorithm [20], and fuzzyskyhook control using the multiobjective microgenetic algorithm [21], were also successfully applied. The research results showed that the optimal control methods were better than without optimization. However, all the above research studies mainly investigate the performance of the control methods; thus, the quarter car models are mostly used for all research studies. In addition, the above combined control methods have not yet been considered and applied for the SHM of the vibratory roller. Therefore, researching an optimal control method for the SHM to enhance further the offroad vibratory roller’s ride comfort is necessary.
In this study, based on a threedimensional nonlinear dynamic model of the offroad vibratory roller equipped with PHM [1], an SHM using the magnetorheological fluid with adjustable damping is then developed. An optimal fuzzyPID control method in which the fuzzy control rules optimized by the genetic algorithm program is applied to optimize the control force of the SHM. The performance of SHM with optimization for the ride comfort and the health of the driver is then evaluated through the power spectral density (PSD) and weighted root mean square (RMS) acceleration responses of the vertical driver’s seat, cab’s pitch, and roll vibrations in both the frequency and time domains under actual operating conditions of the offroad vibratory roller.
The innovation in this paper is that an 11DOF vehicle dynamics model which can fully reflect the pitch and roll of the cab is concerned under the various operating conditions. A new optimal method of the fuzzy control rules based on the genetic algorithm, which is known as a multiobjective optimal algorithm with wide search range and short search time, is successfully developed and applied for the optimal fuzzyPID controller. The two evaluation methods including the evaluation method of the vibration effect to the driver’s ride comfort via the weighted RMS acceleration response in the time region and the evaluation method of the vibration effect to the health and safety of the driver via the PSD acceleration responses in the lowfrequency region are carried out. The vibration responses of the vibratory roller under lowfrequency excitation of the offroad terrain ground, especially the pitch and roll vibration response of the cab with PHM, SHM without optimization, and SHM with optimization are, respectively, simulated and analyzed. The results show that the lowfrequency and highstiffness characteristics of SHM with optimization have a good effect on isolating lowfrequency vibration transmitted and controlling the cab shaking of the vibratory roller.
2. Vibratory Roller Dynamic Models
2.1. Modeling of the OffRoad Vibratory Roller Dynamic
Based on a threedimensional nonlinear dynamic model of the offroad vibratory roller [1], as shown in Figure 1(a), the basic structure of the vibratory roller consists of the rigid drum/tires, the front/rear vehicle frame, the cab, and the seat. The cab is connected with the rear frame via the cab’s isolation mounts which contain PRM, PHM, or SHM, as shown in Figures 1(b)–1(d), respectively.
A threedimensional nonlinear dynamic model with elevenDOF of a single drum vibratory roller and the cab’s isolation mount models are built as in Figures 2(a) and 2(b).
(a)
(b)
In Figure 2(a), z_{s} represents the vertical motion at the driver’s seat. z_{c}, ϕ_{c}, and θ_{c} are the vertical, the pitch, and the roll motions at the cab, respectively, and those are described as z_{rf}, ϕ_{rf}, and θ_{rf} at the rear vehicle frame. The vertical and roll motions of the front frame and the drum are described as z_{ff}, θ_{ff} and z_{d}, θ_{d}. z_{sej} and z_{tj} are the vertical motion of the deformable terrain under the drum and the tyres. The mass of the driver, the cab, the front frame, the engine, the rear frame, and the roller drum is described as m_{s}, m_{c}, m_{ff}, m_{rf}, and m_{d}, respectively. F_{ci} is the vertical dynamic forces generated by the cab’s isolation mounts (i = 1– 4). q_{tj} and q_{dj} are the offroad terrain roughness surface at tyres and drum contacts.
Based on the dynamic model of the vibratory roller and offroad terrains interaction, as shown in Figure 2(a), and the motion equations of the driver’s seat, cab, front/rear vehicle frame, and wheelsdeformable terrains interaction [1], the motion equations of the offroad vibratory roller can be represented in the matrix form as follows:where [M], [C], and [K] are (m × m) mass, damping, and stiffness matrices, respectively, {Z} is the (m × 1) displacement vector, {F(t)} is the (m × 1) exciting force vector, and m is the number of DOF (m = 11).
2.2. Mathematical Model for the Cab’s Isolation Mounts
Both the PRM and the PHM, as plotted in Figures 1(b) and 1(c), and their lumped parameter models described as in Figure 2(b) were studied via the simulation and experiment [1]. Herein, k_{r} and c_{r} are linear stiffness and damping coefficient of the main rubber mount, and a liquid damping force is expressed as the damping characteristic of a quadratic nonlinearity, in which c_{h} is the damping constant of the hydraulic mount.
In addition, a new model of SHM for the vibratory roller based on the PHM is proposed in this study. The basic structure of an SHM includes a main rubber, a damping plate driven by the bolt, and a closed chamber filled with the fluid. However, the fluid used in the closed chamber is a magnetorheological (MR) fluid with adjustable damping [16–18]. The damping plate of the SHM is equipped with an electromagnet coil and a flux guide. When the coil current is changing, a magnetic field in the flux guide is also being transformed; thus, the viscosity of MR fluid in the annular orifice is simultaneously changing. The result is that the vibration damping can be adjusted according to the different road surfaces. MR fluid flows in the upperlower chamber are also derived by the transfer of damping plate through the annular orifice and the orifices, as seen in Figure 1(d). The lumped parameter model of SHM is also represented by a linear stiffness k_{r} and damping c_{r} coefficients of the main rubber and a semiactive damping force of hydraulic mount, . Herein, u is an active damping force of MR fluid which is controlled by an optimal fuzzyPID controller, as shown in Figure 2(b).
The corresponding dynamic force at mount i of the cab’s isolation mounts in the vertical direction is given bywhere z_{ci}, z_{rfi} and are the displacements and the velocities of the cab frame and the rear frame at mount i of the isolation mounts. When i = 12 then α = 1, υ = 5, and δ = i + 1; when i = 34 then α = 2, υ = 4, and .
2.3. Random Excitation of the OffRoad Terrain Surface
In actual operating conditions, the excitation forces of the vibratory roller are strongly affected by the rough terrain surfaces apart from wheelsdeformable terrain interactions. The terrain behaviour under wheelsoil contact is nonlinear. Thus, the offroad vibratory rollers must be studied in the frequency domain apart from the traditional time domain to analyze the influence of excitation on the ride response. Offroad terrain surface in the frequency domain is calculated via the PSD value [6]. The spatial PSD of the road surface profile, S(Ω), is described as a function of the spatial frequency Ω (cycle·m^{−1}). The spectral density of offroad terrain is thus written in accordance with ISO proposal [22] over the different spatial frequency ranges bywhere for Ω ≤ Ω_{0} and for Ω > Ω_{0}; the value S(Ω_{0}) provides a measure for the random terrain with the reference spatial frequency Ω_{0} = 1/2π cycle·m^{−1}.
More specifically, assuming the vehicle moves with a constant speed , the offroad terrain irregularities in the time domain can then be simulated by the serieswhere N is the number of intervals and is the amplitude of each the excitation harmonic in which S is the target spectral density. Δn = 2π/L, and L is the length of the road segment. φ_{i} is a random phase uniformly distributed between 0 and 2π, and Δω = Δnv_{0} is the fundamental temporal frequency. Mitschke [23] extended the spectral density ranges for the unpaved offroad classifications apart from the traditional asphalt road classifications, including the classification ranges from good to very poor, and the desired terrain roughness can be yielded by choosing a value in the spectral density ranges.
In order to develop an offroad terrain roughness input closing to the actual terrain condition, the simulation parameters used for generating the time domain of a rough terrain surface, as shown in Figure 3(a), are a type of poor offroad classification with = 1.67 m·s^{−1}, L = 84 m, Δt = 0.005 s, = 2.14, and S(Ω_{0}) = 3782.5 × 10^{−6} m^{3}·cycle^{−1}. Its spectral density obtained from the time domain is also depicted in Figure 3(b). The frequency region of the input signal is mainly below 10 Hz.
(a)
(b)
2.4. Experimental Model Results
In order to validate the accuracy of the mathematical model of the offroad vibratory roller, experiments and simulations were carried out with cab’s isolation systems when the vehicle moved and compacted at a speed = 0.83 m·s^{−1} on a poor elastoplastic terrain surface at the excitation frequency, 28 Hz, of the drum [1]. The comparison results are shown in Figure 4. With PRM, as plotted in Figures 4(a)–4(c), comparisons of simulation and experimental results of the PSD acceleration responses are show that the simulation results almost agree with the tests as to the frequency of the various peaks in the responses and the trend. In addition, the weighted RMS values of the vertical driver’s seat, cab’s pitch, and roll vibrations of PRM, as shown in Figure 4(d), are deviated small by 10.20%, 11.21%, and 12.67% in comparison with the measured values. It implies that the mathematical model of the vibratory roller is the accurate and feasible model.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
In addition, simulation results with PHM showed that both PSD acceleration responses and the weighted RMS values of the vertical driver’s seat, cab’s pitch, and roll vibrations are greatly reduced, and the PHM has almost no effect on the resonance frequencies in comparison with PRM under the various operating conditions. Therefore, the model of the offroad vibratory roller using PHM not only enhances the vehicle’s ride comfort but also provides the accurate and feasible model for lowfrequency performance analysis of the semiactive cab’s hydraulic mounts (SHMs).
3. Design of the Optimal FuzzyPID Controller
3.1. Modeling of the Optimal FuzzyPID Control
The PID control is one of the controllers with not only a simple structure but also robust performance, and it is generally used in industrial process control. However, the performance of PID control depends on the appropriate selection of the PID’s parameters. The wellknown ZieglerNichols technique has been used to choose the PID’s parameters. However, it is only efficient when the system works at the designed operating condition. Contrariwise, the fuzzy logic control (FLC) does not depend on the designed operating condition; it only depends on the appropriate selection of the fuzzy inference system (FIS). However, the shortcomings of FLC are low precision and stability. In order to avoid shortcomings of both FLC and PID control, fuzzyPID control had been developed [18, 20, 24]. In this study, to enhance the control performance of fuzzyPID control (FPC), the control rules in FIS optimized via the genetic algorithm (GA) program are then developed and applied for the FPC’s optimization.
In the cab’s isolation mounts, there are four SHMs which should be separately controlled; thus, four optimal fuzzyPID controls should be designed. However, the design process of these controls is the same. Therefore, a specific of the optimal FPC is designed to control the active damping force of MR fluid. The model of the optimal FPC for SHM is depicted in Figure 5(a).
(a)
(b)
In Figure 5(a), fuzzyPID control includes two inputs and three outputs in which 2 inputs denoted by E and EC are the vertical displacement error (E) and the vertical velocity error (EC) of the cab frame, and 3 outputs denoted by are the proportionality factors, respectively. The proportional, integral, and derivative parameters in PID control are defined by K_{p}, K_{i}, and K_{d} which can be automatically tuned and depend on the parameters of the FLC, and the actual control force of MR fluid u(t) is decided by the PID control; the control force f_{d} of SHM is then used for subsystem of the vehicle. In order to enhance the further performance of the FPC, the GA program is used to optimize the control rules in FIS via the subsystem of the vehicle and the objective functions.
The force output of the PID control is given bywhere e(t) is the displacement error the cab frame.
The initial values of proportionality factors in equation (5) determined by the ZieglerNichols method via the subsystem model are K_{p}(0) = 1985, K_{i}(0) = 18, and K_{d}(0) = 1.2. In order to find the best values for K_{p}, K_{i}, and K_{d}, we assume their variable ranges as [K_{pmin}, K_{pmax}], [K_{imin}, K_{imax}], and [K_{dmin}, K_{dmax}], respectively. Thus, based on the initial values, the range of each parameter is chosen by K_{p} ∈ [100, 2500], K_{i} ∈ [1, 100], and K_{d} ∈ [0.1, 10].
The next is a design of the FLC. The basic fuzzy control consists of the following major parts: fuzzification interface, FIS, and defuzzification interface. First, the crisp values in fuzzification are transformed into linguistic variables, FIS is then used by control rules in accordance with inference rules, and finally, the linguistic variables are transformed back to crisp values through defuzzification for use by the physical plant [25]. Therefore, the FPC can be designed in three steps below:
(i)Choosing the fuzzy control inputoutput: two input variables E and EC belong to [−0.25, 0.25]. Besides, three output variables are calibrated over the interval [0, 1] as follows [24]:Hence, the input values in equation (5) are, respectively, . The linguistic variables of two inputs are defined by the positive big (PB), positive small (PS), zero (ZO), negative small (NS), and negative big (NB). Besides, the linguistic variables of three outputs are also defined as small (S), medium small (MS), medium (M), medium big (MB), and big (B), respectively.(ii)Membership function: the shape of membership functions of inputoutput variables is used by the triangular function, and its degree of membership is between 0 and 1, as shown in Figure 5(b).(iii)The FIS’s rules: the initial control rules are given by the designer’s knowledge and experience as follows:(1)If E is NB and EC is NB, then is MS, is S, and is S(2)If E is NB and EC is NS, then is M, is MS, and is S (25)If E is PB and EC is PB, then is B, is MB, and is MB where FIS is selected by the minimum function and the centroid method of Mamdani and Assilian [25], and the above control rules are then optimized by GA program through the subsystem model.
3.2. Optimization of the Control Rules Based on the GA Program
3.2.1. GA Program
GA is an optimization method based on principles of natural selection. It seeks the maximum or the minimum values of one or more objective functions using computational techniques motivated by biological reproduction. Therefore, GA is defined as finding a vector of decisive variables that satisfies constraints to give acceptable values to all objective functions [26, 27], and it can be written as follows:
Find the vector x = [x_{1}, x_{2},…, x_{n}]^{T} to optimizewhere F(x) is the vector of objective functions, which must be either maximized or minimized, and p and q are numbers of inequality constraints and equality constraints.
GA is structured into the following steps: encoding, population initialization, fitness evaluation, parent selection, genetic operations (crossover and mutate), and termination criterion. The flow chart of the GA program for SHM is built in Figure 6.
3.2.2. Application of GA Program to Optimize the Control Rules
The goal main of GA is to seek the optimal control rules in FIS to get the minimum values of the weighted RMS acceleration responses of the vertical driver’s seat, cab’s pitch, and roll vibrations via the subsystem model in Figure 5(a). Therefore, GA’s structure is built as follows:(i)Encoding mechanism and initial population: in “(iii) The FIS’s rules,” there are 25 control rules that contain a total of 75 elements. The 75 elements are then connected into a string of numbers as a chromosome which is regarded as a vector. Encoding mechanism can shorten the chromosome length of the individuals in population space to enhance the running speed and to reduce the searching space of the algorithm program. Thus, the linguistic variables of two inputs (E and EC) are encoded by the numbers as [NB, NS, ZO, PS, PB] = [0, 1, 2, 3, 4] = [a_{j}]_{1×5}, and the linguistic variables of three outputs () are encoded by the numbers as [S, MS, M, MB, B] = [5, 6, 7, 8, 9] = [b_{j}]_{1×5}. Besides, the individuals in the initial population are randomly generated. For each gene, the value of that gene is also selected as a random positive integer in the range of 0 ≤ a_{j} ≤ 4 and 5 ≤ b_{j} ≤ 9, and the size of the initial population is 100.(ii)Objective function and fitness value: the minimum values of the weighted RMS acceleration responses (a_{wl}) of the vertical driver’s seat, cab’s pitch, and roll vibrations are selected as objective functions in this study. The expression of objective functions is written in equation (9). In order to find the minimum values of the weighted RMS acceleration responses, the fitness value J is greatly simplified to calculate objective functions as follows [20, 27]: where subscript l refers to the vertical driver’s seat (z_{s}), cab’s pitch (ϕ_{c}), or cab’s roll (θ_{c}) vibrations and α_{l} is the scalar that weighted or percent of the weighted RMS values in l. The individuals with the higher fitness value J which is obtained via the subsystem model show that the obtained control rules in “(iii) The FIS’s rules” are better. Therefore, the resultant individuals are updated before the evolution process ends, and the optimal individuals can be obtained.(iii)Genetic operations: after establishing the initial population and selecting the parents. Genetic operations (including crossover and mutation) are then performed. Herein, crossover probability of 0.95 and mutation probability of 0.05 have been used in 200 generations. Therefore, the arithmetic crossover is performed on 95% of the selected parents, whereby two children are created from the weighted sum of two parents, and children of the remaining 5% of selected parents are exact copies of the parents. Crossover operation is performed until the population number is doubled. Then, each individual undergoes the mutation operation which is the process of randomly changing the values of genes in a chromosome with a probability of 0.05. The mutation can create new genetic material into an existing individual and add diversity to the genetic characteristics of the population. Finally, through the fitness value J, only the optimal individuals are selected at the end of each generation to exist as the population of the next generation. For the termination criterion, the limitary generation is used; then, the resultant population is evaluated to determine convergence.
3.2.3. Optimal Result of the Control Rules
In order to seek the optimal control rules for the FPC, we assume that the vibratory roller travels on the deformable terrain at a constant speed = 1.67 m·s^{−1}, and offroad terrain excitation input q(t) of the subsystem model is chosen as in Figure 3(a) with the simulation time of 10 s. The scalar that weighted RMS values of the vertical driver’s seat, cab’s pitch, and roll vibrations are α_{z} = 0.486, α_{ϕ} = 0.449, and α_{θ} = 0.065, respectively, which are decided based on the percent of the weighted RMS value of the vertical driver’s seat (48.6%), cab’s pitch (44.9%), and cab’s roll vibrations (6.5%) with the weighted RMS values of the PHM in Table 1. The maximum generation is 200.

The result in Figure 7 shows that the maximum fitness value J is obtained from the evolutionary generation of 133 to the end. Therefore, the optimal individuals can be obtained at the generation of 133. By recording, the optimal control rules in FIS are listed in Table 2. The optimal control rules are then used for the optimal FPC to simulate and analyze the lowfrequency performance of semiactive cab’s hydraulic mounts.

4. Results and Discussion
4.1. Evaluation Criteria
The performance of the vehicle suspension system is evaluated by three main indices in the time domain, including the ride comfort, working space, and road holding characteristics.
Among these three indices, the ride comfort performance evaluated via the weighted RMS acceleration response is considered to be the most important index [1]. In addition, in the international standard ISO 26311 [12], the PSD acceleration response is also applied to estimate the effect of vibration on the endurance limit of the human body in the frequency domain. It was suggested that a lowfrequency range of 4–10 Hz for the vertical and of 0.5–2 Hz for the rotational vibrations seriously affected the driver’s health and safety. In this study, the performance of SHM also is evaluated through both the PSD and the weighted RMS acceleration responses of the vertical driver’s seat, cab’s pitch, and roll vibrations in the frequency and time domains. Thus, the smaller PSD and weighted RMS values mean to be the better ability of the corresponding isolation mounts. The expression of RMS was given bywhere is the acceleration response in the l as a function of time and T = 50 s is the time of simulation.
4.2. Control Performance When the Vehicle Travels on the Deformable Terrain
In this study, the vehicle is assumed to be traveling on a terrain type of Grenville loam given by Wong [28] at a constant speed = 1.67 m·s^{−1}. The Grenville loam’s parameters including n = 1.01, k_{c} = 0.06 × 10^{3} N·m^{−(n+1)}, k_{φ} = 5880 × 10^{3} N·m^{−(n+2)}, c = 3.1 × 10^{3} Pa, φ = 29.8°, and its offroad terrain irregularity as in Figures 3(a) are the random excitation inputs of the simulating model. Simulations are then carried out to analyze the lowfrequency performance of SHM based on the design parameters of a single drum vibratory roller [1].
A good cab’s isolation system should be able to minimize its deflection and acceleration to enhance the driver’s ride comfort. In addition, the driver’s mental and physical health is affected not only by the acceleration responses in the time region but also by the PSD acceleration responses in the lowfrequency region [11]. Therefore, the maximum PSD and the weighted RMS values of the vertical driver’s seat, cab pitch, and roll vibrations are, respectively, given to compare the lowfrequency performance of SHM.
The simulation results of the PSD acceleration responses of the vertical driver’s seat, cab’s pitch, and roll vibrations are plotted in Figures 8(a)–8(c), respectively. In Figure 8, the resonance frequencies of PSD acceleration responses of the vertical driver’s seat, cab’s pitch, and roll vibrations with SHM without optimization and with optimization have not been changed in comparison with PHM. This can be due to the fact that stiffness coefficients of the cab’s isolation system are unchanged and its damping control forces have almost no effect on the resonance frequencies. However, the maximum resonance peaks of the PSD acceleration responses are significantly transformed by the SHM.
(a)
(b)
(c)
The maximum resonance peaks of the PSD acceleration responses of the vertical driver’s seat, cab’s pitch, and roll vibrations of SHM without optimization are smaller than PHM. Meanwhile, the maximum resonance peaks of the PSD acceleration responses of SHM with optimization are the smallest. Especially in lowfrequency below 4 Hz, the maximum PSD values of the vertical driver’s seat, cab’s pitch, and roll vibrations of SHM with optimization are greatly reduced by 32.97%, 29.08%, and 64.40% in comparison with PHM, respectively. This is due to the main impact of the semiactive damping force of hydraulic mount . Therefore, the health of the driver can be clearly improved by SHM using the optimal fuzzyPID controller.
The simulation results of the acceleration responses are also shown in Figures 9(a)–9(c). In Figure 9, we can see that the acceleration responses of SHM with optimization are lower than both PHM and SHM without optimization. Besides, the weighted RMS acceleration responses in Table 1 also show that the weighted RMS values of the vertical driver’s seat, cab’s pitch, and roll vibrations of SHM with optimization are strongly reduced by 34.99%, 42.56%, and 41.72% in comparison with PHM, respectively. The above analysis results indicate that when the vehicle travels on the deformable terrain, the driver’s ride comfort can be clearly improved by SHM with optimization in both the time and the lowfrequency region. Therefore, the SHM with optimization could provide the best ride comfort performance for the offroad vibratory roller in the condition of the vehicle traveling.
(a)
(b)
(c)
4.3. Control Performance When the Vehicle Moves and Compacts on the Elastoplastic Soil Ground
In the working condition of the vibratory roller, the effect of the elastoplastic soil grounds on the performance of the compaction process was studied under the excitation frequencies of the drum in a range of 0.1–70 Hz [2–4, 9]; the research results showed that comprehensive drum/soil contact and loss of contact data had appeared over a range of 15–40 Hz [4], especially at the excitation frequencies of 28.5 Hz and 33 Hz of the drum which yielded the maximum compaction forces due to “doublejump” of the drum [2, 9]. Based on the design parameters of a single drum vibratory roller [1], the excitation frequency of the vibratory drum in the working condition was also given at 28 and 35 Hz; therefore, the excitation frequencies of the vibratory drum at 28 and 35 Hz with the parameters of the vehicle [1] are used for simulation. Besides, in compression process of the drum, the elastoplastic soil properties are changed during the interaction between the rigid drum and soil ground. The elastoplastic soil properties are represented via three different values of the plasticity parameter ε, including lowdensity soil ε = 0.34, mediumdensity soil ε = 0.72, and highdensity soil ε = 0.87 [9]. However, the elastoplastic property of lowdensity soil (ε = 0.34) is similar to the property of a soft soil deformation which is simulated in the condition of the vehicle traveling. Therefore, in order to evaluate the lowfrequency performance of SHM in the condition of the vehicle working, the vehicle is moved and compacted at very slow speed 0.83 m·s^{−1} under a low/high excitation frequency, 28/35 Hz, of the vibratory drum on a high elastoplastic soil ground. The parameters of the high elastoplastic soil ground includes ε = 0.87, k_{sp} = 283 × 10^{6} N·m^{−1}, k_{se} = 42.3 × 10^{6} N·m^{−1}, and c_{se} = 37.1 × 10^{3} Ns·m^{−1}.
The comparison results of the PSD acceleration responses of the vertical driver’s seat, cab’s pitch, and roll vibrations with the cab’s isolation systems at a low/high excitation frequency, 28/35 Hz, of the vibratory drum are seen in Figures 10 and 11. Similarly, in the condition of the vehicle traveling, the resonance frequencies of PSD acceleration responses of the vertical driver’s seat, cab’s pitch, and roll vibrations of SHM without optimization and SHM with optimization are also unchanged in comparison with PHM. The simulation results also show that the resonance frequencies of SHM without optimization and SHM with optimization also occur at 28.18/35.18 Hz comparable with PHM in all three directions. This can be due to the effect of the resonance at a low/high excitation frequency, 28/35 Hz, of the vibratory drum. In addition, the resonance frequency of the acceleration PSD responses of all cab’s isolation systems clearly appears at 5.69 Hz in both graphs of Figures 10 and 11, whereas this resonance frequency does not occur in the graph of Figure 8. This particularity may be due to the effect of the soil stiffness with the highdensity soil ground.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(a)
(b)
(c)
Besides, at a lowfrequency range below 4 Hz, the maximum resonance peaks of the PSD acceleration responses of the vertical driver’s seat, cab’s pitch, and roll vibrations of SHM with optimization are strongly reduced in comparison with PHM by 24.46%, 31.47%, and 59.37% at a low excitation frequency, 28 Hz, of the drum and by 17.76%, 33.52%, and 53.85% at a high excitation frequency, 35 Hz, of the drum, respectively. This is also due to the main impact of the semiactive damping force of hydraulic mount . Contrarily, at a frequency range upper 4 Hz, the PSD acceleration responses of the vertical driver’s seat, cab’s pitch, and roll vibrations of SHM without optimization and SHM with optimization are slightly increased in comparison with PHM, especially at the resonance frequency of 5.69 Hz. However, the PSD acceleration values are very small. Therefore, the driver’s health can be clearly improved by using SHM with optimization in the lowfrequency region when the vehicle moves and compacts on an elastoplastic soil ground.
The simulation results in Figures 12 and 13 also show that the acceleration responses of the vertical driver’s seat, cab’s pitch, and roll vibrations of SHM with optimization are lower than both PHM and SHM without optimization. Besides, the values of the weighted RMS acceleration responses are also listed in Tables 3 and 4. The weighted RMS values of the vertical driver’s seat, cab’s pitch, and roll vibrations of SHM with optimization are greatly reduced in comparison with SHM by 35.16%, 48.29%, and 37.65% under a low excitation frequency, 28 Hz, of the drum and by 24.80%, 43.15%, and 36.06% under a high excitation frequency, 35 Hz, of the drum, respectively. Consequently, the above analysis results also indicate that the driver’s ride comfort and health are strongly improved by SHM with optimization when the vehicle moves and compacts on the high elastoplastic soil ground under both the low/high excitation frequency, 28/35 Hz, of the vibratory drum.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(a)
(b)
(c)


5. Conclusions
Modeling and lowfrequency performance analysis of semiactive cab’s hydraulic mounts of the offroad vibratory roller are addressed in this work. The comparison between the simulation and test results of passive cab’s isolation mounts is also carried out. The lowfrequency performance of SHM using the optimal fuzzyPID controller is then evaluated through the PSD acceleration and weighted RMS values of the vertical driver’s seat, cab’s pitch, and roll vibrations in both the frequency and time domains. The results are summarized as follows:(1)In the condition of the vehicle traveling, the weighted RMS acceleration responses and the PSD acceleration responses of the vertical driver’s seat, cab’s pitch, and roll vibrations of SHM with optimization are lower than both PHM and SHM without optimization. Particularly, the weighted RMS values of SHM with optimization are strongly reduced in comparison with PHM by 34.99%, 42.56%, and 41.72%, respectively.(2)In condition of the vehicle working, both PSD acceleration responses and the weighted RMS values of the vertical driver’s seat, cab’s pitch, and roll vibrations of SHM using the optimal fuzzyPID controller are clearly smaller comparable with both PHM and SHM without optimization under both low/high excitation frequency, 28/35 Hz, of the drum on the high elastoplastic soil ground. Especially, the maximum PSD values of the vertical driver’s seat, cab’s pitch, and roll vibrations of SHM with optimization are strongly reduced by 24.46%, 31.47%, and 59.37% in comparison with PHM when the vehicle compacts at a low excitation frequency, 28 Hz, of the drum.(3)The above analysis results indicate that the lowfrequency and highstiffness characteristics of SHM using the optimal fuzzyPID controller have the best effect on isolating lowfrequency vibration transmitted and controlling the cab shaking under various operating conditions of the offroad vibratory roller.
Data Availability
The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.
References
 V. Liem, J. Zhang, V. Quynh, and R. Jiao, “Vibration analysis and modeling of an offroad vibratory roller equipped with three different cab’s isolation mounts,” Shock and Vibration, vol. 2018, Article ID 8527574, 17 pages, 2018. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 D. Adam and F. Kopf, “Theoretical analysis of dynamically loaded soils,” in Proceedings of the European Workshop Compaction of Soils and Granular Materials, pp. 207–217, Paris, France, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
 J. Li, Z. Zhang, H. Xu, and Z. Feng, “Dynamic characteristics of the vibratory roller testbed vibration isolation system: simulation and experiment,” Journal of Terramechanics, vol. 56, pp. 139–156, 2014. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. Paul and A. Michael, “Capturing nonlinear vibratory roller compactor behavior through lumped parameter modeling,” Journal of Engineering Mechanics, vol. 134, no. 8, pp. 684–693, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
 X. Zhang, “Modelling, simulation and optimization of ride comfort for off road articulated dump trucks,” Southeast University, Nanjing, China, 2010, Ph.D. thesis. View at: Google Scholar
 A. Pakowski and D. Cao, “Effect of soil deformability on offroad vehicle ride dynamics,” SAE International Journal of Commercial Vehicles, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 362–371, 2013. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 R. A. Irani, R. J. Bauer, and A. Warkentin, “Dynamic wheelsoil model for lightweight mobile robots with smooth wheels,” Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems, vol. 71, no. 2, pp. 179–193, 2013. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 S. Park, A. A. Popov, and D. J. Cole, “Influence of soil deformation on offroad heavy vehicle suspension vibration,” Journal of Terramechanics, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 41–68, 2004. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 A. Kordestani, S. Rakheja, P. Marcotte, A. Pazooki, and D. Juras, “Analysis of ride vibration environment of soil compactors,” SAE International Journal of Commercial Vehicles, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 259–272, 2010. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 V. Quynh, “Vibration study and control for cab of vibratory roller,” Southeast University, Nanjing, China, 2013, Ph.D. thesis. View at: Google Scholar
 M. Griffin, Handbook of Human Vibration, Academic Press, London, UK, 1990.
 International Organization for Standardization, “Mechanical vibration and shockevaluation of human exposure to whole body vibrationpart 2: general requirements,” ISO, Geneva, Switzerland, 1997, Tech. Rep. ISO 26311:1997. View at: Google Scholar
 Ş. Yildirim, “Vibration control of suspension systems using a proposed neural network,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, vol. 277, no. 45, pp. 1059–1069, 2004. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 N. Ebrahimi and A. Gharaveisi, “Optimal fuzzy supervisor controller for an active suspension system,” International Journal of Soft Computing & Engineering, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 36–39, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
 Z. Xie, P. Wong, J. Zhao, T. Xu, and I. Wong, “A noiseinsensitive semiactive air suspension for heavyduty vehicles with an integrated fuzzywheelbase preview control,” Mathematical Problem in Engineering, vol. 2013, Article ID 121953, 12 pages, 2013. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 B. Kasemi, A. G. A. Muthalif, M. M. Rashid, and S. Fathima, “FuzzyPID controller for semiactive vibration control using magnetorheological fluid damper,” Procedia Engineering, vol. 41, pp. 1221–1227, 2012. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 T. Nguyen, “A novel semiactive magnetorheological mount for vibration isolation,” The University of Toledo, Toledo, OH, USA, 2009, Ph.D. thesis. View at: Google Scholar
 A. Muthalif, B. Kasemi, D. Nordin, and M. Rashid, “Semiactive vibration control using experimental model of Magnetorheological damper with adaptive fuzzyPID controller,” Smart Structures and Systems, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 85–97, 2017. View at: Google Scholar
 S. D. Nguyen, Q. H. Nguyen, and S.B. Choi, “A hybrid clustering based fuzzy structure for vibration controlpart 2: an application to semiactive vehicle seatsuspension system,” Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, vol. 5657, pp. 288–301, 2015. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 W. Wang, Y. Song, Y. Xue, H. Jin, J. Hou, and M. Zhao, “An optimal vibration control strategy for a vehicle's active suspension based on improved cultural algorithm,” Applied Soft Computing, vol. 28, pp. 167–174, 2015. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Y. Chen, Z. Wang, J. Qiu, and Z. Huang, “Hybrid fuzzy skyhook surface control using multiobjective microgenetic algorithm for semiactive vehicle suspension system ride comfort stability analysis,” Journal of Dynamic Systems Measurement & Control, vol. 134, no. 4, pp. 1–14, 2012. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 International Organization for Standardization, “Reporting vehicle road surface irregularities,” Thieme Medical Publishers, Stuttgart, Germany, 1982, Tech. Rep. ISO/TC108/SC2/WG4 N57. View at: Google Scholar
 M. Mitschke, Dynamik der Kraftfahrzeuge, SpringerVerlag, Berlin, Germany, 1972.
 M. Rahmat, “Application of selftuning fuzzy PID controller on industrial hydraulic actuator using system identification approach,” International Journal on Smart Sensing & Intelligent Systems, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 246–261, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
 E. H. Mamdani and S. Assilian, “An experiment in linguistic synthesis with a fuzzy logic controller,” International Journal of ManMachine Studies, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 1975. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Z. Nariman, M. Salehpour, A. Jamali, and E. Hanghgoo, “Pareto optimization of a fivedegree of freedom vehicle vibration model using a MUGA,” Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 543–551, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
 H. John, G. Michael, and D. Gregory, “Multiobjective control optimization for semiactive vehicle suspensions,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, vol. 330, pp. 5502–5516, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
 J. Y. Wong, “Data processing methodology in the characterization of the mechanical properties of terrain,” Journal of Terramechanics, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 13–41, 1980. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
Copyright
Copyright © 2019 Vanliem Nguyen et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.